THREAD: Belshazzar’s Riddle.

SUB-TITLE: When I consider the work of your hands...

#Babylon, #Numerology, #MedoPersia, #Stargazers: what’s not to like?

Later, a substack link. As a taster, however, let me (try to!) intrigue you with some data.
The text of Daniel 5 is patterned around a whole array of threefold groups and structures.

It consists of three paragraphs and thirty verses.
It contains three notable triplets, namely:

✅ Daniel’s trio of attributes (‘light, insight, and wisdom’),

✅ Daniel’s threefold ability (‘the ability to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems’), and
✅ Belshazzar’s threefold reward (‘to be clothed in purple, adorned with a gold chain, and made the third most powerful man in the kingdom’), which, of course, is mentioned three times.

And the chapter comes to its climax with a nine-fold condemnation of Belshazzar’s idolatry,
…at which point Daniel presents his solution to Belshazzar’s riddle,

which is similarly threefold in nature.

It’s predicated on a nine-syllable utterance (Meneh Meneh, Tekel, and Parsin),

which Daniel distils into a 3 x 3 matrix of characters,
…from which Daniel generates a second 3 x 3 matrix,

where he interprets each of the triliteral ‘roots’ of meneh, tekel, and peres in three different ways.

From the root M-N-H Daniel generates the words meneh, menah, and manniyah,
from T-K-L the words tekel, tekiltah, and kalletah,

and from P-R-S the words peres, perisat, and paras,

per the matrix below.
…which Daniel puts together and expands to yield his solution (and hence his message to Belshazzar), as shown below:
Not bad, eh?

Far more, however, can be said about the numerical properties of Daniel’s message.

Consider, for a start, its allusions to the number 91.

✅ Both the uppermost row (M-N-H) and the leftmost column (S-L-H) of Daniel’s 3 x 3 grid of consonants have a value of 91,
✅ Daniel’s statement and interpretation of Belshazzar’s riddle consists of exactly 91 letters (in the Aleppo Codex; the WLC has 92).
✅ And, finally, the weights mentioned by Daniel in his interpretation of Belshazzar’s riddle have a combined weight of 91 shekels,

since a shekel plus a peres (30 shekels) plus a mina (60 shekels) amounts to 91 shekels.
In fact, the three letters in the leftmost column of our grid (אלס) sum to 91 precisely because each of their values corresponds to one of Daniel’s weights:

alef (א) has a value of 1, lamed (ל) a value of 30, and samech (ס) a value of 60.
Note: These same letters spell out the verb סלא = ‘to be risen in the balances’, which has an obvious application to Belshazzar insofar as he’s been outweighed by ‘the mina of the land’ (Nebuchadnezzar) on the far side of the balances.
Daniel’s message to Belshazzar can thus be shown to contain multiple allusions to the number 91, which is significant.

Why? Because the number 91 hints at the identity of both the protagonist and the antagonist in Daniel 5’s events...
...insofar as it’s the gematrial value of both the Hebrew word ha-elohim (האלהים) = ‘God’ and the Aramaic word malkah (מלכא) = ‘the king’.

Encrypted within Belshazzar’s riddle is the identity of its sender and addressee.
And encrypted elsewhere within the riddle, I submit, are the identities of other involved parties.

Recall Daniel’s consonantal grid and its associated gematrial properties.
✅ The middle column (נקר) of our grid identifies the nationality of the man who’s about to enter the city,

since they have the same value as the word parsi (פרסי) = ‘a Persian’ (viz. 350).

They also happen to be an anagram of the word קרן = ‘a horn’,...
which associates the man in question with the Persian horn of ch. 8’s ram.

✅ The reinterpretation of 5.25’s peres-weights (parsin) as half-shekels rather than half-minas—a known manoeuvre in Mesopotamian sign-interpretation—hints at the identity of Cyrus’s Median counterpart,
since a meneh, a tekel, and (two) parsin amount to 62 shekels, which points towards the 62-year-old Darius (6.1). (Why would we be told Darius’s age if it wasn’t relevant in some way?)
✅ The letters in the rightmost column (מתף) provide confirmation of the identity of these two Medo-Persian kings,
since the letters מתף have the same value as the names ‘Darius’ (דָּרְיָוֶשׁ) and ‘Cyrus’ (כֹּרֶשׁ), viz. 520. (No other personal names attested in Scripture have a value of 520.)
✅ And, given the many contact points between the events of Daniel 5 and those foretold in Isaiah 45–47, the sum of all nine letters in our grid (viz. 961) hints at the identity of their divine author. Here’s how.
In the 45th chapter of Isaiah’s prophecies, God summoned Cyrus by name and said the loins/bladders of kings would be ‘loosened’ before him,

which is precisely what happened to Belshazzar (5.6!).
In Isaiah 46, God condemned Babylon’s idols of silver and gold, i.e., the idols present at Belshazzar’s feast.

