Now that Josh Duggar has been indicted on possession of Child Sexual Abuse Materials (child porn), some depicting toddlers, we must confront the sexualization of children in evangelicalism.
Let's start with teenagers, and go all the way down to toddlers.
Shaunti Feldhahn, in For Young Women Only, tells girls "82% of boys feel little ability and little responsibility to stop the sexual progression." Telling girls that boys have "little ability" to stop legitimizes date rape and puts the blame at the girl's feet.
Furthermore, in a post to teenage girls, she warns that their date's dad will be tempted to "visually take in, linger on, and fantasize about all the details of this great body he's seeing." Let that sink in. Teens are being told that it is normal for adult men to sexualize them.
Every Man's Battle depicts a youth group volunteer in his 30s who inadvertently "has sex" with a 15 YO. They say she "looks more like twenty", & describe her as flirting. Paige Patterson, when in his 60s, relished describing a 16 yo's figure from the pulpit: "she looked fine."
And then there are the myriad of stories of teenagers being victims of clergy sexual abuse, and yet the blame is usually placed on them. Andy Savage, for instance, received a standing ovation from his congregation when he confessed to sexual abuse as a youth pastor.
Now let's go younger. When my youngest was 11, she was told by her female Sunday School teacher that she had to watch how she dressed now that she was developing, because adult men could get distracted by her. She was afraid to go to church for weeks.
In informal polls, readers have told me that as children and preteens they experienced more sexual harassment at church than anywhere else.
What about toddlers? In For Women Only, Shaunti Feldhahn is making a case for the "male brain", that men are visual from the earliest ages. She tells an unfortunate story of her son at 4: his "tummy felt funny" when seeing Victoria Secret models' tummies, sounding like arousal.
She tells a similar story in Through a Man's Eyes, where a 3-year-old gets an erection from looking at sewing patterns for women's underwear. She says men have this male brain whether they're "nine or ninety."
Curiosity is normal in toddlers. Playing doctor is normal. Touching one's genitals is normal, as is getting erections in boys. But adult male sexual response and arousal in pre-pubescent children? Definitely not normal.
If these stories were told in a pediatrician's office, they would warrant follow-up screening questions for child sexual abuse, according to my husband, an examiner in pediatrics for the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons in Canada.
Beyond that, this is the EXACT SAME argument made by pedophiles for lowering the age of consent. They argue that toddlers & young children have sexual feelings the same way adults do. Our evangelical resources should not be making the same arguments as pedophile lobbying groups.
What astonishes me is that nobody noticed this beforehand. These books have been bestsellers for years, and they sexualize children.
We need to make evangelical circles safe spaces for children, and that will only happen when we stop laying the blame for male sexual sin at the feet of women and girls; when we have zero tolerance for clergy sexual abuse; and when we stop talking about children as sexual.
For more on how evangelical resources often lay the blame for male lust & sexual sin at the feet of women, & how this affects women's marital & sexual satisfaction, see The Great Sex Rescue--based on our survey of 20,000 Christian women! tolovehonorandvacuum.com/great-sex-resc… #greatsexrescue
Best-selling evangelical books instruct women to give their husbands sex to deal with their husbands’ porn addictions.
If any reporters are working on stories about Josh Duggar, I’d love to give background on how wives in these communities are told his porn use is their fault.
We just conducted the largest survey ever done of evangelical women’s marital & sexual satisfaction for our new book The Great Sex Rescue. One of the things we were looking at was the teaching, “women should have frequent sex with their husbands to keep them from watching porn."
In November 2019, Focus on the Family, in their broadcast, said the reason men watch porn is that women aren’t having enough sex. Every Man’s Battle (the book series sold 4,000,000 copies) told women they were like a “merciful vial of methadone” for him when he’s quitting porn.
Can we talk COMPLEMENTARIANISM? What happens to marriage when couples act out the commonly taught doctrine that husbands make the final decision in marriage?
After surveying 20,000 women, we now know!
A thread with fun stats stuff:
Let's start with beliefs: 62.2% of Christian wives believe that a wife submitting to a husband's leadership is a way that she can love him. And 39.4% of wives believe that the husband should have decision-making power in the marriage.
And you know what? When women believe this, it doesn't affect their marriage. It's neutral--not good or bad.
UNLESS--and this is a big unless--they actually act it out.
You see, most people who believe this do not practice it.
So @markgungor said yesterday: "At it’s core, marriage is a sexual contract. Refusing sex to your partner is a violation of the contract."
In our recent survey of 20,000 Christian women, we found that his take on sexless marriages is completely off base. Here's how.
When women (1) have high marital satisfaction; (2) frequently orgasm during intercourse; and (3) have husbands who don't use porn, marriages almost NEVER become sexless. Sexlessness is a SYMPTOM of a greater problem. Women don't suddenly up and decide to give up on sex one day.
Now there are many reasons why a marriage might become sexless. In this thread, I'm only going to address the most common scenario: She never orgasms; she feels distant from her husband; and she's one of the 16% of women who say their primary emotion after sex is "feeling used."
It's time for the evangelical church to realize that the way we talk about sex and lust and porn poses a danger to women, as the Atlanta shooting all too horrifically showed us--and 8 people, including 7 women, died for it.
Apparently the shooter has said he had a "sex addiction" and the spas were "a temptation ... that he wanted to eliminate." This language sounds a lot like how Every Man's Battle describes the temptation to lust.
Defeating lust involves "bouncing your eyes" away from women. The 1st step is to "make a list of your greatest enemies." Among your potential enemies? Female joggers, or a "female co-worker who tends to dress a little suggestively." Or women at the beach.
Biblically, sex is INTIMATE, MUTUAL, and PLEASURABLE. The whole point of 1 Corinthians 7:3-5 is mutuality. And sex is about intimacy; God describes His relationship with us in sexual terms.
Therefore, any interpretation of 1 Corinthians 7 that says to women, “You need to allow your husband to use your body on demand, no matter what you are feeling,” is completely unscriptural and taking that out of context to weaponize it.