The new SNP-Green non-coalition cooperation negotiations are an interesting evolution in Scottish politics. Their eventual outcome remains to be seen, but plenty to ponder. A thread. #SP21heraldscotland.com/news/19332430.…
At first glance, this model could suit the SNP more than the Greens. In a coalition, the Greens might have greater influence than their numbers. On an ad-hoc basis, the Greens might also have significant leverage. By contrast, a cooperation deal could moderate that influence
While details of an actual deal would be needed, the SNP would secure majority support on particular policies (and perhaps confidence and supply?). The Greens would get more say in shaping those agreed policies, and potentially one or more (junior?) ministerial posts
This cooperation model would be unusual in Europe. Presumably, the Greens would want to ensure that, in exchange for forgoing a coalition and giving up their issue-by-issue leverage, they would secure sufficient policy gains in the deal outright and post-deal policy influence
Since I have been asked: the EU will not be much interested in whether the Scottish government is SNP, SNP-Green or SNP*with Green cooperation. This issue will have no discernible impact on Scotland's European relations or the outlook for Scottish EU membership under independence
The EU institutions and member states have many preoccupations. Moreover, Green parties are coalition partners in some EU governments because they have performed sufficiently well in elections and struck coalition deals – not because it is fashionable to have Greens in government
In any case, the SNP (via the European Free Alliance) and Scottish Greens (via the European Greens) are already part of the same wider European political family. The European Greens and EFA are separate parties, but form the Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament
#COP26 is an important opportunity for Glasgow and Scotland. If a cooperation agreement is reached, I am sure it will be part of the deal's political framing. Nevertheless, too much emphasis shouldn't be placed on the COP, for coalition or cooperation
A cooperation deal wouldn't notably change the dynamics of agreeing #indyref2 with the UK government. The main arguments for #indyref2 are still a pro-referendum parliamentary majority (which exists) or majority government (which doesn't). A hybrid cooperation plan doesn't fit in
Wider questions: How would both parties approve a deal – ballot their members or rely on party executives? Would the deal cover the whole term? If #indyref2 happened by 2023, elections for the post-independence Parliament could be held before 2026 anyway – bit.ly/3nD9O3f
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DEAR MINISTER – My recommendations to the new Scottish Government on conducting and developing Scotland's European and international relations. In the olden days, I would have written an op-ed or an 'open letter', but new times, new methods. A thread. #ScotEU#ScotFP
#1 – As we know, Brexit has regrettably been realised. EU-UK relations will now unfold. Scotland's opposition to Brexit is widely, if not universally, known across Europe. That opposition no longer needs to be the central message to fellow Europeans. The focus moves to the future
#2 – A new Global Affairs Framework – or, better, a European and Global Affairs Framework – should define principles and priorities for EU and international engagement for the rest of this decade. It should be designed to operate regardless of Scotland's constitutional debate
Joint with the 'Spanish veto', the budget deficit is the most overemphasised and misinterpreted aspect of Scotland joining the EU under independence. Short version: No, Scotland's notional budget deficit does not put EU membership in doubt. A thread. thetimes.co.uk/article/scotla…
All EU members sign up to the Stability and Growth Pact and other rules designed to promote sound public finances and therefore ensure the economic and fiscal sustainability of individual Member States and the Union as a whole. These rules apply to members, not just candidates
As we all must know by now, given this is one of the only aspects of EU membership ever discussed (and poorly at that) in Scotland, these rules include a target of achieving a national budget deficit with a reference value of 3% of GDP or less. The Commission monitors compliance
EU | Scottish Labour says that Scotland and the UK should have 'as close a relationship with the EU as possible'. Which means what? Keeping the Trade and Cooperation Agreement (which is not close)? Rejoining the EU? Something else? Some measure of vision and detail would be good
BREXIT | Scottish Labour opposes using Brexit to weaken environmental standards and the 'chaos' for fisheries from the 'botched EU deal'. Yet, it proposes nothing on how it would approach the EU relationship instead. Brexit and EU relations are presented as a passive exercise
What was that? You are looking for a comprehensive, independent and realistic plan for how Scotland could join the EU? I am glad you asked... #indyref2thetimes.co.uk/article/snp-mu…
Why not try Scotland's EU Blueprint, the 136-page, 47,000-word report from @euromerchants? It covers every aspect of how an independent Scotland could join the EU and become a successful EU Member State bit.ly/SC-EU
The blueprint is available in full online and it will shortly be available in print. While we are here, let's address some of the questions and 'interesting' arguments raised in this article