This is in response to me saying Shaastras have no Blood Purity Concept. Listen folks, this guy like others is just another larper. His affiliation is more caste than Shastras hence such harsh words Are pricking him so hard lmao. caste supremists and raitas have smthin in common+
Taking convinent part and rejecting other parts. Before Raitas get excited let me tell Shastras are against Intervarna marriage and stupidity like Varna from Karma. These guys opposed Raitas bcoz their Caste Supremacy was affected not to actually support Shaastras. So now by +
Realizing their affinity and approach towards Shaastras we gotta call out such stupidity. Firstly, there is nothing wrong in having Pride in your Caste Heritage and Lineage. Why should I oppose that? What I said was that Varna is not physical which will be based on Bloodpurity +
And there is no concept of blood purity in Shaastras. Vamsha ≠ Race. Vamsha can also continue by adoption and in Yugas before Kaliyuga whe Niyoga was allowed the Vamsha would still continue but bloodline or race isn't the same. Eg, Pandu wasn't in bloodline of Puru, +
Father died and Vyasa gave birth to Pandu. Arjuna wasn't son of Pandu, he was born through Indra and Kunti. Still he's called Chandravamshi Pandava. Having pride in Vamsha is nice but it makes one thing clear that Vamsha ≠ Bloodline. Question might arise why Intervarna banned.+
The reason is that through the paternal lineage some divine qualities are passed on, which make us worthy of the rituals. For eg, in pure vaishya clan those Gunas are passed on to next generation. These are divine Gunas necessary to perform rituals as rituals are divine. +
Rituals aren't physical. You dont need science here. Genes Dna Blood are just physical and have no purity of their own. How do you say Blood A is pure thab blood B or Gene A is Pure than Gene B. Shastras say that if the Chain of Janeu/Upanayana in a clan is broken, than after +
5-6 gens clan will lose Varna. It will become Shudra. Manu 10.43 is proof. How few kshatriya clans became Shudras in lack of Kriyas(janeu). Now if their blood is pure why do they need these Samskaras for purification before entering rituals? Why they lost their Varna wo Rituals?+
Varna is given for specific purpose. Varna is a divine quality. In order to perform rituals we need the same type of divinity, and hence Varna is given. Same type of divinity means Brahmana cannot perform Kshatriya's Yajna. Bcoz varna is different. My Basic premise is +n
Be proud of clan, be proud of caste and ancestors. But Varna is passed through Paternal lineage where chain of Janeu in paternal clan isn't broken. Bloodmixing has no connection to Sankara progeny but intermixing of Non-physical Gunas disturbs flow of Varna to next generation. +
Blood Genes all are physical and anything physical is by default Impure. Purity means worthy to use in Rituals. And worthiness is decided not by scientific methods but by Shastras. Tell me something, why Gangajal and Gomutra is Pure? Is there any scientific base or just because +
Shastras say its pure so you believe it. Gangajal is so polluted today, but why do we consider it Pure? Dont give medicinal and physical benefits of gomutra or Ganga,how does physical benefits make something pure. Even onion garlic have medicinal benefits. Purity ≠ Genes blood.
भागवत 11.21.3 शुद्ध्यशुद्धी विधीयेते clearly mentions shuddhi and ashuddhi (Purity and Impurity) are prescribed (विधीयेते) through Shastra-Vidhi. We can only determine purity and impurity through Shastriya Vidhi. So where in any scripture it is written So n so blood/gene is Pure?
He's asking me to quote scripture where Caste Pride is denied. I dont disagree here. I disagree that Caste Pride on basis of Blood is Stupidity. Caste Pride on basis of Heritage, Traditions and Culture, the norms, the rituals and the glorious history is correct. +
Raghuvamsha is famous for what? Royal Blood? Or because Raghuvamshis are always speaking the Truth. When Shastras. ban something, like Intervarna, we don't need any scientific reason to justify, still i gave reason which is intermixing of the non-physical Gunas disrupts varna.
Basic thing, divine stuff like Varna depend only Divine Revelations that is Shastras. Let me show eg of Gautama Gotra which actually has Shudra bloodline. Gautama in Vayu Purana had done Niyoga with King Bali's Shudra maid & gave birth to a Shudra male. +
Through divine power he changed his Varna to Brahmana and the progeny of that is Brahmanas of Gautama Gotra. We all know Vishvamitra was Kshatriya. The Kaushika Gotra brahmanas hence would have kshatriya bloodline but Varna is Brahmana. Varna is based on lineage primarily+
All these egs dont mean that Varna is fluid like Raitas claim, but the logic of claiming superiority by bloodline is busted. Superiority is by your actions and Karmas. Birth will only give you access to rituals. Nothing else. Rituals will giv u purity.
Why do i oppose this? Bcoz this leads to Toxic ppl supporting Nehru, even rapists like Ravana. Also u shud support Iyer Abhijit despite he being a beef eater as his blood is purer than that of other Varnas. If you invite traditional brahmana to eat, his 1st question +
Would be do u perform 3 sandhyas a day? If ans is no, he will consider you impure and not eat at such places. Even though you may hv the purest blood. This toxic ideology supports brahmans doing anything and everything and justifying it by caste purity. Another guy said +
That brahmanas purified the kshatriya Women by mating with them. Sheh such filthy ideology. So these kangers will go on mating with anyone and justify it by saying their blood is pure. MB says many brahmanas did Niyoga with kshatriya women after Parashurama killled kshats, +
Ofc Supremist and Unionists Kshatriyas wont accept shastra here as its inconvenient. But this is Niyoga in the time when Brahmanas had alot of Tapas and Sadhanaa, in Kali its banned bcoz brahmanas also have become less pure & lack tapas. But basically this toxic ideology will +
Justify the adharma done by few ppl in the community. It will ask ppl to keep quiet and not call out their adharmi members. It will justify mating with others based on purity and many such other Adharmas. Hail Ritualistic Purity. And Shaastriya Supremacy.
