1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the basics of Tax Deferred Compounding.

This will show you a few simple ways to factor taxes into your decision making -- so you can better optimize your *after tax* investment returns.
2/

In his 1989 letter to Berkshire shareholders, Warren Buffett shared a very insightful calculation:
3/

This calculation highlights a key fact:

When our portfolio turnover is high, our *after tax* results can be much worse than our *pre-tax* results.

It's because: every time we sell a stock (at a profit) to buy another, we incur a tax charge. Over time, these charges add up.
4/

Let's work through the math in Buffett's example.

The example has 2 scenarios: A and B.

In A, we start with $1.

We invest this $1 into a stock -- say, S1.

We hold S1 for 1 year. In this time, S1 doubles.

So, our investment becomes worth $2.
5/

We now sell S1 for $2.

But all of this $2 is not ours to keep.

We have to pay a 34% tax on the $1 of capital gains we realized. That's $0.34.

After paying the $0.34 tax, we're left with $2 - $0.34 = $1.66.

We now invest this $1.66 into a second stock, S2.
6/

We hold S2 for 1 year. In this time, S2 doubles.

We again sell, and again pay the 34% tax.

And so on -- for 20 years.

Here's a quick picture:
7/

The question is: how much money will we have at the end of Year 20?

Well, suppose we start a particular year with $X.

During this year, our stock will double to $2X. We'll pay $0.34X in taxes on capital gains of $X.

So, we'll end the year with $2X - $0.34X = $1.66X.
8/

So, each year, we start with $X and end with $1.66X.

Year 1: start with $1, end with $1.66
Year 2: start with $1.66, end with $1.66^2
Year 3: start with $1.66^2, end with $1.66^3
...
Year 20: start with $1.66^19, end with $1.66^20.

That's the pattern.
9/

So, we end Year 20 with $1.66^20 = ~$25244, exactly as Buffett said.

Thus, in scenario A, we hold 20 stocks for 1 year each.

And in the process, we turn our $1 into ~$25K.
10/

Scenario B is much simpler: we hold *1* stock for *20* years.

And that stock -- let's call it SB -- doubles each year, just like our Scenario A stocks.

But we don't sell SB until the end of Year 20.

So, we *defer* paying capital gains taxes until the very end.
11/

So, how much money do we end up with in Scenario B?

Here's the pattern:

Year 1: start with $1, end with $2
Year 2: start with $2, end with $4
Year 3: start with $4, end with $8
...
Year 20: start with $2^19, end with $2^20.
12/

So, when we finally sell SB at the end of Year 20, we'll get $2^20 = $1,048,576.

As with Scenario A, we pay a 34% tax on our capital gains of $1,048,575. That's a $356,515.50 tax bill.

After the tax, we'll be left with $1,048,576 - $356,515.50 = $692,060.50.
13/

So, here's the summary:

Scenario A. Hold 20 stocks for 1 year each. *Pay* tax each year. Turn $1 into ~$25K.

Scenario B. Hold 1 stock for 20 years. *Defer* tax until the end. Turn $1 into ~$692K.

That's the power of *deferring* taxes.

That's what Buffett was driving at.
14/

But of course, this is an exaggerated example.

Ordinary investors don't double their money (even pre-tax) every year.

So, let's make it more realistic.

We'll start with $100K in both scenarios, score a 10% pre-tax return each year, and pay capital gains tax at a 25% rate.
15/

Using similar reasoning, here's what we'll end up with at the end of Year 20.

Scenario A. Hold 20 stocks for 1 year each. *Pay* tax each year. Turn $100K into ~$425K.

Scenario B. Hold 1 stock for 20 years. *Defer* tax until the end. Turn $100K into ~$530K.

Calculations:
16/

So, even with more realistic numbers, there's a material difference between *paying* the tax each year and *deferring* it until the end.

In this case, *deferring* nets us about $105K -- or ~25% -- more money than *paying*.

That's serious money for most of us.
17/

*Deferred* taxes are like "float" -- an interest free loan from the government that we've invested in a particular stock.

We share the benefits of this investment with the government.

And we don't have to pay the government until we sell the stock.

As Buffett puts it:
18/

The longer we hold the stock, the longer we get to defer our taxes -- and the more we benefit from this "float".

Over 20 years, as we saw, this benefit can add up to hundreds of thousands of dollars!

This is partly why Buffett's favorite holding period is forever.
19/

But of course, we shouldn't hold on to a stock just because selling it would trigger a tax.

That would be letting the tax tail wag the investment dog.

Long holding periods work great -- but only for wonderful businesses. "Cigar butts", for example, don't meet this test.
20/

Also, it's a good idea to remember that *passive* investment strategies -- which tend to have lower portfolio turnover -- tend to benefit more from Tax Deferred Compounding than *active* investment strategies.
21/

For example, let's imagine 2 investors: Pam and Aaron.

Pam is a passive investor. Every year, she saves $50K and puts it into a low-cost S&P 500 index fund.

