@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo Once more, this is pseudoscience constructed without regard for other human consumerism all in battle for same resources. Land use, eg destroying China's pasture at rate of 1.5 million a yr is what is driving their soya feed for pigs, and its for WASTEFUL models of business which
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo we did perfectly well with until a few decades ago. Indeed livestock while they may use up a lot of land, it is often marginal or sparing pastures to recover, and shared with the most robust biodiversity next to the rotten evils of monocrops pesticides, chemical fertilizers &
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo extra resources need for them whereas livestock provided tallow butter wool leather etc from same the MOST sustainable/bioddegradable. I have no clue how you sleep at night Richard not taking this on board, and weaving a construct which thankfully the public can see right through
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo I see when your patrons at the WRI include global corporates invested in greenwash and hypocrisy like IKEA who BROKE the model of sustainable furniture that lasts CENTURIES for disposable furniture that doesn't last, and commits to constant use of resources, AND deforestation
@waiterich@TyRBeal@matthewhayek@NutritionMadeS3@NicholasDCarter@brentloken@jessfanzo you may be compromised, but I appeal to your better nature to STOP this nonsense & tell truth about whose businesses really destroying environment rather than scapegoating meat. Of course, that wouldn't make Mr Gates one your other patrons happy would it? Pipers & tunes...
@paulwarmo@Bentonbag@1GarethWynJones Are you that daft you even need it explained?
On water use for eg?
Poore is a vegan, & an associate of 'pre-emptive activism' company with big corporate clients. The study masqueraded as big data but was only 0.02% of farms globally, and was gathered from internet studies,
@paulwarmo@Bentonbag@1GarethWynJones rather than observation. Huge areas were left out completely and there was no rigorous method to compare like with like. It's bad science. As for the exports v imports argument, LOOKING at actual differences in the specific farming/markets/food is more enlightening. So, for eg
@paulwarmo@Bentonbag@1GarethWynJones China has moved from an agricultural society to a heavily industrialized society over last few decades & continues relentless losing 1.5 million hectares of pasture a yr - not far off the size of Wales. This has also caused pressure on its grassland wildlife too of course, if you
A thread on pop culture warnings of the tech elite.
What part of T.H.R.U.S.H. didn't people get was villainous?
"Technological Hierarchy for the Removal of Undesirables and the Subjugation of Humanity"
Unfortunately there's no Kuryakin or Solo to save us we have to do it...
The Borg, in Star Trek: a glimpse in to hive mentality of drone cyborgs serving the collective. Of course a network of geeks who really didn't like Ayn Rand, & love big tech, would rather you forget this as they appear to have & attempt to justify it....
Resistance is NOT Futile
Then another warning from Start Trek: the 'plant based' narrative mob don't like being questioned....
Idea of 'food systems' is a false construct purposely deigned to stitch up meat. 'Scientific' FRAUD. Livestock MUCH more. Here sheep fur coat 1939 fed 2k people at time,+30-80 wool garments/carpet; tallow lanolin etc. Saved generations fossil fuel heat still in use. Synthetics by
contrast produce NO food, and are driving fashion industry's considerable 10% emissions. Only thing near as good as wool is hemp & again not durable (It's sacking) or quality, & does not feed. Cotton doesn't either, & indeed the Aral Sea was responsible in just 20 yrs for
eradicating of an important local food source & 24 endemic species of fish extinct. Crops that are for food, generally do not clothe (at least without use plastic added). Neither synthetic/crop clothing as durable as animal sources, thus you need constant replacement production,
@docmartincohen@StartsWithABang But can't even tell you the football results, & sneers at those who take interest in such things. Whole manner can be elitist who thinks their authority is unquestionable, yet prone to making the most basic mistakes, & even engage in fraud for either money or pure conceit
@docmartincohen@StartsWithABang or worse still, beliveing their lie is justified in pursuit of some nebulous 'greater good' without appreciating the harm it can do and scornful of those that warn. Lockown science a clear example of this, as was the huge death toll contributed to by refusal to consider
@docmartincohen@StartsWithABang fever hospital protocol tried & tested for an experiment. That is sheer arrogance, and it FAILED yet still they push it oblivious to the huge amount of counter evidence, and the opinion of now well over 50k scientists and health professionals signatory to Great Barrington Dec.
@oatly@CotswoldLadyB Patently FALSE.
FACTS
1.Cattle herd Brazil increased as deforestation decreased.
2.Very little feed 4 cattle.
3.90% Brazil's cattle pasture fed & beef production can be increased reducing emissions via such without deforestation (de Silva et al)
4.63% soya UK human use little👇
@oatly@CotswoldLadyB little cattle (Sus Food Trust) 5. Much cattle feed waste(FAO confirmed) as is pig feed but Oatly know all about that massive crop waste unsuitable human use 6. Pig/poultry main soya feed use: reason China losing 1.5 mill hectares yr pasture for tech, fast fashion etc 👇
@oatly@CotswoldLadyB consumerist industrialization, This is why it is pseudoscientific deceit to talk about 'food systems' isolated from other consumerism, which causes pasture loss & need for soya feed for pigs etc & of course some of that consumerism is DUE to move away from leather, wool etc co 👇
@fleroy1974@hairyhillfarmer Don't forget to add in the move from livestock provided co produce such as wool leather etc to fast fashion tat not durable so massive production for stuff that doesn't last a yr, or insulate (wool/sheepskin considerable fossil fuel heat saving pp). Because its hard to calculate,
@fleroy1974@hairyhillfarmer doesn't man it's not hugely important. So eg this coat has lasted since 1939 (fed 2k people at time) + produced 30-80 wool garments life shearings. Millions were made affordable practical & warm little cleaning if ever required, many have lasted they are not rare; ladies
@fleroy1974@hairyhillfarmer wore them as housecoats & threw over bed in cold weather. By contrast the average life on a fast fashion store coat now is 1 yr. So if we say, the mouton coat lasts 80 yrs, that saves cost of manufacture 80 coats synthetic made from crude oil same time. This is responsible for