Thread by @realitycheckind

Okay, seeing blank faces. Here is how the fallacy works in Dravidian - if you work in "Policy" or "India Liberal Intelligentsia" this is go above your head. Hence you will dismiss as 'silly'.

Maalan -> came from Uzbek
Babur -> came from Uzbek

same? purpose of this?

This is to 'reduce' Maalan to Babar. This logic is actually a danger to muslims, but Drav do it anyway.

Similar to reducing UVeSa to Bishop Caldwell.. both are foreigners contributing to Tamil.

This fallacy ignores the "Time" aspect. Dont contest the steppe part. EVEN if Maalan (A #NonDravidianStock ) and Babur are from same place. Maalan came 3000 years ahead of Babur, or 2500 or whatever. So there are two aspects

1. first possession
2. civilization development

Both Maalan and Babar can claim to have contributed to civilization development -- but if Maalan came 2500 years ahead and he was an oppressor who imposed or stole cultural elements then the ENTIRE span of development in historical period is HIS !!

so its like this :

You have friends in your WA group.

* some friends studied with you from LKG
* some friends are office colleagues

One takeaway from my #Dravidian Tamizh deep dive. These activists are GUIDED and highly TRAINED. They lack free thought ; which is why you dont see even 5% say '' ooh subavee.. this smells a bit like rotten fish..'

that is the potency. One mind 10000 voices.

A fox makes NO assumptions. see my header pic.

If I didnt put this response out there.. what do you think would happen? TTs would petrify and offer to make policy because they cant contest the principle.

Once again the "Steppe part" runs afoul of the Dravidian principle of Brahmin defamation and humiliation. Steppe warriors are glorious .. hence they contort their position to 'beggars from steppe' -- but that is inverse shameful to #D. Imagine losing civilization to beggars?

I have written in Tamil about this last year titled 'The Beggars Power" ?👇👇

realitycheck.wordpress.com/2020/04/14/%E0…