THREAD: The Book of Judges & its Anti-Feasts

SUBTITLE: A Liturgy of Violence
The book of Judges is a book of deliverance.

That might make it sound like a fairly upbeat story.

Sadly, however, it’s anything but.

As the book unfolds, its acts of deliverance become progressively more bloody and paradoxical, as do its deliverers,...
...until, in the book’s awful finale, deliverance doesn’t come at all.

A helpless woman is delivered over to her enemies.

These acts of deliverance—or, in the last case, non-deliverance—are portrayed as inversions/antitheses of Israel’s major feasts.
=== GIDEON’S ANTI-SUKKOT ===

Things start to go wrong pretty early on in the book.

Like Saul, Gideon begins his career with impressive humility (cp. 6.15 w. 1 Sam. 9.21).

But before too long—and again like Saul—, Gideon turns brutal.
His brutality is framed against the backdrop of the feast of Tabernacles.
Under normal circumstances, the feast of Tabernacles (aka ‘Sukkot’ = ‘booths’) is celebrated on the 15th of Tishri, towards the end of the grape harvest.

The Israelites head to the hills, from where they gather fruits and branches,...
... and afterwards they return to their houses, build booths (often on their roofs), and sleep under the starry sky (cp. Lev. 23.40–43, Deut. 16.13, Neh. 8.14–18).

In Gideon’s case, however, the feast is reinvented, and not for the better.
As his judgeship begins to degenerate into a quest for vengeance (cp. 8.19), Gideon has two kings beheaded in a ‘winepress’ and refers to his slaughter of the Midianites as ‘a grape harvest’ (8.2).
And, as the 15th ‘day’ begins to dawn in the book of Judges—i.e., just before the word day occurs for the 15th time—, Gideon visits the town of ‘Sukkot’ (8.5, 8.28).

Rather than fetch branches from the hillside, Gideon fetches briars from the wilderness...
... and flays the elders of Succoth with them (8.16).

Gideon thus behaves in a brutal manner, which leaves a permanent impression on Israel.

Indeed, in Judges 9, Gideon’s son (Abimelech) continues the violence his father has begun, which has similarly Sukkot-like overtones.
Just as seventy bulls are sacrificed at the feast of Tabernacles (i.e., 13 + 12 + 11 + 10 + 9 + 8 + 7: cp. Num. 29.12–34), so Abimelech sacrifices Gideon’s seventy sons (on a single stone) and proclaims himself claim king of Shechem.
And, just as the feast of Tabernacles is set against the backdrop of the olive, fig, and vine trees’ produce, so too is Abimelech’s reign (courtesy of Jotham’s parable) (Deut. 11.14, 15.12–14 w. 1–11, 16.13).
Once Abimelech (the thorn-king) has officially been ‘enthroned’ in Shechem, things get even worse.

The time of the grape harvest soon comes round, at which point a festival is in progress;
and, right on cue, the festival turns sour (9.27ff.), which is accompanied by a sequence of Sukkot-related images in reverse order.

Abimelech launches an attack against the men of Shechem. (He’s spent the previous night under the
starry sky.)
The men of Shechem flee for safety to the roof of a nearby tower (9.46).

And, in response, Abimelech and his men head to the hills to fetch brushwood (soko, which sounds a lot like sukkot), which they pile up next to the men of Shechem’s tower (9.48–49).
Suffice it to say, their desire isn’t to build a booth;

it’s to roast the men of Shechem alive, which they soon achieve.

The text of ch. 9 thus moves through the events of Sukkot in reverse order, which it does to reflect an inversion/perversion of their original intent.
The fertility and greenery of Canaan is turned to violent ends;

the Israelites look to establish a kingship rather than to remember their sojourn;

and blood flows rather than wine.
=== JEPHTHAH’S ANTI-PASSOVER ===

The book of Judge’s next flawed deliverer is Jephthah.

As the Ammonites close in on Gilead, the Gileadites decide they need an experienced warrior to bail them out of trouble.

They thus hire Jephthah.
And, initially, their decision bears fruit.

Jephthah accomplishes a distcintly Passover-like deliverance.

Just as the angel of death passes through (עבר) the land of Egypt and smites the land and its gods, so Jephthah ‘passes through Gilead’ (עבר) into Ammon (עבר again),...
... where he smites the Ammonites and their god (cp. 11.21–25, 32 w. Exod. 12.12ff.).

And, just as Moses’s sister comes to meet him with ‘timbrels and dances’ in the aftermath of Egypt’s defeat, so too, in the aftermath of Ammon’s, Jephthah’s daughter comes to meet him.
Jephthah’s judgeship thus gets off to an extraordinary start.

Yet, even as Jephthah’s daughter comes to celebrate Israel’s victory, Jephthah’s Passover deliverance starts to devolve into an anti-Passover.

Jephthah has made a foolish vow.
And, whereas YHWH’s fulfilment of his Passover vow results in the salvation of his firstborn (Israel), whom he brings up (להעלות) out of Egypt (Exod. 3.17, 6.8, etc.), Jephthah’s results in the death of his firstborn,...
...whom he’s forced to sacrifice (להעלות) on the altar of his folly.

