If you think military personnel and law enforcement who express white supremacist sentiment shouldn’t be fired because “free speech” and “Muh First Amendment,” respectfully —
— shut the fuck up about Critical Race Theory for all eternity.
Let me explain something for the “Critical Race Theory is bad and should be banned because it talks about systemic racism and we’re postracial” [etc] crowd.
Have you ever heard of the Truth and Reconciliation commission?
Here’s something to consider:
Racism didn’t magically end after the Civil War. That’s why a thing called Reconstruction happened.
Racism didn’t magically end then. That’s why a thing called the Civil Rights Struggle happened.
Racism didn’t magically end then. That’s why a thing called BLM happened.
Passage of the Civil Rights Act (1964) and the Voting Rights Act (1965) didn’t end the racism entrenched in white-dominated power structures like, for example, southern policing.
Why?
Do you recall mass resignations of KKK cops? You think they woke up anti-racist overnight?
The United States never programmatically confronted the legacy of slavery and its aftermath - neither a retributive (postwar Germany’s Denazification) nor restorative model of justice (Truth & Reconciliation in South Africa).
… where exactly did all those Klan cops go?
Critical Race Theory is - bluntly - historical context.
That’s it.
If that upsets you, I assume it’s because you’re busy planning Denazification / Truth & Reconciliation style approaches that’d render CRT obsolete - since you clearly find the topic of racism so horrible.
When your doctor diagnoses you with a cancerous tumor, and it scares you so much you never call him back to schedule surgery — don’t be surprised and try to sue when it later metastasizes and kills you.
Finally - if you’re in the “I’m not responsible for slavery; that was 400 years ago and I refuse to feel guilty for something I didn’t do!” camp:
Explain to me again why Critical Race Theory bothers you.
Slowly.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Okay, kids - I need an entertainment break, so gather round for the latest installment of:
NEO-NAZI NONSENSE STORY TIME!
“Bitchy Old White Men Catfight Edition: Tom Mezger vs. David Duke, Part II”
Refresher:
Metzger and Duke were super tight back in the contemporary white supremacist movement’s Swastika Stone Age. Duke recruited Metzger for the KKK in 1975; Metzger ran Duke’s political campaign.
Quick mini-thread on something that’s been on my mind:
Answering the “Given the risks, why do you work on the white supremacist movement?” question that inevitably comes up in interviews and casual conversation.
Most of us who work on political violence routinely receive threats of all types, with a range of seriousness / credibility.
I’ve faced this from anti-Abortion extremists, white supremacists, ISIS, etc.
I’ve ONLY been asked “why do you work on it?” about white supremacists.
(This isn’t a call-out, btw - I get the question all the time.)
“Given the risks to you, why do you do this?”
I normally have the standard answers that don’t require thought, like most of us - it’s instantaneous.
But in a media interview a while back, this changed.
“If he walks, that’s it. It’s over. This is Rodney King times a million. It’s hard for me to believe Chauvin isn’t a ghost skin who murdered George Floyd to deliberately burn the country down.”
If you’re following #closingarguments in the Chauvin trial — I recommend listening to the reactions of a former Neo-Nazi who once worked with Metzger on strategies of infiltrating police.
So jury deliberations in the Derek Chauvin trial start April 19, do they?
... that’s quite the unfortunate date.
I’m going to just put in a small request for the federal government to hold off on all “Anglo-Saxon” KKKaucus announcements, statements on proposed gun control measures, appointments of Waco veterans to ATF, and so on and so forth until May.
[can’t blame a girl for asking.]
April 19-20 are dates of some relatively key significance on the calendar of white people violence.