My presentation at the @NDTAHQ Surface Force Projection Conference questioned the need for national merchant marines by examining China and Russia's use of their own to exert hegemony from the past to the present.
The Maritime Silk Road of China's #BeltandRoad Initiative aims to defend their vital trade routes - particularly between Asia & Europe/Africa - and ensure an adequate supply of raw materials and imports to sustain their economy and country.
The historical antecedent may have been the voyages of Zheng He. When the Ming Dynasty assumed power they aimed to ensure the restoration of China as the Middle Kingdom. Their fleet demonstrated the power of China and then was scrapped as trade flowed.
The early 19th century witnessed China's attempt to control its trade & its defeat at the hands of the British and the East India Company. China was forced to concede a 99 year lease of Hong Kong - something that China is doing today along Maritime Silk Road.
Russia, a continental power, in the early 20th century confronted a new world power that was ridiculed as being inferior. When Russia was denied use of the Suez, its fleet sailed around Africa and was destroyed at Tsushima.

Did the closing of a chokepoint impact its fate?
By the mid-20th century, the Sino-Japanese War saw China being systematically cut off from the outside world by Japan. The US embargo to Japan resulted in war, and this 1937 map discusses a blockade of Japan - a strategy that was emulated in Operation Strangulation.
China's COSCO fleet is the largest shipping line in the world, with a well-balanced cargo carrying capacity. Their domestic shipbuilding infrastructure supports the PLAN.

Russia's SOVCOMFLOT is foreign built & specialized in energy from the Arctic, but Russia's navy is lacking.
What if instead of #EverGiven going ashore in Suez, it was COSCO Galaxy in front of her?
Would Egypt be holding her?
How would China react?
The base at Djibouti is strategically placed for such a response. Would this deter Egypt?
Is PLAN geared for peer-to-peer or trade defense?
The Belt & Road has a maritime strategy associated with it. It is expanding into the South Pacific, Arctic, west Africa, and South America. Should one route close, there are alternatives.

The US had a strategy in 1920, but it has waned.

Who is the better Sea Power today?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sal Mercogliano 🚢⚓🧭🐪🚒

Sal Mercogliano 🚢⚓🧭🐪🚒 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mercoglianos

5 May
1/The latest from @LexNextDC in @TheNatlInterest on #sealift. The focus in the article is on the 45 surge sealift ships held by @DOTMARAD and 15 by @MSCSealift being 45 years old & declining readiness. It focuses on some options but misses the biggest problem...
2/"Buying new ships built in U.S. shipyards is prohibitively expensive. Building new ships in foreign yards is politically and strategically unattractive."

This leaves few options to rectify this situation and ensure the US can deploy forces from CONUS...
3/Option one is, "to purchase commercial vessels which would then be converted to become militarily useful for the Ready Reserve Force."

The problem is the commerical market is on fire and ship prices have spiked, nearly quadrupled.

gcaptain.com/hot-market-qua…
Read 9 tweets
5 May
@DavidLarter @SamDavaham @ConsWahoo @JerryHendrixII @cdrsalamander 1/The Liberty ship could carry 10k tons at 11.5 knots and took days to weeks to load/unload. ULCS can sail at 24 ktsband carry 200k and offload in a port in about 2 days.

The US maintains a fleet of geared & fearless containerships through the Maritime Security Program...
@DavidLarter @SamDavaham @ConsWahoo @JerryHendrixII @cdrsalamander 2/MSP provides $5M/ship/year for 60 vessels=$300M. The ships provide capacity and service on key routes for the military - such as APL western Pacific routes. They also provide employment for crews who can be used for surge sealift in @DOTMARAD & @MSCSealift...
@DavidLarter @SamDavaham @ConsWahoo @JerryHendrixII @cdrsalamander @DOTMARAD @MSCSealift 3/The cost barely covers the differential to remain US flag, the ships are all foreign built, and the capacity is not enough to sustain a true peer-to-peer conflict. Currently the US merchant marine has a total of 180 ships.

COSCO has over a 1000.

lines.coscoshipping.com/home/Services/…
Read 5 tweets
2 May
The @USNavyCNO in his testimony #HASC placed #sealift for @US_TRANSCOM @MSCSealift @DOTMARAD as the second strategic area for the ship construction budget, behind Columbia SSBN.

His concept is to buy old versus build new.

This is the WRONG APPROACH.
1/

appropriations.house.gov/events/hearing…
2/The @USNavyCNO notes that it would cost $300-500 million to obtain new ships, vice used ships at $20-25 million with 20 years of life. Here is what is wrong with that statement.

First, their market analysis has alerted the ship owners of US government interest...
3/This interest, along with a massive uptick in commercial market, will make ships much more expensive plus conversion costs.

Second, this follows what was done after 1991, when @DOTMARAD added ro/ros to their fleet. Ships built back then had longer service lives than today...
Read 14 tweets
3 Apr
Suez Canal Says it is Close to Clearing Ship Backlog – gCaptain

gcaptain.com/suez-canal-say…
Maersk Urges U.S. East Coast Ports to Use Suez Canal Delays to Clear Congestion – gCaptain

gcaptain.com/maersk-urges-u…
How Container Ships Got so Big, and Why They're Causing Problems

scl.io/wOUeF8e
Read 5 tweets
2 Apr
What is a Navy For?

Strategic purpose is not the same thing as operational necessities.

usni.org/magazines/proc…
"Mahan became a pioneering thinker about the importance of naval power in a globalized world economy, as well as of public opinion in shaping national strategic policy. His understanding came to center on the role of naval power in facilitating—or deranging—international trade."
:Contrary to popular opinion, Influence was not primarily about the employment of naval forces in wartime; rather, it was about the importance of state coordination of national maritime (including naval) resources to achieve relative advantage in both peace and war."
Read 9 tweets
1 Apr
First interview with new Federal Maritime Commission chairman

Nothing against Chairman Maffei, but I don't understand why we put pilots in charge of the FAA, but not a mariner in charge of the @FMC_gov

freightwaves.com/?p=329584 via @FreightWaves
MAFFEI: “We are in the midst of an unprecedented import boom, which is one of the ripple effects of COVID...The congestion that is occurring is unfortunately unavoidable with this kind of stress on the system."

So what are the solutions?
“We have seen hundreds and thousands of export containers that have been rejected for the last several months. This is not ideal. … We want to promote exports."

Yet, carriers are prioritizing empty containers over American exports.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(