For those pretending the recommended 4-month delay in vaccine doses was an example of Trudeau gov't foresight, the claim is nonsense. The decision was solely based on Canada's vaccine shortage as confirmed by the chair of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization. (cont'd)
When asked by Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner at the Commons house committee: “Would you (NACI) have made that recommendation if there had been more supply?” NACI Chair Dr. Caroline responded:
“Of course not.”
'If we had had enough vaccines to vaccinate all Canadians quickly and at least those most at risk with two doses of vaccines, we would not have needed to extend the interval ... Given the scarcity of vaccines, you have to make the best decision given what you have."
If it turns out that delaying the vaccines dose intervals saves lives that's great. But it had nothing to do with Trudeau gov't foresight, contrary to political spin.
Clarification: The chair of NACI's full name is Dr. Caroline Quach-Thanh.
Finally, when the UK made the decision to extend the dose interval of the Oxford-developed AstraZeneca vaccine up to three months (not four), it already had, research data suggesting it would increase its efficacy, unlike Canada.
Feb. 24, 2021 — A new analysis shows that a 3-month interval between doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine might be better than a shorter interval.
medicalnewstoday.com/articles/astra…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lorrie Goldstein

Lorrie Goldstein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunlorrie

26 Feb
Oh fer cryin' out loud, you're the AUDITOR GENERAL! AG Defends Ties To Lobbyist | Blacklock's Reporter blacklocks.ca/ag-defends-tie… #cdnpoli
'Auditor General Karen Hogan yesterday defended her ties to a Liberal lobbyist. Hogan awarded sole-sourced contracts to a lobbying firm and fed them confidential copies of her audits months before they were available to MPs and senators.'
"I have taken a look at the contracts,” said Hogan. “We followed the contracting rules set out by the government.”
Hogan’s office in 2020 awarded a $24,800 sole-sourced contract to lobbyist Susan Smith of Bluesky Strategy Group Inc. of Ottawa.
Read 6 tweets
21 Jan
CBC: Canada won't receive any Pfizer shots next week — here's what you need to know about the vaccination campaign:

(1) Deliveries of the Pfizer vaccine will drop by 50 per cent over the next four weeks, delaying some appointments cbc.ca/news/politics/… #cdnpoli
(2) Pfizer isn't treating every customer the same way. While Canada will receive zero doses next week, the company said it "will be back to the original schedule of deliveries to the European Union beginning the week of January 25."
(3) When asked why Pfizer will not make the same commitment to Canada, federal Public Services and Procurement Minister Anita Anand said that she expects the company to treat all countries equitably — but could not say why Canada has been singled out.
Read 5 tweets
21 Dec 20
Oh, look: The federal environment department says that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's new carbon tax combined with his looming clean fuel standard will disproportionately hit low-income earners, the middle class, seniors, single moms and contribute to energy poverty.
'It is expected increases in transportation fuel & home heating expenses would disproportionately impact lower and middle-income households, those living in single detached households ... those without control over the energy efficiency of their dwellings that use heating oil ...
" ... as well as households currently experiencing energy poverty or those likely to experience energy poverty in the future ... single mothers are more likely to live in lower-income households, and may be more vulnerable to energy poverty ... "
Read 14 tweets
20 Dec 20
I don't agree it's this bad but the idea 80% of households gets more in federal carbon tax rebates than they pay out in carbon taxes needs a reality check for several reasons: See below:
1) The claim depends on information the public doesn't have easy access to.
(2) It's based on formulas not easily understood
(3) The gov't emphasizes direct carbon taxes on gas & natural gas but de-emphasizes indirect costs passed on by businesses to the public.
(4) Large families and rural residents pay higher carbon taxes than smaller, urban ones, regardless of income.
(5) It may be true most households get more in rebates than they pay in taxes -- the credible Parliamentary budget officer says that's the case. But 80%? I'm skeptical.
Read 4 tweets
19 Dec 20
Why are people sending me outdated reports about the BC government's carbon tax by third parties? I'm using the actual data from the BC government.
Once again:
'The Climate Action Secretariat prepares and publishes the Provincial Inventory annually, with up to a two-year delay to allow time to assemble the information. The 1990-2018 Provincial Inventory was published in August 2020.'
'In 2018, BC's gross greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as reported in the Provincial Inventory, were 67.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e). This is an increase of 4.5 MtCO2e (7%) from 63.4 MtCO2e in 2007, the baseline year for our emission reduction targets.'
Read 6 tweets
19 Dec 20
You're the 2nd person who has cited this study. It's from 2015 which means it's based on data before that. My #s come from 2020 from the BC govtt itself based on its latest available data from 2018. (see below). Also, B.C. already has the highest carbon tax in Canada.
'In 2018, BC's gross greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, as reported in the Provincial Inventory, were 67.9 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e). This is an increase of 4.5 MtCO2e (7%) from 63.4 MtCO2e in 2007, the baseline year for our emission reduction targets.'
'Net emissions in 2018, after including 1.0 MtCO2e in offsets from forest management projects not covered in the inventory, were 66.9 MtCO2e. This is an increase of 3.5 MtCO2e (6%) from 2007.'
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(