So MSM @BBCNews@SkyNews@Reuters
etc lets see you report some actual science news: skeptic community ARE the scientific ones. You & @NHSuk etc gaslighted them suggesting we blindly follow SAGE with appeal to authority when patently obvious policies NOT grounded real science
Also social media police have HUGE repsonsibility for deterring questioning of narratives through banning people on spurious excuses.
The fact these unscientific polices destroyed the livelihoods of millions, causing starvation in nations with less of a safety net, is enough to DEMAND now a #Nuremberg2 . The taking down of philanthropy funding that unscientific policy needs to result and assets seized to pay
compensation to all badly affected, and if collusion proven prison beckons for many academics big pharma WEF & WHO etc etc. This was WWIII against the masses without scientific foundation, & poss for disruptive financial end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@sandy_brighton@vicsinghb Thx hopefully you can see its why we want to be left alone by nanny state & m/c intellectuals contemptuous what we about & wrongly seeing nationalistic/community/cultural defence=racism. Quite contrary. Be real trouble if they try to ban/tax meat same goes for @conservatives
@sandy_brighton@vicsinghb@Conservatives And while I am working class dragged up on council estate, I soon became Arts & Ents officer my Uni site and a thorn in side Labour Union mafia; and I fought tooth and nail to get public entry to Uni events so I could see what hypocrite elitists they really were: all busy getting
@sandy_brighton@vicsinghb@Conservatives buildings named after Nelson Mandela & supporting IRA, while wetting themselves when load of black rude boys turn up to a college Mod night, and loads of older Irish folk at a racing night. I studied via anthropology re youth culture & indigenous people btw usurping the sociology
So you tight chattering class Guardian reading fake BLM avocado munching *kittens* wake tfu & appreciate livestock not only better share land with biodiversity than crops but also unlike crops have myriad sustainable co produce linked value livelihoods & culture. Support THAT &
And it's same everywhere. You're being defrauded by pseudoscience from the WEF elite, based on number abstraction devoid of ACTUAL observation or understanding of other consumerism a pale subsititute to durability of animal textiles/hide etc & extended skilled livelihoods/culture
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo Once more, this is pseudoscience constructed without regard for other human consumerism all in battle for same resources. Land use, eg destroying China's pasture at rate of 1.5 million a yr is what is driving their soya feed for pigs, and its for WASTEFUL models of business which
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo we did perfectly well with until a few decades ago. Indeed livestock while they may use up a lot of land, it is often marginal or sparing pastures to recover, and shared with the most robust biodiversity next to the rotten evils of monocrops pesticides, chemical fertilizers &
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo extra resources need for them whereas livestock provided tallow butter wool leather etc from same the MOST sustainable/bioddegradable. I have no clue how you sleep at night Richard not taking this on board, and weaving a construct which thankfully the public can see right through
@paulwarmo@Bentonbag@1GarethWynJones Are you that daft you even need it explained?
On water use for eg?
Poore is a vegan, & an associate of 'pre-emptive activism' company with big corporate clients. The study masqueraded as big data but was only 0.02% of farms globally, and was gathered from internet studies,
@paulwarmo@Bentonbag@1GarethWynJones rather than observation. Huge areas were left out completely and there was no rigorous method to compare like with like. It's bad science. As for the exports v imports argument, LOOKING at actual differences in the specific farming/markets/food is more enlightening. So, for eg
@paulwarmo@Bentonbag@1GarethWynJones China has moved from an agricultural society to a heavily industrialized society over last few decades & continues relentless losing 1.5 million hectares of pasture a yr - not far off the size of Wales. This has also caused pressure on its grassland wildlife too of course, if you
A thread on pop culture warnings of the tech elite.
What part of T.H.R.U.S.H. didn't people get was villainous?
"Technological Hierarchy for the Removal of Undesirables and the Subjugation of Humanity"
Unfortunately there's no Kuryakin or Solo to save us we have to do it...
The Borg, in Star Trek: a glimpse in to hive mentality of drone cyborgs serving the collective. Of course a network of geeks who really didn't like Ayn Rand, & love big tech, would rather you forget this as they appear to have & attempt to justify it....
Resistance is NOT Futile
Then another warning from Start Trek: the 'plant based' narrative mob don't like being questioned....
Idea of 'food systems' is a false construct purposely deigned to stitch up meat. 'Scientific' FRAUD. Livestock MUCH more. Here sheep fur coat 1939 fed 2k people at time,+30-80 wool garments/carpet; tallow lanolin etc. Saved generations fossil fuel heat still in use. Synthetics by
contrast produce NO food, and are driving fashion industry's considerable 10% emissions. Only thing near as good as wool is hemp & again not durable (It's sacking) or quality, & does not feed. Cotton doesn't either, & indeed the Aral Sea was responsible in just 20 yrs for
eradicating of an important local food source & 24 endemic species of fish extinct. Crops that are for food, generally do not clothe (at least without use plastic added). Neither synthetic/crop clothing as durable as animal sources, thus you need constant replacement production,