So now that the dust has settled on much of the elections - and away from the lazy media narrative the overall picture is a little bit more complex with good & bad news for Labour.

- a small post election thread -
2/

After the 2019 election debacle the new Labour leadership set its course on doing what most losing Social Democratic / left parties do in its position:
Holding back firm policy committments & instead rebuilding trust & competency & detoxifying the AS issue.
3/

Starmer is trying to copy what Labour did in mid1990s.
The good news first:
Its - partially - working.
..in the south graduate voters are turning their backs on Conservatives who just like the 1990s the Tories are becoming culturally unattractive to this demographic.
4/

So far so good.
Unfortunately Brexit is effecting voters a bit different to how imagined.
Its not that voters are enthused by Brexit but see it as a "change of govt".
This explains how many leave voters confuse voting for the govt by "voting for change"
5/

In this reading many Leave voters view the current govt as categorically different from the Cameron one from 2010-16 - even tho the Conservative party contains many of the same people.

This is diffcult for many remainers to grasp - but is only explanation that makes sense.
6/

This explains the split emerging:
Labour recovering in areas that traditionally dont vote for it
But not recovering in Brexit areas that vote for even tho Labour has accepted there is no 2nd referendum on horizon

It also explains rise of LibDems as...
7/

The LibDem seat count rises (somewhat counter-intuitively) when Labour moves to the centre - as soft Tories no longer fear Labour and feel comfortable voting LibDem.

Exactly what happened in late 1990s.

But problems remain...
8/

The Tories know this - but they believe culture wars not just around Brexit but around "brexity" cultural ideas and that post 2016 Conservatives are thus categorically different to pre 2016 Conservatives.

And guess what...its working.

So how do you defeat this...?
9/

Firstly how not to:
Dont keep the Brexit war going.
Dont fall into culture war traps.

What you do - must keep doing - is keep plugging away to voters on the continuity of the conservatives - Brexit or no Brexit.
10/ Starmer has been criticised for his caution - but hes only following the classic "post defeat - rebuild trust/competency 1st" strategy.

History will judge if he's done enough or done it well enough - but any leader would face the same dilemma.

But one thing is clear....
11/

The longer Labour allows itself to be portayed as wanting a 2nd referendum the easier it is for Johnson to portray himself as the real change - this plus good vaccination news in UK & western world gives him at least another 6 months without difficult polling questions.
12/

Remainers will bridle at this.
Some even suggest southern gains could compensate for losing more traditional Labour seats.

But this is a dangerous game and risks helping feed the very "labour have given up on Leave areas" narrative the Tories are trying so hard to promote.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick🇬🇧🇪🇺

Nick🇬🇧🇪🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicktolhurst

11 May
Most counterfactuals are convoluted & unlikely but this one simple & plausible.

John Smith dying when he did was perhaps one of the biggest “sliding door moments” in recent British history.

27 years ago on this day...
So the counterfactual:

1. Smith wins 97 election
2. UK doesn’t join Iraq war
3. Carries out similar new Labour program but with greater ties to traditional Labour than Blair managed
4. Hands over to Blair before 2010 election
5. Blair & Obama set tone for west into 21 century
6. Blair narrowly loses 2015 election as voters tire of Labour after almost 2 decades & global recession bites
7. Tory successor is mainstream Cameron (-like) who steers to centre right.
8. Trumps victory in 2016 sends centerist voters back to Labour in 2020 & Ed Balls become PM.
Read 4 tweets
10 May
Every decade or so the media will claim a new political paradigm & how politics will “never return to old normal again”. Then a few years later all these articles are conveniently forgotten.

The same is true of the current “left & right don’t matter anymore it’s open vs closed”.
2/

Sure we are still working thru Brexit effect but one of the reasons why voting patterns are changing is simply economic..as always.

Older home owning working class people are in wealth terms miles ahead of graduates in London renting flats or even rooms into their 30s.
3/

This wealth divide trumps many things and to a certain extent even blurs the income divide.

Being an income poor pensioner in a paid off house worth £200 000+ is simply a different prospect than being a pensioner in a council house in the 1970s.

And this divide is growing.
Read 5 tweets
7 May
+UPDATE+

The Jersey fishing dispute calms down as the EU admits that UK “broke legal obligations” and the Jersey govt met representatives of the French fishing industry to iron out any problems.

A forum is to be established to ensure their continued fishing in the waters.
2/

Representatives of the French fishing protest now believe they’ve won back their fishing rights and have committed to end protest so long as this remains the case.

French naval vessels pulling back & UK naval boats returning to Portsmouth.
3/

Interesting to see how this reported on in the serious press versus the...
Read 4 tweets
5 May
18 months ago I wrote a thread on “the inconvenient truth” of the election.

▶️ That age is now the determinant factor in British politics.

Northerners & the “left behinds”contrary to the media myth, didn’t vote for Brexit - home owning older voters did.

2/

So many people who fell for the “northerners voted Brexit” myth are now confused as to why these supposed “left behinds” vote Tory.

But it’s only once you deconstruct this myth can you see what’s really happening.

This also explains why London....

3/

Many London remainers even themselves but into the myth that the capital is thus (say it quietly) morally better: we at least voted remain & don’t vote Tory - but this is part of the same myth..

..and here why.
Read 8 tweets
4 May
Since Hartlepool constituency was founded in 1974 the combined votes of:

The Conservatives
UKIP/Brexit
& far right parties

...has ALWAYS been higher than 33% at election time.

The only exceptions were 1997, 2001 & 2005...

...when Tony Blair was leader of the Labour Party.
2/

Indeed for half the elections since 1974, the right + far right in Hartlepool got 40-60% of the vote.

The idea that Labour is suddenly struggling here because “it’s moved away from the left” or because “the red-wall has suddenly fallen for the right” simply doesn’t hold up.
3/

The idea that places like Hartlepool are moving away from Labour because “it’s not left wing enough”...

...is ahistorical nonsense promoted by people who are trying to shoehorn in a narrative that simply isn’t true and/or don’t know the area.
Read 9 tweets
2 May
+UPDATE+

Rumours circulating there may be more to UK & Norway’s failure to reach a deal than at 1st seems.

Original reporting stressed misunderstanding...

...it now looks like UK govt tried to force Norway to renegotiate Pre 1970s access - legal action cannot be ruled out now.
2/

From reports doing the rounds it seems UK overestimated Norway’s readiness to stick with PRE-EU fishing agreements.

IOW:
UK was geared for discussion on “status quo plus” - while Norway felt no legal obligation to even respect the existing status quo with post Brexit UK.
3/

Problem for UK negotiators is that Norway’s
1. Very rich
2. Part of the EEA
3. Fishing lobby is strong

Given this it’s unclear what UK could offer 🇳🇴.

In effect 🇳🇴 could simply tell 🇬🇧 “If you don’t like it - take us to court”.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(