#Thread: How YouTube’s inaction facilitated the spread of the French COVID-19 conspiracy documentary Hold-up, the Plandemic “à la française”.
The French COVID-19 conspiracy movie Hold-up was released on 11 November 2020 & started to circulate on YouTube that same day. French fact-checker AFP Factuel flagged in Hold-Up more than 30 misleading or false claims linked to the COVID-19 pandemic. 2/n
We identified 14 viral occurrences of the Hold-up documentary on YouTube, which generated a total of more than 4.5 million views on the platform. 3/n
Out of these 14 full versions of Hold-up, 12 of them were still available on YouTube on 10 May 2021. They had accumulated between 11k and 306k views since November 2020. 4/n
The 2 other viral versions of Hold-up remained on YouTube for at least 1 month & 3 months respectively after its release, generating more than 3.5 million views. They were removed before May 2021. 5/n
Despite the heavy media controversy around Hold-up in France, - it was dubbed the Plandemic “à la Française” - YouTube’s efforts to reduce the spread of this harmful documentary have been at best extremely slow. 6/n
This inconsistent reaction also has consequences on other platforms. It means that YouTube videos including the Hold-up conspiracy movie have been continuously disseminated on other social media. 7/n
The discrepancy between YouTube’s quick reaction to limit the spread of Plandemic (USA) and its actions against Hold-up (France) raises numerous concerns. Videos infringing the same policies encounter different enforcement in different countries. 8/n
Our study also highlights the need to build a response to address loopholes used by malign actors to spread disinformation. The dissemination of YouTube links containing conspiracy theories on Facebook or Twitter means a shared responsibility to counter disinformation. 9/n
We reached out to YouTube with a few questions on the persistent presence of Hold-up on the platform. We did not receive any answer from YouTube, but all videos have been made unavailable on 11 May 2021. 10/n
However, YouTube provided comments to Politico, which covered our study. 11/n
In addition to #BadSources, @Knack & @lesoir published stories on a Brussels-based think tank, following up on our previous work and leads. They confirm that the South Asia Democratic Forum received substantial funding from offshore & opaque organisations. knack.be/nieuws/storyki…
ICYMI, the SADF is one of the Brussels stakeholders depicted in our EP Today and Indian Chronicles reports. We showed that its creation was directly tied to the Srivastava Group's efforts to influence policymakers in Brussels. @lesoir sums it up here: lesoir.be/496897/article…
So, who are the SADF funders? Based on information collected by @Knack, the SADF had received funding from the 'European Foundation for International Development', 'Transworld Partners Ltd' and 'Euro Corporation Ltd', amongst others.
#BadSources - our latest investigation into how Indian news agency ANI repeatedly quoted non-existent bloggers, experts, journalists and think tanks spreading anti-Pakistan/China narratives in India. 🧵1/N
To ease your reading, we've shortened ANI's #BadSources to BS in this thread. 2/N
It all started when we took another look at IFFRAS, a Canada-based think tank we had already exposed in our previous #IndianChronicles investigations. 3/N
#DOPPELGANGER: How Russia-based actors cloned legitimate media outlets from multiple countries (🇩🇪🇬🇧🇫🇷🇮🇹🇱🇻🇺🇦) to spread disinformation designed to undermine the support for Ukraine.
This independent investigation is solely based on open-source information and is built upon the first leads from @tonline. We also would also like to thank @AFPfaktencheck for reaching out to us.
Today, the EU DisinfoLab publishes an Open Letter signed by over 50 leading experts on disinformation calling on EU policy-makers to tackle disinformation head-on in the Digital Services Act 👇disinfo.eu/advocacy/open-…
Co-signatories include researchers, educators, journalists, academics, digital rights & democracy activists, campaigners against hate speech and online gender-based violence. We have organisations from across the 🇪🇺, including: 🇫🇷🇩🇪🇫🇮🇧🇪🇳🇱🇭🇺🇱🇹🇨🇿🇸🇰🇸🇮🇵🇱🇬🇷🇨🇾🇲🇹🇧🇬🇭🇷 & beyond 🇬🇧🇨🇭🇺🇸🇵🇰🇵🇭
There is a tendency in Brussels to frame the question of legislating on disinformation as a trade-off between free expression or authoritarian control of our online environment. But there is a middle ground.
📢Today we release our publication "The Many Faces Fighting #Disinformation", a panorama of innovative, multidisciplinary actors safeguarding our information ecosystem. We wanted to understand their successes and their challenges. (1/19)
They are rising to the #disinformation challenge with new types of expertise, like #OSINT, crowdsourcing, and data activism. They explore unusual partnerships and experiment with innovative techniques. This is a new sector taking shape. (2/19)
They also face novel challenges and risks. Despite their critical role in our information ecosystem, many civil society actors in this space struggle to make their voices heard. Their security and sustainability are not assured. (3/19)
New research: Disinformation that wrongly links COVID-19 and 5G technology often remain undetected. @DisinfoEU researcher @NetoSessa examines moderation shortcomings on Twitter and YouTube. Thread ⬇️ (1/8) disinfo.eu/publications/5…
As the pandemic unfolded, @Twitter and @YouTube vowed to remove content that breached their policy guidelines. They pledged to provide the community with reliable and real-time information, in particular regarding disinformation linking 5G technology to the coronavirus. (2/8)
However, we still notice significant time delays and discrepancies in their enforcement. This leads to false information remaining on these platforms for months before it gets labelled or removed (3/8)