🚨ICYMI: Last week, @ETC_energy released two exciting deep dives; one on electrification, the other on #hydrogen

🧵with some of my favorite charts 👇(1/9)
🏭Debates around future hydrogen demand are heated, but we can all agree on it's importance for the industrial sector.

🔥 Small role in building heat

🚛🚢✈️Important role in transport, but sub-sectoral allocation varies

⚡️I'd say power is the wildcard here (2/9)
Here's a more detailed breakdown of ETC's scenarios. Power sector demand could be x3 what's displayed in the previous tweet. My takeaway is that the power sector could very well turn out to be the largest consumer of hydrogen. (3/9)
Hydrogen from electrolysis will become a competitive alternative to hydrogen from gas reforming with carbon capture *this decade*.

Locations with the best renewable resources might even produce hydrogen cheap enough to compete head-to-head with natural gas by 2030. (4/9)
💨The picture is of course more nuanced than 280 characters. Not everyone has the same brilliant insollation of Chile, and some have really low cost gas. So expect some gas-derived hydrogen, even in 2050. The critical point here is to ensure MINIMAL upstream leakage. (5/9)
💦Some may ask, what about upstream electrolytic hydrogen i.e. sustainability of water use?

The way I think about it, we'll end up with more water once we exchange fossil fuel extraction and processing for renewable hydrogen. (6/9)
How do we get hydrogen to where it's needed?

🥊Molecules vs. electrons💥

New electron infrastructure could be a better alternative than new pipelines.

Retrofitted pipelines are a good idea if they are in the right place.

Local production can be cheapest still (7/9)
🌱Nonetheless, even decarbonised hydrogen at $0.5/kg, will command a green premium in the absence of a carbon pricing mechanism. But green inflation is far less daunting, even negligible when spread along the value chain. (8/9)
🧑‍🏫If you found this educational, you ought to read the full report, because there is plenty more where that came from. Kudos to everyone involved in putting together this fantastic piece of work. (9/9)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gniewomir Flis

Gniewomir Flis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gnievchenko

4 May
Loving this chart from BCG: 120 equipment manufacturers active in upstream and downstream of hydrogen.

Source: bcg.com/en-gb/publicat…
Electrolysers are the single biggest market. OEMs active across electrolysers and fuel cells can leverage manufacturing synergies to accelerate the cost curve for competitive advantage.
But stack manufacturing synergies will only get you so far. Balance of plant can account for as much as half of electrolyser system costs.
Read 6 tweets
28 Sep 20
Everything you wanted to know about the #hydrogen economy but were too busy to research.

Part 2: International hydrogen markets could be a thing, but don’t bet on hydrogen shipping

1/18
In February I argued green H2 could undercut fossil H2 as early as 2030, conditional on two points:

1) Driving electrolyser capex below $250/kW, but more importantly

2) 1,500 hours per year of zero-cost green power per electrolyser

2/18

If the recent EU Hydrogen strategy comes to fruition, the first point should be easy.

But as hydrogen scales, 1,500 hours per year of free power per electrolyser would become increasingly hard to find.

3/18

Read 22 tweets
25 Sep 20
I see lots of excitement around Goldman Sachs July hydrogen note.

I think it’s a hack-job written with anchor bias from gas analysts. The entire ‘analysis’ can be recreated with a 4x4 excel table.

But let me throw some more shade.

marketwatch.com/articles/goldm…
“e-hydrogen could turn into the largest electricity consumer and double power demand in Europe”

This idea is of course borne out of some outlandish hydrogen demand scenarios. The analysis we did with Aurora showed there’s no way we could power all that electrolysis affordably.
“The reconversion of gas plants into hydrogen turbines could lift combined cycle gas turbine operators Uniper, Engie and RWE.”

I have two words for the Goldman team: fuel cells.

I am convinced these will eat turbines in long term. Thermal assets are stranded assets.
Read 6 tweets
16 Sep 20
Daimler announces expansion of their #EV truck line. Two new trucks coming in similar class:

Battery-electric eActros with 500km range going into serial production in 2024.

Fuel-cell electric GenH2 with 1,000km range. Trials in 2023 with serial production in “second half 2020”
eActros concept Image
And GenH2. You can see the additional fuel cell equipment housed in the black box behind cabin. Image
Read 8 tweets
17 Aug 20
Recent EU hydrogen strategy aims for 2x40 GW electrolyser deployment by 2030. Half within the EU, half in neighboring countries like Morocco and Ukraine.

What will EU hydrogen strategy mean for electrolyser prices? A minithread 👇👇👇 (1/7)
1) Assuming alkaline electrolysers
2) Using nel-Nikola deal with $350/kW as a reference point, realized in 2023
3) Applying 17% learning rate

Gives $112-136/kW by 2030, depending on deployment targets. (2/7)
By coincidence, these prices reminded me of batteries, another storage technology with a learning rate of ~18%. Plotting indexed prices shows similar pathways. But I believe that my electrolyser curve is not steep enough. (3/7)
Read 7 tweets
10 Aug 20
Short rant: that’s one way to perpetuate the status quo. Hydrogen has some critical uses, but the extent of its penetration in consumer markets is a function of our attitude to waste and centralisation.
Circularity is gaining momentum as a key theme. Another key point is that energy companies are basically profit machines for the few. Take residential heat for example. Most profits from repurposing the gas grid will go to current owners.
Now imagine we built new, passive houses or energy co-ops instead. How many new jobs would that create? How much less energy would we need in the long run? How empowering and equitable would it be for communities?

Power to the people, by the people, for the people.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(