Other anti-Passover traits aren’t hard to identify.
While Israel arrives at Mount Sinai two months after the Passover, where she enters into a covenant with her God (cp. Exod. 19, Jer. 2), Jephthah’s daughter heads into the mountains for two months to lament her singleness.
And, while YHWH’s Passover becomes established as a statute (חֹק) associated with Israel’s preservation, Jephthah’s becomes part of a ‘custom’ (חֹק) associated with the end of his line (cp. 11.39 w. Exod. 12.24).

Ultimately, Jephthah’s legacy in Israel is a legacy of death.
The ‘deliverance’ effected by Jephthah thus comes at a high price.

What should have been remembered as a victory becomes part of the book’s liturgy of violence.

And, viewed in light of the Akedah (Gen. 22), its horror becomes even more apparent.
Whereas Abraham is commanded to sacrifice his only son (יחיד), who is delivered from death at the last moment, Jephthah decides to sacrifice his only daughter (יחידה) on his own initiative, and deliverance never comes.
Heaven remains silent, as we hear YHWH’s last statement to Israel ring out clearly in the background:

‘I will deliver you no more’ (10.13).
=== SAMSON’S ANTI-PENTECOST ===

Our next flawed deliverer is Samson, who enacts an anti-Pentecost.

Before we consider Samson’s activities, however, let’s briefly remind ourselves of the New Testament’s Pentecost event.
In Acts 1–2, a remarkable sequence of events unfolds:

Jesus is taken up into the heavenly realms;

the time of the wheat harvest comes;

the Spirit rushes on the apostles like a mighty wind;

fire falls from the heavens;
and, as the last forty years of Israel’s biblically-attested history begin, 3,000 men are miraculously saved.

In the Samson story, what looks to be a similar sequence of events begins to unfold.

A man of God (with a ‘wonderful name’) ascends into the heavenly realms (13.18–20);
the Spirit rushes on Samson (14.6), and, afterwards, the time of the wheat harvest comes (15.1).

True to Samson’s character, however, Samson’s Pentecost soon takes a brutal turn.
In contrast to the effects of the Spirit and fire in Acts 2, an attempt to take a Gentile bride ends in disaster (15.2).

The Spirit-filled Samson sends fire against the Philistines, who return the compliment (15.4–6).
Rather than save 3,000 Israelites, Samson slays 3,000 drunken Philistines (drunk with wine rather than the Spirit).

And, as the last forty years of the Judges’ history draws to a close (cp. 13.1), a great temple falls (16.27–31), just as it does in 70 AD.
=== GIBEAH’S ANTI-PASSOVER ===

We thus come to the book of Judges’s final anti-feast: the Levite and his concubine’s night in Gibeah (chs. 19–21).

Our author has saved the worst for last.
Ch. 21’s events are traditionally dated to Av, the fifth month of the year (b. Ta‘anit 30b).

If the relevant tradition is accurate, ch. 19’s events would have taken place in Nisan (cp. 20.47).

Either way, they begin in a rather Passover-esque fashion.
We have sojourners in a foreign land equipped with plenty of straw,

a host who repeatedly says he’ll let them go only to change his mind,

and a meal eaten within the safety of a house while terror lurks outside the door (cp. 19.1, 5–10, 16–19 w. Exod. 12.22–23).
As the night draws on, however, the Levite and his concubine’s story starts to morph into an anti-Passover.

The terror outside the door is certainly not the terror associated with a holy God.
And, whereas God leads (הוציא) his people out of Egypt and rescues them from danger (Exod. 12.42), the Levite casts (הוציא) his concubine into the outer darkness in order to save his own skin.

The woman is hence abandoned to face the terrors of the night alone,...
...where, like the men of Laish before her, she finds herself ‘without a deliver’ (אין מציל) (cp. 18.28) as we again hear God’s words ring out:

‘I will deliver you no more’.

Indeed, God is not the subject of a single verb in Judges 19.
He hands Gibeah over to its own desires, per Romans 1, and Judges 19 is the result.

Not until dawn breaks do the men of Gibeah ‘release’ the concubine (the verb ‘release’ [לְשַׁלַּח] is the central verb of the exodus narrative),...
...by which time, in a cruel travesty of Exodus 12.10’s stipulation, little of the woman’s life is left. (‘Let none of it be left over the next day’: cp. 19.25.)

The Levite thus arises to find blood on his doorposts, at which point, to the reader’s horror, things get worse.
While Pharaoh’s command ‘Arise!’ (Kumu!) finds its answer in the exodus, the Levite’s equivalent (Kumi!) goes unanswered.

