Today is Janaki Navami. Jay Maa Janaki.
Short thread to say why dont trUST fools by denying Agni Pariksha. This is an Insult to the immense love of Shri Rama and you'll soon know why.
Rama says त्वानुजाने which is a pun, it means I allow you to enter and I also know the Reality. This also means that Rama never asked her to enter fire. Sita herself orders Lakshmana, Lakshmana is struck. He looks at Rama, Rama nods and by getting asked by both, he gets wood. +
In a real world, this serves as a great message. See how feminists trap men and ruin their life/career and men also pollute women and ruin chaste women's lives. But only their closed ppl know the truth, once you are defamed or even a simple accusation is put up, the world who +
doesn't know you can easily make an assumption of yours. Esp if you're famous, one #meetoo tweet and ur gone. Then you have to prove your innocence to the world. Even if you live in a Dharmik society who doesn't judge immideately, ppl will see you with suspicion if u dont +
come up with proper proofs and clarifications. How is the world supposed to know? So proving your innocence is your job entirely. Feminists try to twist this into a male-female issue that women are always judged and need to prove innocence? But is that true? No. +
Rama is known by the three worlds An accusation so deep on Maa Sita cannot be tolerated. Rama never doubted Sita i clarified in the first tweet. It is Rama's immense love that he could tolerate ppl question him but not Maa Sita. All closed ones Hanuman etc dont need any clarific+
ation, its this society which would always doubt or see with suspicion. Yes, even if it is Sita ji. Rama says that the one who doesn't put his efforts in Removal of Disfamy derserves Naraka. Removal of Sita's Disfamy is Rama's duty now. Result? Today we take Maa Sita's name +
as an eg of the most dedicated and chaste Women, and all other generations follow her footsteps to dedication and subservience to their husbands& Bhagavan Hari. Agni Pariksha can also he metaphorical (real meaning is also true) that we all need to go thru AP in removal of disfamy
So dont question AP and undermine efforts of ShriRama. Jaya SiyaRama.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with कौण्ड भट्ट

कौण्ड भट्ट Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kaundabhatta

16 May
I will share a very unpopular and blunt opinion, not opinion but fact today. Something by which I may get cancelled by Dimwits. But I will say read entire 1st. Puri Shankaracharya isn't Finat Authority on Dharma, not Puri Shankaracharya, Any Shankaracharya. Or Vaishnavacharya. +
I saw a video of Puri Shankaracharya declaring post of Shankaracharya as Sarvabhauma Acharya, and few Advaitis also in my fb feed have expressed opposition to such a narrative. A person may have utmost Gurubhakti, but disagreement from Guru on basis of Shastras is justified, +
Ramanuja disagreed from his Guru, Shankara from his Guru. Such instances are alot. The basic thing most Political Hindus dont understand that the disagreement isn't on emotional/personal/politcial/social basis but only on Shastra-level. Such disagreement is healthy & i would also
Read 26 tweets
11 May
Why do we need Shaastras? Are Shaastras Scientific?
Ans = We dont need Shaastras for stuff that is scientific. If it can be percieved or understood through reasoning, rationalization and physical methods, how will Shaastras tell us something unique we couldn't know otherwise? +
Imagine a horse standing in front, i say to a friend besides me 'look a horse', he replies back 'duh, i can see it'. There's really nothing new abt that restatement, the Vedas etc don't restate stuff we already know/can know by physical proofs. It would be useless if they did. +
What is Stuff we cannot understand without shaastras? Dharma = Yajnas Vyavahara Shuddhi Ashuddhi etc, there is no source to know why should a man do Jyotishtoma Yajna for heaven. There is no source why Cow is pure. Only shaastras tell us this. Perceiving Morality through reason +
Read 21 tweets
22 Apr
The biggest contribution of Bharatiya Vaidika Arya Hindu Culture to the entire world in terms of Upasana is the Tantrika concept of 'Devo bhootva devam yajet', which has inspired Sufis Christianity etc. The concept is present in code form in the Vedas but expanded thru Tantras. +
Modern historians and indologists includi hindu ones like to attribute diff type of evolution in the shaastras, some of it is true, sm of it is enforced. Before understanding this uniqje and revolutionary concept, rmv d mindset that Yoga Upasana etc came into Vedas thru Tantra.
Also ppl lIke Winternitz confined the word Tantra only to the Shalta school, which also is a huge blunder and the modern understanding of this word has become limited to magicstuff. Which also isn't true. So by tantra i mean the Aagamas, vaishnava shaiva shakta Saura skaanda etc.
Read 21 tweets
14 Apr
On the anniv of Bra, let us take in mind few flaws and unethical means he used to spew hate against hindus. He was against Caste, but never chose Atheism like Savarkar, chose a religion equally casteist sharing so many parallels to Hinduism. +
Myth= buddhism believes in equality. No. Buddhism Jainism Hinduism all 3 believe in Samsara, samsara means birth is based on prior karma and karma is due to birth, such circle keeps continuing and this cycle has no beginning. Buddhism cannot exist without Pratitya-samutpada +
Which promotes prior birth's karma determines the type of birth one has. Aatma goes through several births before getting human birth, if he gets human birth he becomes subject to Karma. Animals etc cajt do karma, they only bear the consequences of karma they did in human life. +
Read 15 tweets
10 Apr
Entire Sadhguru Blasphemous Links compiled.
1.
Proudly Admits he never read Gita Upanishads Vedas not even Yogasutras.

2.
Says he read no scripture but authoritatively speaking on scriptures,
says there is no concept of 1 God here only multiple divine entities. Calls those entities as "tools". Says Gods are our making. No 1 God who controls everything. Reality is Rigved calls him 1, who is called by names Shiva Indra Brahma etc.
3. Compares rama to jesus

(Weather they exist or not, we dont know, we are not a historian. you just need an icon. Krishna did not exist, Jesus did not exist what does it matter to you). Rama is a man we should learn from, and so was Jesus. So Ram=Yeshu.
Read 25 tweets
5 Apr
This fool is justifying what Jaggi said. He has quoted Brahmavaivarta, I will also show what is given there. No.1 Nobody has said love of Gopis had any form of lust, but there is difference of Shringaar Ras and Vaatsalya Raa, there is nowhere Yashoda has shown desire to be lover
lover of Krishna, Gopis loved Krishna as Husband, Lover, wajted to have Romance with him, there is no lust in Romance. But Yashodaji's love was always of a Mother, she saw Krishna as a child, and Jaggi has alleged many things in 1 video which I will list now +.
1. Krishna never returned
2. Yashoda's love "transformed" from mother to "lover" (in romantic sense)
3. Yashoda was jealous of Radha as she started viewing her as Rival in the supposed "Romantic Love" she "developed". All this nonsense will be countered now.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(