The man getting paid by @WHO leading the transmission reviews of CoVid, folks.
Tweeting out an article that argues that Kulldorff, Heneghan, and Jefferson are being censored because their views are not allowed to course freely on Twitter or Facebook.
Anyway, if they'll hire Alexander, I'm fairly confident they'll hand the keys to the kingdom to Heneghan.
Back to Heneghan, his gripe is that he feels put upon because Facebook labelled his article on the article on the Danish study on masks as false information.
Since he wants to bring it up? Pepperidge Farm is here to serve up a slice of humble pie.
Always a great study when tweeted out by Dr. Noakes - let's dive in.
✅2 cases of transmission from bus drivers to passengers up to more than 9 feet/ 3 meters.
✅Genomic confirmation
✅Airflow traced - please see Dr. Noakes original thread for commentary on the method used.
This. This is why I push ever harder on #CoVidIsAirborne, and against Conly and Heneghan.
If we let impossible standards to be ramrodded down our throat by a @WHO who has hired an antimasker to run an airborne transmission, then we are lost.
The logic that aerosols produced by a nebullizer aren't indicative of aerosol transmission was also used by Dr. Conly, the @WHO's lead on the transmission committee during the discussion of #CovidIsAirborne.
Dark purple outline - mention of 5 micron cut-off
Purple - airborne = particles that remain suspended in the air.
Light Green - "particles that can be inhaled"
Dark Green - "particles that are infectious".
A dotted line indicates the older source is cited in order to disagree.