And then, in a final anti-Passover moment, the Levite cuts his victim up ‘into bones’ (לעצמים). (‘Not a bone of the lamb is to be broken’.)
The book of Judges’ anti-feasts hence reach their climax in one of the most brutal and horrific scenes in all of Scripture,...
...which is an apt summary of the book’s portrayal of Israel—a people who have forgotten what they should remembered and (unintentionally) memorialised what they should never have done in the first place.
=== A FINAL REFLECTION ===

Suffice it to say, the book of Judges isn’t written to glamorise Israel’s history;

it’s intended to shock and disturb its readers—to reflect the depths of man’s inhumanity,
to preserve the voice of Israel’s victims,

and to document the consequences of departure from the one true God.
Thankfully, however, Judges 21 doesn’t mark the end of the Biblical narrative.

In the NT, in the person of Jesus Christ, God himself enters into man’s fallen history.
He becomes the hero to the book of Judges’ male anti-heroes and the Messiah who shares in the pain of the book’s female victims.

He doesn’t respond to violence with violence (as Gideon and Samson do), nor does he seek power and dominion (as Abimelech and Jephthah do).
Instead, like Jephthah’s daughter, he surrenders his life so a father’s promise might not be broken.

Or, to put the point in terms of Judges 19, he does precisely what the Levite should have done:
he steps out into the darkness of Gibeah and hands himself over to those who have come to do him harm (‘If it is me you seek, let these men go!’),...
...which he does so others might be spared—the spotless lamb of God, who alone can take away the sin of Israel.

THE END.

Substack version:

jamesbejon.substack.com/p/the-book-of-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Bejon

James Bejon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesBejon

14 May
THREAD: Jesus is King!

#David, #Nebuchadnezzar, #Doves, and the #Messiah.

Matthew opens his Gospel with a statement of Jesus’ right to occupy David’s throne.

Mark and Luke do too, but they do things their own way,

and reveal a lot about kingship in the process.
Kings were always part of God’s plan.

Back in Genesis 17, Abraham was told kings would come forth from his loins.

And they soon did.
From Israel’s perspective, however, kings were a two-edged sword.

They could bring about the best of times and the worst of times.
Read 20 tweets
3 May
THREAD: Belshazzar’s Riddle.

SUB-TITLE: When I consider the work of your hands...

#Babylon, #Numerology, #MedoPersia, #Stargazers: what’s not to like?

Later, a substack link. As a taster, however, let me (try to!) intrigue you with some data.
The text of Daniel 5 is patterned around a whole array of threefold groups and structures.

It consists of three paragraphs and thirty verses.
It contains three notable triplets, namely:

✅ Daniel’s trio of attributes (‘light, insight, and wisdom’),

✅ Daniel’s threefold ability (‘the ability to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems’), and
Read 28 tweets
18 Apr
THREAD: We three kings of Israel aren’t.

SUB-TITLE: A method to Matthew’s apparent madness.

As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1-17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

P.S. Substack version available at the end.
As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1–17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

Between Abraham and Israel’s first great king (David) we have fourteen generations;

between David and Israel’s great disaster (the exile) we have a further fourteen;
and between the exile and Israel’s great deliverer (the Messiah) we have our final fourteen.

Every fourteen generations, an event of epochal significance takes place, which makes Jesus’ arrival right on cue.

‘It’s almost as if God planned it’, Bart Ehrman says.
Read 36 tweets
6 Apr
<THREAD>

Pharaoh & the NT’s birth narratives:

arguably not the most seasonal of threads, but then we’ve had a bit of snow in the UK today.

And let’s face it, it’s been a strange year all round.
Raymond Brown has written a 750-page monograph on Matthew and Luke’s birth narratives. That’s about 8,500 tweets’ worth.

On pp. 34–37, Brown says the two birth narratives are largely ahistorical.
Matthew would have mentioned Luke’s census if it had taken place, Brown says,

and Luke would have mentioned the massacre of the infants.

Let’s see if we think Brown’s right.
Read 82 tweets
23 Mar
THREAD: More on the Birth Narratives.

Each year, Nativity plays combine aspects of Matthew and Luke’s narratives into a single drama (or something like one).

The journey to Bethlehem, the shepherds, the wise men, a few camels for good measure (?):

so the list goes on.
No small number of scholars, however, see Matthew and Luke’s narratives as fundamentally at odds with each another.

‘Not only do they tell completely different stories about how Jesus was born’, @BartEhrman says, ‘some of their differences appear to be irreconcilable’.
So then, let’s see how different Matthew and Luke’s narratives really are.

Below are their main components, set out side by side (in what I take to be their implied chronological order).
Read 74 tweets
18 Mar
<THREAD>

Matthew and Luke’s genealogies are often dismissed as irreconcilable.

Elsewhere, I’ve tried to show that they’re not.

Here, I’ll simply highlight some of their numerical and thematic harmonies,

which, I claim, have significant implications.
Matthew’s genealogy (1.1–17) exhibits at least a couple of non-trivial properties.

First, it’s patterned around the numbers 14 and 42.

And, second, it contains multiple allusions to the notion of a Jubilee.
Consider, for a start, how Matthew’s genealogy is patterned around the number 14:

🔹 It traces the fulfilment of YHWH’s promise to Abraham (‘I will make of you a great nation…’: Gen. 12.2), which has a gematrial value of 1,400.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(