There are so many biases in the way we discuss transport policy

I'll list a few of them in this 🧵

Most of these relate to rail (my own bias!) so far...

Do add more in @ - replies!
The shiny-new-tech bias

What Tim Dunn alludes to here. It looks shiny and cool, so people fall for it. In this case a regular tram would do better than this...

The I-used-it-and-it-was-fine bias

Pretty much everyone who's not French likes SNCF, as they've been on a TGV whizzing Paris to Marseille. Try getting a regional train between small towns and you will have a different view! Image
The [public transport mode of your choice]-is-too-costly bias

Sure, a train ticket has a nasty one off up-front price. But car drivers tend to forget the sunk costs of maintenance, insurance etc., and only recall how little they paid at the ⛽️ Image
The simple-use-case-in-mind bias

Hey, sure, I'd like to cross a city in a cable car! No congestion, no tunnels to bore like a metro...

Hang on. What about people with reduced mobility? Bicycles? Interchange with other modes? Noise? What if it's windy. Maybe less good... Image
The back-in-the-day bias

Especially common in railway policy, everyone dreams back to halcyon days... when trains actually looked like this Image
The it's-all-too-complex bias

Again especially common in railway policy, and especially in the EU, there is *always* a technical reason why something won't work, rather than solutions to make it work Image
The infrastructure-instead-of-operations bias

This is one politicians most often fall for - build a hugely expensive new high speed line or motorway, and then actually struggle to get anything running on it Image
The public-better-than-private (or private-better-than-public) bias

Loads of people discussing public transport policy fall into one of these camps. It can be that a combination works fine as well. And there are different variants of each Image
The they-do-it-better bias

Sure, learning from others has its advantage, but there are some examples that are not transferable - for reasons of politics, cost or geography. We can't (and wouldn't all want) to be the Swiss

/ends Image
Then there's the cheap-is-better-than-good bias

As seen in this tweet. Sure, I've thought the €1 TER thing was cool, but I've never bought a ticket at that rate because it's never gone where I need to go, when I need it. Cheaper always ≠ better

The generalising-the-exception bias is an important one too

Sure, not everyone can cycle. But if a lot more people did, it'd make lives of pedestrians, bus users etc. better *too*

I think I ought to add the people-like-me bias as well

I remember reading that 90% of regular passengers on German ICE trains *also* have a car. I don't. So my way of thinking about that service is atypical Image
Keep them coming folks!

The I-oppose-this-rail-infrastructure-because-I-support-something-else bias

This can often be a kind of nimbyism, or a lack of ambition - that scaling *everything* up might actually be the option

The this-technology-only-failed-because-we-didn’t-try-hard-enough bias

Applies to monorails, maglevs, hovercraft. There's a bit of the simple-use-case-in-mind bias in this too - think more widely and it's clear why maglev struggled

The because-it-isn't-perfect-it's-bad-bias (or the it-doesn't-benefit-me-bias)

You can't improve everything for everyone all of the time, so even if it's not perfect or doesn't benefit you, that doesn't mean it's bad

The [transport mode]-must-pay-its-own-way bias

Applies for example to car drivers complaining bikes don't pay road tax, while forgetting the negative impacts of driving



The as-the-crow-flies bias

Heard a lot in rail debate. Let's build a Berlin-Paris straight line! 4 hours trip... Errr, have you looked at the geography? That there are no other cities along that line?

The tech-optimising-existing-infrastructure bias

A belief that some as-yet-to-be-invented technology can solve real problems that actually need investment in hard infrastructure

The small-country-bias

A variant of the they-do-it-better bias, but what works in a country as small as Netherlands or Switzerland might well not be a model for France or Spain

The keep-the-slow-but-exceptional bias

Train ferries! Cool! Nice views of the Elbe between Dresden and Prague! Super! Sorry, but you're probably not typical. Most people want to get to their destination fast.

