1/ From the run up from $17K - $60K, addresses with more than 10K $BTC have been falling.
From January to April when $BTC almost doubled in price, there was a roughly 10% reduction in mega whales.
Because the number is so low and may contain exchange addresses it's a bit fuzzy.
2/ Addresses with >1K $BTC ($40M currently) is likely more representative of "whale"/ long term believers.
This was a sharper bunch and basically started selling around $38K, all the way to the top.
3/ So if whales were cashing out, who was buying $BTC to sustain it from $50K - $60K?
As always, probably the retails, defined as addresses with >0.1 $BTC, kept buying even as price continued to move up, and consolidate under resistance.
4/ Now let's look at $ETH whales (>10K ETH addresses).
Here 10K is at market value only $26M, so it's somewhat comparable to the >1K BTC whales (more so than the 10K BTC mega whales).
Here, $ETH whales are actually accumulating into yesterday's dip, reaching almost ATH!
5/ Perhaps somewhat surprisingly, addresses with >1K ETH, are falling.
Since >1K includes >10K, it means ~10% of the addresses with between 1K - 10K ETH (2.6 - 26M) have been cashing out (and missing the recent rally).
6/ Anecdotally, I know a lot of DeFi users who cashed out last month to stables, felt horrible about missing the entire ETH run in May...
And now are buying back and basically in the same spot as their counterparts who hodl through
Two paths, same outcome
7/ However, even though whales cashing out of $BTC may sound bearish, whales often seem to sell **way** too prematurely.
In the last cycle, if you sold as 1K $BTC addresses started to fall, you miss a 30x in $BTC's run from $600....to $20K!
8/ One can argue that the last cycle was primarily driven by retail mania, so whale activity was less relevant - and that large accounts like institutions dominate the market more this cycle.
But that'd be wrong too...
9/ The supply of $BTC held by addresses with 10k-100k has actually fallen drastically from last cycle vs. this cycle.
Compare this with the 0.1-1 $BTC small fish address. It's only going one way as $BTC finds its way to more and more hodlers.
10/ So what can we glean from the above?
- Over time, there are more holders for $BTC & $ETH
- Whales are buying the $ETH dip hard!
- Whales can control price movement in short term, but long term the masses matter more
- Mega whales often sell waaay too early
ps/ Yes I realized I used "addresses" to refer to UTXO but I'm too lazy to correct it and noobs won't care about the difference in parlance
ps2/ As an aside - I think $ETH needs some time to settle after a massive run up, and panicky crypto investors likely default back to $BTC for lower vol and “safe have” in the immediate short term.
No strong conviction either way, 50:50 $BTC $ETH for now
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Risk appetite for young full time traders/investors in crypto
1/ I remember reading about a prominent tradfi HF who would give greener analysts more discretion in sizing, since they had no fear vs. grizzled PMs
Fearlessness came from not having lived through extended bear markets and not almost losing your job.
2/ In crypto, I used to think the insane risk appetite investors in their 20s have is because greener investors don’t have the experience of handling big crashes (eg 90s tech bust, 08 crisis).
But crypto had 4 cycles already, with more -60%+ mini cycles for specific sectors!
1/ @compoundfinance is the only lending protocol discussed without immediate plans for token fee capture, which leaves room for a value unlock event.
$COMP is underpricing its annualized interest by a factor of 10x relative to $AAVE!
2/ Sure, @compoundfinance is the only protocol with liquidity mining, so volumes are incentivized.
But...
Even if we assume 90% of the volumes will go poof without LM (aggressive assumption), it is still cheaper than its main competitor on a per dollar volume basis.