First off, "the flu" is caused by influenzavirus. "Colds" can be caused by a wide range of viruses, a minority of them including coronaviruses, but none involving this branch (sarbecoviruses), which have a very different mode of action.
The...
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO reason why it's proven so hard to develop herd immunity to the flu and colds is specifically because they're so incredibly diverse. They've been evolving alongside humans since time immemorial, though new ones periodically transfer in from wild animals and certain random...
The general pattern for seasonal influenza and seasonal colds is that herd immunity tends to develop in northern climates in the northern winter...
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO for whatever strains were dominant that year, and they die off. This does not even remotely involve everyone catching the disease - usually only a small percentage of the population, but enough that - combined with everyone else's past immunity - it pushes R0 to back...
However, herd immunity tends to break in the opposite hemisphere or in the tropics as this happens, and they find new ground to mutate. Herd immunity breaks due to everyone's immunity slowly weakening over time while the virus slowly develops mutations to bypass...
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO it. Eventually R0 is greater than 1 with respect to a given population, and it only needs to be introduced to that population to sweep through.
This is happening not just with a single flu or cold strain, but a whole diverse array of hundreds of different vectors at...
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO once. Vs. COVID, which while certainly slowly diverging as all diseases do, does not have one iota of the biological diversity of today's range of cold and flu viruses.
Flu shots target the strains that are expected to be dominant that year, and they help, but have...
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO historically been nowhere near as effective as the new mRNA COVID vaccines, only target specific strains, and uptake rates are low. There's much work however going into more "universal" flu and cold vaccines that can target a wider range of viruses, with higher efficacy.
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO I do want to say that I think it's really unfortunate that the name "coronavirus" stuck for 2019-nCoV, rather than a more specific term. Coronaviridae is a whole broad family of viruses and says little about how each one behaves. It's sort of like if a new species of lion...
@SwingTraderCO@garnettca@Mista3rdEye@GovofCO ... moved into you r neighborhood, and the local press referred to it as the "cat outbreak", because they're in the same family as cats. Referring to it as a "lion outbreak" would give a far more accurate impression. 2019-nCoV should have been referred to as a *sarbecovirus*.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@BoringPrufrock I've always thought that Adelanto is the perfect setup to a stoner movie ;) Picture the scene:
It's midday and Elon is giving a press conference unveiling TBC's latest TBM - a (exaggerated for the sake of the movie) fully automated, battery-powered, compressed-earth-casing,...
@BoringPrufrock super-fast-tunneling beast. Meanwhile, two stoners in a nearby high school decide to escape detention. Nearly caught in the yard, they duck down into an old well, only to discover that it leads down into a tunnel where the TBM sits abandoned. Their curiosity gets the better of...
@BoringPrufrock them and they unintentionally start it up, blocking the tunnel with spoil behind them.
Realizing the potential of what they sitting on, they scheme to break into Shangra La, a local medical marijuana company that's been rumoured to have engineered the most potent cannabis...
@AukeHoekstra@truth_tesla Huh? Corrosion is one of molten salt's *biggest* problems. And thorium does nothing with respect to corrosion (it's also very immature and has a lot of problems).
But that's just the start of problems.
First off is the fact that you're dealing with toxic materials. And not...
@AukeHoekstra@truth_tesla toxic in the normal sense, but *insanely* toxic, where even vanishingly small amounts of many radioisotopes, quantities you wouldn't give a rat's arse about in any other industry, are too unacceptably toxic for release.
Nuclear produces a broad spectrum of all sorts of these...
@AukeHoekstra@truth_tesla insanely toxic compounds, and each has its own physical and chemical properties. It can be a solid, a liquid, a gas, mobile or immobile in salt, mobile or immoble in water, compatible with steel but not alumium, compatible with alumium but not steel, compatible with this alloy...
THREAD: For everyone who is making an argument akin to, "If Elon says it, then Karpathy must agree, and it must be true", let's take a look at just a tiny bit of the past five years of statements from Elon about FSD.
Remember back in early 2018 when you gained the ability to summon your car from NY to LA?
A friendly old man lives near me and occasionally comes up to chat. Earlier this year we idly started talking about the stock market and I mentioned how well $TSLA had performed and why I think the company was so promising. Just idle chit chat.
Fast forward to the other day. I..
... am outside working on my greenhouse-trailer and he comes up to chat. He brings up Tesla again, and mentions that the price was down to $600. I smile and mention that one who invested at orders of magnitude lower prices hardly loses sleep over these sort of swings. Then...
...he seemed a little nervous and informs me that, based on what I had told him in our previous chat, he had bought $TSLA at $800, only to see it crash (I had no idea he was thinking about investing).
This is a guy who has never even heard of Model Y or Cybertruck. No clue...
Thought: while not applicable to their initial purchases, @elonmusk may eventually end up with sea launch platforms that have no "platform" at all - just a tower.
Consider the new "rocket catching" approach. It's intriguing; it lets you cut a lot of mass off the rocket while...
letting you use as massive of a shock absorption system as you can dream up. Furthermore, a landed rocket cannot fall over. So long as it can navigate into roughly the right place, it's a good landing.
Now let's consider sea launch with a platform.
(1) Arm catches SH ...
(2) Arm rotates, sets it down (3) Some sort of strongback attaches to it to keep it stable and reconnect GSE. (4) Arm catches Starship (5) Arm aligns Starship with SH for remating. SH isn't attached to the tower, so this may take adjustment. (6) Something connects GSE to Starship
Hey @Transport_EU, @AdinaValean - exactly why is your
Team Leader for Automated/Connected Vehicles and Safety sharing an attack article sourced from a short seller against a company he's in charge of regulating? linkedin.com/feed/update/ur…
The bias was obvious, but this is blatant
Please tell me that the guy in charge of approving features knows the difference between an SAE level (what the vehicle *makes the driver do*, for whatever regulatory or liability reasons) vs. how good it actually is at driving.
Please tell me that the guy in charge of approving features knows that mandating driver attention for "FSD City Streets" (aka "FSD Beta") has *always been the case*, would have been a shock if it wasn't going to be in wide release, and that "FSD Beta" != "FSD".