We've serious doubts about Spanish death data, with hints pointing to 10x exaggeration from last summer.
Health Ministry produces daily reports, with ~10 or less deaths notified ONLY to be corrected 10x during following weeks.
Media systematically air over 100.
Thread.
Epidemics have TWO phases:
Epidemic phase, in which cases grow and decrease QUICKLY.
Basal phase, in which cases are stable AND LOW.
There's NO such thing as a high plateau. It makes NO epidemic sense.
It growths, it decreases or it's low and stable.
If we check Euromomo we notice the VERY HIGH (over 150 daily deaths plateau) produces NO EXCESS DEATHS.
It must produce more than a 10% excess, as expected all causes is 1.200 and we're out of winter high peak including seasonal epidemics, that could cover CV deaths.
During 1st wave, despite the chaos and lack of procedures, daily notified deaths only diverged for final corrected data in ~10%
Now the mistake, even with figures MUCH lower and procedures developed, it goes easily over 1.500%
We think this data, deaths notified every day, and NOT the corrected series appearing WEEKS after is the true Covid related deaths.
People sick enough to be in Covid radar at the time of DYING.
The rest are just PCR+ found in any other cause deaths after patient file revised.
We graph this series, and we find relevant things.
While official maximum was ~600, daily notified reached only ~90, more compatible with weaker Epidemic struggling against 1 year of widespread infection.
Susceptible pool is VERY different, MUCH SMALLER, than in 1st wave.
Another very important issue is it follows a known Epidemic shape, fitting so properly in Gompertz.
How could a curve made only of Human notification MISTAKE fit SO WELL in the EXPECTED natural shape?
So, only rational explain is just a few people (<10) are dying from respiratory deseases, linked to Covid or true Covid. The expected ratio we observed every year, including the so covidly '20
The other notified ~150 are only found after checking all cause deaths for old PCR+
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Los límites a la Incidencia Acumulada que nos imponen para volver a la normalidad son ANTICIENTÍFICOS, ARBITRARIOS e IMPOSIBLES DE CUMPLIR.
Su valor es SEIS veces más bajo que lo conocido por la Ciencia.
El Umbral de peligro Epidémico era de casi 60 casos/100K en tasa semanal.
El método se puede encontrar en los informes del RENAVE y es un estudio de las series históricas de la epidemia de virus respiratorios (sí, TAMBIÉN los coronavirus) para cada región, puesto que hay grandes diferencias en el complejo clima español.
Determina el límite REAL, sobre datos históricos, en el que la incidencia se observa epidémica en los resultados hospitalarios.
El dato ÚTIL: cuándo y dónde hay que empezar a prestar más atención o incluso reforzar la atención
Spain's (surely everywhere's) limits for Covid Incidence Rate are purely arbitrary, and politically decided to be impossible to accomplish.
They are SIX TIMES LOWER than scientifically calculated values.
What we considered NO RISK, basal phase, becomes MEDIUM (3/5) RISK in CV.
I finally could find the Epidemic Threshold for Influenza Like Illnesses.
It's defined by a serious study based in historical AND regional data relating Incidence Rate and hospital outcomes.
A useful tool too understand when epidemic occurs and extra attention should be paid.
Opposing arbitrary WORLDWIDE Covid monolithic criteria, it settles different statistical values for each region
Basal phase limit varies between 33-125 cases/100K a week.
It makes sense, Spain is complex, from Continental Castile to tropical Canarias.
Private companies are deciding what the truth is,&it's fear
Here, in YouTube policies on Covid, demonetization threatens influencers, if they don't accomplish Covid Narrative
Curious distress from restrictions ISN'T acceptable, while hospital images provide 'context of a story'
This a famous Spanish youtuber, with a music channel, in a video on Chopin.
While he refers to tuberculosis he AVOIDS to even say Covid in a virus/bacteria comparison, and he adds 'i don't want to say it, or YouTube will demonetize this video'.
Threaten works.
I get to know thanks to this tweet, and I get shocked by how nude censorship was operating.
Imagine if you just can name Covid in a casual comparison about Chopin's death, how harsh the punishment could be if you dare to critic the lesser Covid narrative
Everytime u hear a VARIANT explanation, always scary, be sure u're considered dumb
Now, it is the India variant
The process is always the same, variant detection, increase in cases and horrible local images in media: now, same Indian CPResuscitation and funeral pyres everywhere
Media Fear Porn on Indian Variant began last March.
Guess what was growing then in India?
Bingo
Testing DOUBLED
They're recurring India now cos brute numbers are HUGE
"Pandemic in India" is ONE FIFTH of the whole world's epidemic.
When POP scaled nothing special going on there
South Africa Variant?
Let's check.
SA variant media fear campaign began December '20.
Again, testing rocketed x4.
In this crazy antiscientifical system that means for times more CASES too.
WORST NUMBER OF CASES IN A DAY IN ANY COUNTRY, decorated with terrible burning corpses images.
At the same time the Indian Double Variant appears as The New Threaten.
A little detail is left apart:
~1.4 BILLION inhabitants
If we scale to Population India's figures we notice it's quite NOTHING extraordinary going on there.
Both cases and deaths are in what we experienced as low range for this crisis.
Talking about Armageddon in India today with similar, even lower, figures is pure PROPAGANDA.
Guess what is really growing?
As usual, tests.
In the last ~2 months, test pressure was more than DOUBLED.
Cases (and detected deaths) grow at test rates.
The old very same Fear Trick
They sold 3K deaths in China like The End of the World.
Are we stupid enough to swallow again?