I told you Frank Luntz’s focus groups are a scam, nothing but manipulation to push the views of his clients by passing them off as legitimate research.
But I thank the @DailyMail for confirming that via a former employe, for me.
P.S. As it stands now, poorly conducted media polls with a D+6 projection still can’t put @GovRonDeSantis behind. So, I’m not entirely sure where this willingness to fall on a rusty sword is coming from.
I’ll amend this statement when it is necessary. But for now, let me make this as clear as possible...
As the only person to poll Florida correctly since 2014, @GovRonDeSantis is NOT beatable. This is a fools errand. His support is not partisan by ID, age, race, etc.
Of all the invites we've sent out over the years to welcome outside review of our work, @PetrSvab of @EpochTimes is the only one who ever took us up on that offer.
The rest either smeared or were quiet in the face of the smear.
Speaking of smears, look at the trend on Twitter right now re: the Arizona audit, citing "some experts" who're "raising questions".
Bunk.
@kelliwardaz and @AZGOP invited everyone and anyone to participate in this audit. They refused B/C they wanted to have an excuse after it.
Funny how many of those classified as "experts" reversed themselves after years — even decades — of research on the impact of mail-in-voting re: fraud and turnout.
Simply have no principled positions. Might as well hang "For Sale" signs around their necks.
As jurors speak out, what @barnes_law and I told you repeatedly will become increasingly clear.
Juror responses in voir dire were red flags for defense. They didn't "deliberate" over the facts. They projected their experiences/beliefs onto the case. foxnews.com/us/chauvin-jur…
To be fair to them, they are far from being alone in doing this. That's how most jurors/juries come to render verdicts.
They tell themselves a story through the lense of their own beliefs.
It was just particularly slanted (very) in the trial against Derek Chauvin.
"It was just dark. It felt like every day was a funeral and watching someone die every day."
He wanted on "because of all the protests and everything that happened after the event. This is the most historic case of my lifetime, and I would love to be a part of it."
Wait, I’ve been told that I have “greatly exaggerated” the failures of this industry.
Lol.
Here’s an idea to reach a “consensus” on what went wrong. Ask someone who didn’t screw it up — again — then shut up, and listen to them. politico.com/news/2021/04/1…
I feel as if we've been down this road before.
Pollsters screw up, majorly, refuse to listen to those who did not, smear them instead, put on cute conventions exclusively with the screw ups, listen to them about why they screwed up, then screw up again.
Rinse. Repeat cycle.
The industry should take grandma’s advice: if you want to be better at something or a better person, then surround yourself with people better than you, and learn from them.
Screw ups can’t tell other screw ups how not to screw up. Losers can’t tell other losers how to win.
If the @PressSec and the Biden Admin think conservatives are their major hurdle with the vaccine, they they have a real problem. We found a clear disparity between black, Hispanic and other minorities vs. whites, and they are more suspicious of it.
Point being, the percentage of whites who told us they are a hard No on getting the vaccine basically mirrors the national average. Other minority groups saying they are not getting it exceeded the average and won’t be reached by PSA spots during NASCAR, @PressSec.
Here are Covid-19 vaccinations by race:
"I have no plans to get vaccinated": 24.6%
"I intend to get vaccinated": 32.1%
"I have already been vaccinated": 43.3%
@PressSec@jrpsaki, can you reach Black/AA, American Indian/Alaska Native, Indian/Other Asian groups via Nascar PSAs?