Electrolysers are the single biggest market. OEMs active across electrolysers and fuel cells can leverage manufacturing synergies to accelerate the cost curve for competitive advantage.
But stack manufacturing synergies will only get you so far. Balance of plant can account for as much as half of electrolyser system costs.
Important savings can come from closer coupling of electrolysers with renewable energy sources. Just yesterday @nelhydrogen announced its partnership with @FirstSolar
🚨ICYMI: Last week, @ETC_energy released two exciting deep dives; one on electrification, the other on #hydrogen
🧵with some of my favorite charts 👇(1/9)
🏭Debates around future hydrogen demand are heated, but we can all agree on it's importance for the industrial sector.
🔥 Small role in building heat
🚛🚢✈️Important role in transport, but sub-sectoral allocation varies
⚡️I'd say power is the wildcard here (2/9)
Here's a more detailed breakdown of ETC's scenarios. Power sector demand could be x3 what's displayed in the previous tweet. My takeaway is that the power sector could very well turn out to be the largest consumer of hydrogen. (3/9)
“e-hydrogen could turn into the largest electricity consumer and double power demand in Europe”
This idea is of course borne out of some outlandish hydrogen demand scenarios. The analysis we did with Aurora showed there’s no way we could power all that electrolysis affordably.
“The reconversion of gas plants into hydrogen turbines could lift combined cycle gas turbine operators Uniper, Engie and RWE.”
I have two words for the Goldman team: fuel cells.
I am convinced these will eat turbines in long term. Thermal assets are stranded assets.
Recent EU hydrogen strategy aims for 2x40 GW electrolyser deployment by 2030. Half within the EU, half in neighboring countries like Morocco and Ukraine.
What will EU hydrogen strategy mean for electrolyser prices? A minithread 👇👇👇 (1/7)
1) Assuming alkaline electrolysers 2) Using nel-Nikola deal with $350/kW as a reference point, realized in 2023 3) Applying 17% learning rate
Gives $112-136/kW by 2030, depending on deployment targets. (2/7)
By coincidence, these prices reminded me of batteries, another storage technology with a learning rate of ~18%. Plotting indexed prices shows similar pathways. But I believe that my electrolyser curve is not steep enough. (3/7)
Short rant: that’s one way to perpetuate the status quo. Hydrogen has some critical uses, but the extent of its penetration in consumer markets is a function of our attitude to waste and centralisation.
Circularity is gaining momentum as a key theme. Another key point is that energy companies are basically profit machines for the few. Take residential heat for example. Most profits from repurposing the gas grid will go to current owners.
Now imagine we built new, passive houses or energy co-ops instead. How many new jobs would that create? How much less energy would we need in the long run? How empowering and equitable would it be for communities?
Power to the people, by the people, for the people.