This feels rather like the Brexit political economy chickens coming home to roost. 👇
As experts stressed before & after the referendum, the politics of trade deals comes down not just to aggregate economic outcomes but industrial/sectoral interests...
...In theory everyone wins economically from reducing trade barriers.
In practice the economic impact is uneven across different sectors of the economy - and that's often a political barrier to doing trade deals...
...The government's own modelling analysis shows a positive (albeit small - 0.01-0.02%) long run impact on UK GDP from a UK-Australia free trade deal...
...but UK agriculture experiences a negative impact in the government's (completely standard) modelling...
...why?
Because Australia has a comparative advantage when it comes to agricultural production (think land, weather but also, perhaps, lower standards)...
...Which is why the government's analysts concluded that:
"Australian producers may be able to supply domestic retailers and downstream producers at lower cost than domestic [UK] producers"....
...So we really shouldn't be surprised that the agricultural lobby is fighting hard (via Defra) against this US-Australia free trade deal - the government's own analysis says it will be harmful to UK farmers....
...And the apparent power of that lobby arguably shouldn't be surprising to a government that prioritised the interests of the economically tiny but politically influential fishing sector over the vast financial services sector in the Brexit negotiations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The idea stronger growth this year means Sunak can cancel future tax rises seems confused to me - or at least an incomplete analysis.
Brief thread 🧵
Assuming no public spending changes, when it comes to pressure for tax rises to balance spending with tax revenues...
....what matters is the projected structural deficit *after* the recovery is complete.
And what determines *that* will be the scale of long-term scarring to GDP (i.e the level of GDP relative to pre-crisis expectations)...
The Bank is currently projecting 1.25% GDP scarring...
....A faster recovery to a lower (scarred) path of GDP doesn't change the size of the post crisis structural deficit & longer term pressure for tax rises.
For that to happen you need projections of lower scarring...
In the wake of the Bank of England’s latest forecasts the media is full of talk of an economic “boom”.
💥💵📈
One headline this morning even calls it a *supersonic* boom.
What to make of that kind of talk?
A thread…🧵
...It’s true GDP growth of 7.25%, the Bank's latest forecast for 2021, would be the largest calendar year expansion since 1941 when Britain was still scaling up production to fight the Nazi menace...2/
...But, as we shouldn’t need reminding, this follows the worst year for the economy in three centuries in 2020...3/