Pretty much everyone who's not French likes SNCF, as they've been on a TGV whizzing Paris to Marseille. Try getting a regional train between small towns and you will have a different view!
The [public transport mode of your choice]-is-too-costly bias
Sure, a train ticket has a nasty one off up-front price. But car drivers tend to forget the sunk costs of maintenance, insurance etc., and only recall how little they paid at the ⛽️
The simple-use-case-in-mind bias
Hey, sure, I'd like to cross a city in a cable car! No congestion, no tunnels to bore like a metro...
Hang on. What about people with reduced mobility? Bicycles? Interchange with other modes? Noise? What if it's windy. Maybe less good...
The back-in-the-day bias
Especially common in railway policy, everyone dreams back to halcyon days... when trains actually looked like this
The it's-all-too-complex bias
Again especially common in railway policy, and especially in the EU, there is *always* a technical reason why something won't work, rather than solutions to make it work
The infrastructure-instead-of-operations bias
This is one politicians most often fall for - build a hugely expensive new high speed line or motorway, and then actually struggle to get anything running on it
The public-better-than-private (or private-better-than-public) bias
Loads of people discussing public transport policy fall into one of these camps. It can be that a combination works fine as well. And there are different variants of each
The they-do-it-better bias
Sure, learning from others has its advantage, but there are some examples that are not transferable - for reasons of politics, cost or geography. We can't (and wouldn't all want) to be the Swiss
/ends
Then there's the cheap-is-better-than-good bias
As seen in this tweet. Sure, I've thought the €1 TER thing was cool, but I've never bought a ticket at that rate because it's never gone where I need to go, when I need it. Cheaper always ≠ better
I think I ought to add the people-like-me bias as well
I remember reading that 90% of regular passengers on German ICE trains *also* have a car. I don't. So my way of thinking about that service is atypical
Keep them coming folks!
The I-oppose-this-rail-infrastructure-because-I-support-something-else bias
This can often be a kind of nimbyism, or a lack of ambition - that scaling *everything* up might actually be the option
The this-technology-only-failed-because-we-didn’t-try-hard-enough bias
Applies to monorails, maglevs, hovercraft. There's a bit of the simple-use-case-in-mind bias in this too - think more widely and it's clear why maglev struggled
Heard a lot in rail debate. Let's build a Berlin-Paris straight line! 4 hours trip... Errr, have you looked at the geography? That there are no other cities along that line?
A variant of the they-do-it-better bias, but what works in a country as small as Netherlands or Switzerland might well not be a model for France or Spain
Train ferries! Cool! Nice views of the Elbe between Dresden and Prague! Super! Sorry, but you're probably not typical. Most people want to get to their destination fast.
As applied to cities. Sure, building metro networks underground does sometimes make sense, but doing so when the aim is... to just let more people keep driving above ground? I'm less sure
If a lot more people cycle to work, cycling-friendly clothing will also be more normal. Same could apply to how much parking space is planned for buildings
In other words he's trying to say "I am not an ideologue"
But in practice he is exactly that
Good policy making with regard to a UK-EU Veterinary Agreement, especially a Swiss style one, would weigh up the benefits and costs of such an agreement, and assess how swiftly it could be done...
There's now a kind of briefing war going on between Reed and Tory HQ as to who knew what. @rupertevelyn from ITV has been following it all: itv.com/news/2021-05-0…
Tory HQ knew for *at least a week*
But that's not the strangest thing... the *reaction* is weird. Because this ought to be simple
There are two issues here, and you have to separate them
The rule is clear: Reed did not comply with the rules, cannot legitimately stand, and was disbarred. Done. Clear cut
Twitter is full of wrong takes on Labour's Hartlepool loss
Was Labour too left/not left enough? 🤷♂️
Would Corbyn have done better than Starmer? 🤷♂️
Should Labour have been more/less pro-Brexit? 🤷♂️
Wrong candidate, chosen the wrong way? 🤷♂️
And it needs to take account of the changes in voter behaviour documented by @robfordmancs in Brexitland
It also ought to look at what is happening elsewhere in Europe (sorry, but despite Brexit, what's happening in Britain reminds me of so much from European politics!)
It's like Labour is the SPD 🇩🇪 or PS 🇫🇷
And the Tories Fidesz 🇭🇺 or PiS 🇵🇱