The it's-better-underground-than-overground bias

As applied to cities. Sure, building metro networks underground does sometimes make sense, but doing so when the aim is... to just let more people keep driving above ground? I'm less sure

The assume-unchanging-use-patterns bias

If a lot more people cycle to work, cycling-friendly clothing will also be more normal. Same could apply to how much parking space is planned for buildings

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Worth

Jon Worth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonworth

19 May
Worth reading @lisaocarroll report on Frost's Q&A with the Lords European Affairs Committee in full
theguardian.com/politics/2021/…

Quick 🧵

This paragraph is the crucial one 👇 Image
In other words he's trying to say "I am not an ideologue"

But in practice he is exactly that
Good policy making with regard to a UK-EU Veterinary Agreement, especially a Swiss style one, would weigh up the benefits and costs of such an agreement, and assess how swiftly it could be done...
Read 6 tweets
18 May
Today we have had two notable examples of enduring post-Brexit highly ideological fervour from parts of the UK Government

This is so wrong it's absurd

A 🧵
First there was the news that Liz Truss and some other Ministers want to push for a fast trade deal with Australia and New Zealand

Peter Foster sums it up in this thread:
Now just because you *can* sign a trade deal with Australia and New Zealand does not mean you should

And even if you should, doing it in haste might land you with a sub-optimal deal
Read 12 tweets
17 May
🤯
I have an invite to an *actual conference*

🤯🤯
It's in Belgrade! (OMG!)

🤯🤯🤯
How the *hell* do I get there from Berlin by train?
Start with @seatsixtyone Serbia page
seat61.com/Serbia.htm

This doesn't look good...

🇦🇹-🇸🇮 at Jesenice is closed, München-Zagreb 🛏🚅 not running

🇭🇺-🇷🇸 via Subotica still closed for rebuilding
Only way to reach Belgrade by train is the once a day Zagreb-Belgrade InterCity

@seatsixtyone says it departs at 1304 from Zagreb Gl. Kl - but *where is it*?

Not in Deutsche Bahn Reiseauskunft. Not in ÖBB Scotty.
Read 9 tweets
12 May
Ha ha! Isn't he a hypocrite! How dare he say the deal *he negotiated* is now unsustainable!

That's pretty much the universal reaction reaction from pro-🇪🇺 in 🇬🇧 to Frost's words about the NI Protocol

But personally I am done with all that. Enough.

A 🧵 as to what to do instead
Here is the news:
bbc.com/news/uk-northe…

And in some way Frost is right. The current situation *is* unsustainable
There are 2 reactions to that:

Ha ha Frost you idiot. You negotiated it! Eat a big dose of humble pie! (Just don't try to import it into NI)

Or actually work to make the Brexit Deal more sustainable
Read 12 tweets
10 May
I find reaction to this Jonathon Reed disqualified as candidate for Wiltshire & Swindon PCC thing so very strange

Here's the news of what happened:
bbc.com/news/uk-englan…
There's now a kind of briefing war going on between Reed and Tory HQ as to who knew what. @rupertevelyn from ITV has been following it all: itv.com/news/2021-05-0…

Tory HQ knew for *at least a week*
But that's not the strangest thing... the *reaction* is weird. Because this ought to be simple

There are two issues here, and you have to separate them

The rule is clear: Reed did not comply with the rules, cannot legitimately stand, and was disbarred. Done. Clear cut
Read 7 tweets
7 May
Twitter is full of wrong takes on Labour's Hartlepool loss

Was Labour too left/not left enough? 🤷‍♂️
Would Corbyn have done better than Starmer? 🤷‍♂️
Should Labour have been more/less pro-Brexit? 🤷‍♂️
Wrong candidate, chosen the wrong way? 🤷‍♂️

I don't care about any of them

Quick 🧵
Labour needs to start with the questions @rafaelbehr poses in this thought provoking column
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

And it needs to take account of the changes in voter behaviour documented by @robfordmancs in Brexitland
It also ought to look at what is happening elsewhere in Europe (sorry, but despite Brexit, what's happening in Britain reminds me of so much from European politics!)

It's like Labour is the SPD 🇩🇪 or PS 🇫🇷
And the Tories Fidesz 🇭🇺 or PiS 🇵🇱
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(