Why do many modern teams & companies fail to achieve the clarity, progress, and results they so badly seek?

5 cognitive biases of modern organizations, a thread:
1/ Band-aids for Bullet Holes

Organizations tend to prefer sticking band-aids on serious bullet holes.

They do this due to 3 reasons:

- irrational optimism that the band-aid will work

- inability to diagnose the actual problem

- avoidance of the pain from fixing said problem
e.g.

Most Execution problems are really
1) Strategy problems, or
2) Interpersonal problems, or
3) Culture problems

Good leaders execute well because they understand this. They fix the root problem.

Bad leaders & their teams struggle because they are always applying band-aids.
h/t @taylorswift13 for saying “band-aids don’t fix bullet holes” (song: Bad Blood)
2/ The Proxy Illusion

As they grow in size & complexity, organizations tend to confuse the proxy for a thing for the thing itself.
Example:

The tragedy of most product organizations is that a 3 week delay for a product launch will cause much greater stress & scrutiny than an ill-conceived feature in the very same product.

On-time launch is often seen by sr mgmt as a proxy for the team’s product competence.
See this tweet for more examples of The Proxy Illusion within organizations:
3/ Bias Blind Spot

When organizations are making decisions, they rarely consider what cognitive biases might be affecting their decision quality.

After organizations have made a bad decision, they rarely consider their own cognitive biases as being a potential root cause.
4/ Certainty Theatrics

A surprisingly high fraction of every corporation’s time & resources are spent on pretending to itself that it is a highly rational entity that is capable of creating absolute certainty even in inherently uncertain situations.
The reality:

Some degree of uncertainty is a part and parcel of any complex business. The pressure for Certainty Theatrics at high-stakes meetings is at the root of many bad decisions.
Cortisol for Creativity (a corollary):

The trouble with most companies is that they give their employees a big dopamine hit for exhibiting their Analytical Intelligence in meetings but a cortisol rush for exhibiting their Creative Intelligence.
5/ Preventable Problem Paradox

Any complex organization will over time tend to incentivize problem creation more than problem prevention.

This bias leads to a “hero culture”, avoidable blunders & general execution slowness

A superb illustration of this bias by @_workchronicles
Alright, what can you do with all of this, as a manager or a leader?
The 4 vital steps you can take:

1) notice how these biases sneak into your organization’s work

2) share these biases & the vocabulary with your team

3) create the necessary psychological safety for them to point out these biases

4) take corrective action where it makes sense
Overall:
Understand
Observe
Act on the important stuff

I hope the awareness of these cognitive biases can be of some help in making your organization wiser and its people happier.

Best of luck to you!
More resources👇🏾
A thread on The Preventable Problem Paradox, and why it is hard to combat within complex organizations
A thread on a common example of Band-aids for Bullet Holes within organizations
Managers should set examples to help the organization combat Certainty Theatrics
A mega-thread on org psych & culture

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shreyas Doshi

Shreyas Doshi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shreyas

1 May
🗓️Recap of April 2021 content

Includes:
- A template for pre-mortems
- How product creativity dies
- False Positive Products
- Being more strategic
- B2B strategy primer
- Personal growth inhibitors
- Work stress
- Curated lists
- Internal roles
- Using logic
& much more....

👇🏾
A template that you can copy to run an effective (and fun) pre-mortem with your team for your upcoming launch (created via a collab with @coda_hq)
The hardest part of product creativity is not the ideation. It is the negotiation necessary to get the folks who are fixated on logic & math to appreciate the value of product creativity.
Read 23 tweets
23 Apr
Product leader anti-patterns (and resulting problems)👇🏾
First, a quick recap:

3 types of product leaders
The Operator
The Craftsperson
The Visionary

Think of them as hats rather than types, if you wish.

Product leaders can (and do) wear multiple hats.

But most usually have a primary or preferred hat.

Ref:
Note: There is no "one right" type or hat. Context matters most here.

It's useful to know these anti-patterns so we can spot them in ourselves, in the leaders we might hire or manage, in the leaders we might work for.

Can't fix what we don't see.

With that, the anti-patterns👇🏾
Read 12 tweets
19 Apr
Short thread on the strategy questions you need to answer for B2B products:

(a strategy primer in 10 tweets)
Your B2B product strategy must rigorously answer these 3 questions:

1) What customer segments are we targeting?

2) What differentiation will we create for them?

3) How will we reach these customers?
It really is that simple.

No fancy frameworks or data deluge necessary.

But the answers to these questions do require deep insight into the market, org dynamics, buyer psychology, customer goals, tech evolution, and lots of creativity.

Rigorous strategy is not easy.
Read 15 tweets
10 Apr
Five epiphanies and questions to logically tackle problem situations in business and life:
Before we get started:
These are based on my personal experience. I had these epiphanies at different points during my 20s & 30s i.e. an eternity ago🙂

Back then I was proud of my logical thinking, so I used logic to convert them into questions to ask myself in these situations.
Situation:
When I am feeling offended

Epiphany:
Feeling offended is a “me” problem, not a “them” problem

Questions to ponder:
If their words can spark so much inner disarray & disturbance within me, is the power with me or with them?

The effect:
Acceptance→Growth
More control
Read 9 tweets
6 Apr
Reason #17 why PM is different at Megacorps vs. Startups:

At a Megacorp, you want to avoid False Negative Products i.e. products you *should* have built, but did not.

At a Startup, you want to avoid False Positive Products i.e. products you should *not* have built, but you did.
Am I implying that PM at Megacorps is "worse" than PM at Startups?

Or that the Megacorps that try to avoid False Negative Products (FNPs) are wrong?

Or that Startups must move slower to avoid False Positive Products (FPPs)?

Not at all

There is no One Right Answer for everyone
When you are a Megacorp, it is smart & rational to avoid False Negative Products (FNP), particularly in an area which could be a meaningful threat to your core business further down the road.

Why?

The Upside-Downside framework answers that for us:
Read 7 tweets
5 Apr
Impediments to personal growth:

1) Thinking “I am very different!”

2) Fixating on Bezos, Musk, Gates

3) Requiring incontrovertible proof

4) Judging the source, not the idea

5) Wanting immediate improvement

6) Seeking just tactics, not principles

7) Learning to avoid doing
Read on for more details👇🏾
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(