Finally we also need to protect Brahmanical Supremacy authorized by Shastras. If we lose brahmanas we lose Dharma. We need to protect Brahmanas who are doin 3 sandhyas, promote such lifestyle & protect those who denote life to shastra studies. So many brahmans we hv lost +
By lost i mean quit their traditional jobs and are not into shastra studies. Such ppl become big corporates and stuff but that doesn't help dharma. We need those Shastriya brahmanas and ascertain their Superiority and protect them at all costs if we care for Dharma. Jay Shrirama.
She has misquoted Jagadguru, when I went to the chapter and verse, she has presented only half of it. The last part is conveniently ommitted. It is true unlike Smartas Vallabhacharya does not accept Varna at birth, but he does accept eligibility at birth which ill elaborate now +
I have seen many political Hindus use Vaishnavacharyas to peddle false liberal notions, like Ramanujacharya for egalitarian equality, Madhvacharya for his cherrypicked statements on Varna by quality, The Yudhishthira-Sarpa conversation in MB and now Vallabhacharya. +
Varna isn't Jati, it is clear. Even the Smaartas she hates Shankaracharya doesn't accept any substance called Jati. But here we are not talking of Jati which is Varna synonym, but Jati which is an inseperable inherent attribute, which the Naiyayika system proposes. +
Today is Janaki Navami. Jay Maa Janaki.
Short thread to say why dont trUST fools by denying Agni Pariksha. This is an Insult to the immense love of Shri Rama and you'll soon know why.
Rama says त्वानुजाने which is a pun, it means I allow you to enter and I also know the Reality. This also means that Rama never asked her to enter fire. Sita herself orders Lakshmana, Lakshmana is struck. He looks at Rama, Rama nods and by getting asked by both, he gets wood. +
In a real world, this serves as a great message. See how feminists trap men and ruin their life/career and men also pollute women and ruin chaste women's lives. But only their closed ppl know the truth, once you are defamed or even a simple accusation is put up, the world who +
I will share a very unpopular and blunt opinion, not opinion but fact today. Something by which I may get cancelled by Dimwits. But I will say read entire 1st. Puri Shankaracharya isn't Finat Authority on Dharma, not Puri Shankaracharya, Any Shankaracharya. Or Vaishnavacharya. +
I saw a video of Puri Shankaracharya declaring post of Shankaracharya as Sarvabhauma Acharya, and few Advaitis also in my fb feed have expressed opposition to such a narrative. A person may have utmost Gurubhakti, but disagreement from Guru on basis of Shastras is justified, +
Ramanuja disagreed from his Guru, Shankara from his Guru. Such instances are alot. The basic thing most Political Hindus dont understand that the disagreement isn't on emotional/personal/politcial/social basis but only on Shastra-level. Such disagreement is healthy & i would also
Why do we need Shaastras? Are Shaastras Scientific?
Ans = We dont need Shaastras for stuff that is scientific. If it can be percieved or understood through reasoning, rationalization and physical methods, how will Shaastras tell us something unique we couldn't know otherwise? +
Imagine a horse standing in front, i say to a friend besides me 'look a horse', he replies back 'duh, i can see it'. There's really nothing new abt that restatement, the Vedas etc don't restate stuff we already know/can know by physical proofs. It would be useless if they did. +
What is Stuff we cannot understand without shaastras? Dharma = Yajnas Vyavahara Shuddhi Ashuddhi etc, there is no source to know why should a man do Jyotishtoma Yajna for heaven. There is no source why Cow is pure. Only shaastras tell us this. Perceiving Morality through reason +
The biggest contribution of Bharatiya Vaidika Arya Hindu Culture to the entire world in terms of Upasana is the Tantrika concept of 'Devo bhootva devam yajet', which has inspired Sufis Christianity etc. The concept is present in code form in the Vedas but expanded thru Tantras. +
Modern historians and indologists includi hindu ones like to attribute diff type of evolution in the shaastras, some of it is true, sm of it is enforced. Before understanding this uniqje and revolutionary concept, rmv d mindset that Yoga Upasana etc came into Vedas thru Tantra.
Also ppl lIke Winternitz confined the word Tantra only to the Shalta school, which also is a huge blunder and the modern understanding of this word has become limited to magicstuff. Which also isn't true. So by tantra i mean the Aagamas, vaishnava shaiva shakta Saura skaanda etc.
On the anniv of Bra, let us take in mind few flaws and unethical means he used to spew hate against hindus. He was against Caste, but never chose Atheism like Savarkar, chose a religion equally casteist sharing so many parallels to Hinduism. +
Myth= buddhism believes in equality. No. Buddhism Jainism Hinduism all 3 believe in Samsara, samsara means birth is based on prior karma and karma is due to birth, such circle keeps continuing and this cycle has no beginning. Buddhism cannot exist without Pratitya-samutpada +
Which promotes prior birth's karma determines the type of birth one has. Aatma goes through several births before getting human birth, if he gets human birth he becomes subject to Karma. Animals etc cajt do karma, they only bear the consequences of karma they did in human life. +