The fund returns 7% per year (tax deferred), plus 2% in dividends (tax paid at 25%, and the rest reinvested).
22/

If Pam continues her passive investing style for 30 years, and then finally pays her deferred taxes, she will be left with $5.24M:
23/

Aaron, on the other hand, is an active investor.

He also saves $50K per year. But he picks individual stocks. He holds these stocks for a year before selling them, paying taxes, and reinvesting the rest into the next batch of stocks.
24/

Not surprisingly, Aaron doesn't benefit from Tax Deferred Compounding to the same extent that Pam does.

So, if Aaron gets the same "7% pre-tax appreciation plus 2% dividends", he will end up under-performing Pam:
25/

To get the *same* result as Pam, Aaron has to generate an *excess* annual return of about 1.1% (ie, 8.1% pre-tax appreciation + 2% dividends).

This excess return is a kind of "phantom" alpha. It may boost Aaron's pre-tax results, but it vanishes post-tax.
26/

Thus, active investors with shorter holding periods are at a fundamental disadvantage.

Because they don't benefit as much from deferred taxes, they have to generate *excess* pre-tax returns simply to level with their passive counterparts' post-tax results.
27/

If you're still with me, thank you very much!

Taxes are a fundamental consideration in investing. I hope the calculations in this thread convinced you of the power of deferring taxes while compounding money.

Please stay safe. Enjoy your weekend!

/End

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

20 May
1/

Reductio Ad Absurdum, or Proof By Contradiction, is a powerful mathematical technique.

It embodies the spirit of Charlie Munger's favorite mantra -- Invert, Always Invert!

Here's G. H. Hardy, a renowned British mathematician, comparing the technique to a chess gambit:
2/

Reductio Ad Absurdum works like this:

We want to prove a statement S.

We start by assuming that S is *false*. We then show that this leads to an absurd conclusion -- like 1 = 2.

So, S can't possibly be false.

It has to be true!

And that's the proof.
3/

Here are 2 examples of Reductio Ad Absurdum from G. H. Hardy's book, A Mathematician's apology:

a) Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many prime numbers, and

b) Pythogoras's proof that the square root of 2 is irrational (ie, not the ratio of 2 integers).
Read 4 tweets
15 May
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through 2 probability concepts: Standard Deviation (SD) and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD).

This will give you insight into Fat Tails -- which are super useful in investing and in many other fields.
2/

Recently, I watched 2 probability "mini-lectures" on YouTube by Nassim Taleb.

One ~10 min lecture covered SD and MAD. The other ~6 min lecture covered Fat Tails.

In these ~16 mins, @nntaleb shared so many useful nuggets that I had to write this thread to unpack them.
3/

For those curious, here are the YouTube links to the lectures:

SD and MAD (~10 min):

Fat Tails (~6 min):
Read 31 tweets
8 May
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the basics of Decision Fatigue.

Understanding this can help us improve the quality of our "high value" decisions, while reducing the number of "low value" decisions we need to make.
2/

Every day, from the minute we wake up, we have a number of decisions to make.

Some are "low value" decisions. A few months or a year from now, we probably won't care much about them or even remember them.

For example, do we wear the red shirt or the blue shirt today?
3/

And some are "high value" decisions.

A year or more from now, they're likely to still be impacting us.

For example, do we get an Apple or an Android device? Do we invest this month's savings into Stock A or Stock B?
Read 31 tweets
24 Apr
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the basics of retirement planning.
2/

Most of us go through life without ever experiencing a "windfall".

We don't start billion dollar companies.

Or win lotteries.

Or become highly paid sportsmen or movie stars.

Heck, most of us never even have a tweet go viral.
3/

For "ordinary" folks like us, the most promising path to a comfortable retirement boils down to 3 things:

a) Planning ahead and starting early,

b) Living consistently below our means (ie, saving diligently), and

c) Investing our savings intelligently over many years.
Read 30 tweets
17 Apr
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll help you understand Markov Chains.

In life, and in investing, we often come across situations where luck/chance plays a major role.

And Markov Chains are often a great way to model and analyze such situations.
2/

Here's what prompted me to write this thread.

Earlier this week, I conducted a Twitter poll.

In the poll, I posed a question that required a bit of probabilistic reasoning.

The good news: over 10,000 people responded.

The bad news: ~87% got the answer wrong!
3/

Here's the question I asked.

Imagine we have 2 volunteers: Alice and Bob.

We give them each a fair coin.

We ask Alice to keep tossing her coin until she sees a Heads immediately followed by a Tails (ie, the pattern HT).
Read 32 tweets
10 Apr
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the basics of leverage -- in our personal lives and in the companies we invest in.
2/

Imagine we have an idea for a business.

To start the business, we need to put in $1M.

In return, the business will generate $250K for us every year -- for 10 years.

So, our upfront investment is $1M. But over the next 10 years, we get to take out $250K * 10 = $2.5M.
3/

This is an "unleveraged" annual return (IRR) of about 21.4%.

"Unleveraged" means we don't borrow any money.

That is, we use our own money for the initial $1M investment.

For more on IRRs and how to calculate them:
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(