I find reaction to this Jonathon Reed disqualified as candidate for Wiltshire & Swindon PCC thing so very strange

Here's the news of what happened:
bbc.com/news/uk-englan…
There's now a kind of briefing war going on between Reed and Tory HQ as to who knew what. @rupertevelyn from ITV has been following it all: itv.com/news/2021-05-0…

Tory HQ knew for *at least a week*
But that's not the strangest thing... the *reaction* is weird. Because this ought to be simple

There are two issues here, and you have to separate them

The rule is clear: Reed did not comply with the rules, cannot legitimately stand, and was disbarred. Done. Clear cut
Whether the rule is *right* or *adequate* or too harsh or not harsh enough is fair enough to debate - but that is a separate issue

Sure, have that debate, but that will not, cannot, and should not save Reed
It was also... checks notes... the Tory-Lib Dem Government of David Cameron who introduced PCCs and set up the rules for them

For the Tory Party to then have a problem with said rules is some chutzpah
One of the supposed roles of political parties in mature democracies is to be able to do this sort of candidate vetting. It's perhaps symptomatic of how British party politics has fallen that the Tories are incapable even of this
But to conclude, the outcome here is as clear as the light of day: Reed broke the rules, is disbarred. That's done.

/ends

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Worth

Jon Worth Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonworth

7 May
Twitter is full of wrong takes on Labour's Hartlepool loss

Was Labour too left/not left enough? 🤷‍♂️
Would Corbyn have done better than Starmer? 🤷‍♂️
Should Labour have been more/less pro-Brexit? 🤷‍♂️
Wrong candidate, chosen the wrong way? 🤷‍♂️

I don't care about any of them

Quick 🧵
Labour needs to start with the questions @rafaelbehr poses in this thought provoking column
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

And it needs to take account of the changes in voter behaviour documented by @robfordmancs in Brexitland
It also ought to look at what is happening elsewhere in Europe (sorry, but despite Brexit, what's happening in Britain reminds me of so much from European politics!)

It's like Labour is the SPD 🇩🇪 or PS 🇫🇷
And the Tories Fidesz 🇭🇺 or PiS 🇵🇱
Read 13 tweets
29 Apr
Let's try a little counterfactual thread

The critique from plenty of people in 🇪🇺 and 🇬🇧 has been 🇪🇺 got its vaccines strategy *wrong*

So if it were wrong, what should it have done better?
First BioNTech/Pfizer orders and approval

🇬🇧 approved 3 weeks before 🇪🇺, and received a solid early order (shipped from Puurs 🇧🇪)

🇬🇧 signed contract with Pfizer/BioNTech 4 months before 🇪🇺, but EIB and 🇩🇪 provided funding, 🇬🇧 govt did not
BioNTech has also stated that more public funding would have not helped it scale up faster

Also looking forward, with Marburg 🇩🇪, Frankfurt 🇩🇪 due on stream in a couple of months, and lipids from Hanau 🇩🇪 (Evonik) to complete the 🇪🇺-based supply chain, this looks solid now
Read 16 tweets
28 Apr
This 🧵 is a summary of my article for @metropole_vie about 💉 supply in 🇪🇺

You can read the whole piece here:
metropole.at/eu-covid-vacci…

tl;dr: the worst of 🇪🇺's supply woes are behind it now...

1/11
22-29 January was really the low point

22 Jan: AZ scaled back its delivery forecast to the EU for Q1 from 100m to 31m

29 Jan: von der Leyen caused all the controversy by including reference to Art 16 NI Protocol in the transparency mechanism

2/11
But that transparency mechanism was when it all began to turn. For it allowed the EU to explain what vaccines were going where - and also highlight how much of UK's early vaccine success was based on exports from the EU

3/11
Read 11 tweets
26 Apr
Something really does not add up with the Johnson & Johnson 💉 supply numbers EU-US

But where is the error?

A 🧵 to get to the bottom of it - comments and stats in the replies very welcome!
Here are the CDC's numbers for the USA

8m doses administered
17.6m doses delivered (so 9.6m delivered and not administered)

Source: covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tra… Image
On 28 February this NY Times piece by @SharonLNYT:
"The initial 3.9 million [J&J] doses were manufactured at its factory in the Netherlands; officials have said the rest of the doses were expected to come from its Baltimore plant." (that's Emergent)

nytimes.com/2021/02/28/wor…
Read 13 tweets
26 Apr
Agggghhh

@jwildeboer sent me this Spiegel 💉 story by @ClausHecking, abut J&J delivery problems in Germany

I will translate and take this one apart piece by piece

spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unt…
"Benachteiligt der Konzern die EU?"

"Is the company disadvantaging the EU?"

No, as we will see
"»Die zweite Lieferung wird nicht den ursprünglich prognostizierten Umfang haben«, schreibt das Bundesgesundheitsministerium"

"The second delivery will not have the originally forecast volume," writes the Federal Ministry of Health

That's correct. But let's get to *why*
Read 17 tweets
26 Apr
So now the European Commission *is* taking AstraZeneca to court, I presume all the EU-sceptics who said the Commission will never dare will eat their words?

People like this:
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(