One of our founders called me up today & asked me what he should do about a situation. It took him a while to raise and all of a sudden today everyone wanted in.
He asked me if he could bump up the valuation cap.
Read on >>
1) He had told all the investors he was mtg w that his cap was $x.
But now he was oversubscribed and didn’t want the extra dilution. So he wanted to move it up.
2) I told him that was shortsighted. And that even if he hadn’t signed w these ppl yet, he should honor his word - that they could come in at $x - what he told them.
3) I told him he could pare ppl down but that he shouldn’t change the terms. Because that’s not a good experience and trust starts at 100% and only goes down.
4) I told him that one way he could try to finagle a higher valuation is to pare ppl down and then say you can’t take more capital than $Y at that cap per dilution considerations but would be open to doing additional capital at a higher cap.
5) In addition he could also use the oversubscription situation to force everyone to move faster. Ie tell all potential investors you are oversubscribed but would honor the valuation as long as ppl could sign and wire by Z date.
6) But whatever it was - he could NOT change the valuation for the tranche he was raising. Even though nothing was signed.
Because your word in business needs to mean something.
7) In addition, investors talk. A LOT. I’ve seen investors not touch a deal because a founder screwed over 1 investor.
It’s just not worth it to do business with ppl who aren’t able to follow through on what they say. Even if they become a unicorn.
8) I think most of the time when I run into these situations - either w my portfolio founders talking to other investors or potential portfolio founders who have done this to me, I chuck it off to ppl being naive and not communicating well.
9) But it sure feels like mal-intent as a user experience.
So to avoid these issues, clear communication is impt. How much are you raising on this tranche? At what cap?
What are the caveats? Ie you’re talking w a lot of ppl today who could fill it by tmrw.
Clear communication matters.
Think about the other person you’re considering working with. What user experience are you creating?
Because trust starts at 100% and only goes down.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today's tweet thread is on playing long term games in business and what that means.
Read on >>
1) Yesterday I tweeted this -- it was deliberately vague.
From the perspective of building relationships with ppl, I often see ppl in startup ecosystems playing short term games, when really they are just shooting themselves in the foot:
An entrepreneur-friend of mine referred a company to me that I thought sounded interesting. But I also commented that the sales cycle seemed long but we'll see.
Today's thread - what makes a sales cycle long? Why is it relevant to VCs? How do you even know??
Read on >>
1) First, let's take a step back.
I've often talked about how the VC asset class isn't about investing in good businesses. It's about finding the highest possible multiple-returning companies.
This was a total mind warp to me in going from entrepreneur to VC.
2) As an aside, angels have completely different incentives. As stewards of their own money, angels can invest for whatever reason.
VCs, though, manage other ppl's money, and those ppl invest solely BECAUSE they want the highest returning outcomes possible.
Today @jefielding@MacConwell and I talked about term sheets and how to negotiate them. What to look for? How to negotiate?
Here are some key takeaways from that conversation
Read on >>
1) First, what is a term sheet (in this context)?
It's a summary of terms for an offer to invest that an investor will give you ahead of much longer legal docs.
2) It'll include things like:
-how much the investor will invest
-at what valuation
-min threshold that needs to be met (if any)
-any Board Seats that the investor will get
-employee option pool that needs to be created
-liquidation preferences
-etc
If you're thinking about it, I don't think it hurts to go through the process of applying - it will help you think through your business.
2) Although every program is different, accelerator interviews are often quite different from VC interviews.
You need to be able to answer qs about your business comprehensively but also concisely. Your interviewers will also make a decision way faster than most VCs.
Today's tweetstorm is about accelerators. Should you do one? Which one? Is it worth the equity? How should you make the most of your time with one?
I speak from having gone through and also having managed a top accelerator.
Read >>
1) Like everything else, accelerators are "worthwhile" depending on what your goal is and whether the program you're in can help you achieve that goal.
It's very impt for you to do your own homework on whether this is true because not all accelerators are the same.
2) Most accelerators in the US these days take 5-8% equity for $100k-$150k.
Abroad, the equity stakes can be higher or the dollar amounts invested in your company are lower.