And, in Isaiah 47, YHWH issued a challenge to Babylon’s sorcerers and stargazers—i.e., to the very individuals summoned by Belshazzar to read YHWH’s inscription—,
to which they failed to rise.

The text of Isaiah 45–47 describes all of these events from YHWH’s first person perspective (‘I am YHWH’, ‘I will take vengeance’, etc.), with the exception of one verse:
in 47.4, YHWH’s speech is interrupted by a statement put on the lips of the Israelites, namely, ‘Our Redeemer! YHWH of hosts is his name’ (גֹּאֲלֵנוּ יְהוָה צְבָאוֹת שְׁמוֹ),

which is the only statement of its kind in Isaiah 45–47...
...and has the same value as the letters in 5.26–28’s matrix (viz. 961).

Coincidence?
What if I told you all these things came to pass at the time when Libra—i.e., ‘The Scales’ (!)—had just become prominent in the skies over Babylon?

For more details, jamesbejon.substack.com/p/belshazzars-…

If encouraged, please Re-Tweet!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Bejon

James Bejon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesBejon

18 Apr
THREAD: We three kings of Israel aren’t.

SUB-TITLE: A method to Matthew’s apparent madness.

As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1-17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

P.S. Substack version available at the end.
As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1–17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

Between Abraham and Israel’s first great king (David) we have fourteen generations;

between David and Israel’s great disaster (the exile) we have a further fourteen;
and between the exile and Israel’s great deliverer (the Messiah) we have our final fourteen.

Every fourteen generations, an event of epochal significance takes place, which makes Jesus’ arrival right on cue.

‘It’s almost as if God planned it’, Bart Ehrman says.
Read 36 tweets
6 Apr
<THREAD>

Pharaoh & the NT’s birth narratives:

arguably not the most seasonal of threads, but then we’ve had a bit of snow in the UK today.

And let’s face it, it’s been a strange year all round.
Raymond Brown has written a 750-page monograph on Matthew and Luke’s birth narratives. That’s about 8,500 tweets’ worth.

On pp. 34–37, Brown says the two birth narratives are largely ahistorical.
Matthew would have mentioned Luke’s census if it had taken place, Brown says,

and Luke would have mentioned the massacre of the infants.

Let’s see if we think Brown’s right.
Read 82 tweets
23 Mar
THREAD: More on the Birth Narratives.

Each year, Nativity plays combine aspects of Matthew and Luke’s narratives into a single drama (or something like one).

The journey to Bethlehem, the shepherds, the wise men, a few camels for good measure (?):

so the list goes on.
No small number of scholars, however, see Matthew and Luke’s narratives as fundamentally at odds with each another.

‘Not only do they tell completely different stories about how Jesus was born’, @BartEhrman says, ‘some of their differences appear to be irreconcilable’.
So then, let’s see how different Matthew and Luke’s narratives really are.

Below are their main components, set out side by side (in what I take to be their implied chronological order).
Read 74 tweets
18 Mar
<THREAD>

Matthew and Luke’s genealogies are often dismissed as irreconcilable.

Elsewhere, I’ve tried to show that they’re not.

Here, I’ll simply highlight some of their numerical and thematic harmonies,

which, I claim, have significant implications.
Matthew’s genealogy (1.1–17) exhibits at least a couple of non-trivial properties.

First, it’s patterned around the numbers 14 and 42.

And, second, it contains multiple allusions to the notion of a Jubilee.
Consider, for a start, how Matthew’s genealogy is patterned around the number 14:

🔹 It traces the fulfilment of YHWH’s promise to Abraham (‘I will make of you a great nation…’: Gen. 12.2), which has a gematrial value of 1,400.
Read 17 tweets
15 Mar
<COVID THREAD>

Boris Johnson now says he thinks he should’ve locked down sooner.

Yet, last March, his chief scientific adviser—Sir Patrick Vallance—claimed his decision was the right one.

So does the PM think he should’ve *ignored* his scientific adviser?…(cont’d below)
If so, does that make him a ‘science denier’?

And from whom should he now seek advice?

Last March, Vallance said that, while a four-month lockdown would temporarily suppress the spread of Covid, it would make it return all the more severely in the winter,
and he said that ‘all of the evidence from previous epidemics’ supported him.

Was he right?

Would the winter have been *worse* had we locked down earlier/harder?
Read 10 tweets
6 Mar
<THREAD>

A dove,

a plant,

a voyage at sea,

a worm,

and a fish referred to both as a ‘dag’ (דג) and a ‘dagah’ (דגה)?

What do these things have in common?

For some suggestions, please join me on a somewhat experimental trip through the book of Jonah.
Prophets frequently embody aspects of their message.

Hosea marries a prostitute (and remains married to her) in order to depict his people’s unfaithfulness to God.

Ezekiel packs his bags and leaves Jerusalem in anticipation of the exile.
Jesus rides into Jerusalem on a donkey as a (literal) embodiment of the arrival of God’s king.

And Jonah, I submit, enacts his message in a similar way.
Read 78 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!