Thread by @DawsonSField

Why does everyone always follow the laser pointer?

Watched everyone chasing bad interpretations of the Fauci emails yesterday, while almost everyone missed the most important thing.

Did you notice the criminal investigation revealed in the emails? It isn't aimed at Fauci...

The focus yesterday was on 2 topics. People sending unverified info to Fauci, leading to a false claim that "Fauci knew" & an anti-mask email that he wrote early in the pandemic. But we always knew Fauci was against masks for several reasons.

1st he was against them due to a lack of evidence that they worked which was met with 'new' studies that it did work.
2nd Fauci was afraid that people would hoard masks like TP & medical facilities would be unable to get them.
Fauci did not impose the mask mandates, CDC did!

But let's get to the important revelation that @MitchGoat70 spotted Tuesday: FOIA exemption (b)(7)(A)
Withheld to avoid interfering with a law enforcement proceeding...

This likely means that Daszak's email to Fauci was part of a criminal conspiracy to influence Fauci.

No other emails involving Fauci are redacted due to criminal investigation. If he were the target, more of his emails would be coverd with that redaction.

The timeline of this is very critical, in late January & early February some of Fauci's staff are entertaining the theory that COVID-19 was engineered. Then Daszak & his allies go on a global disinformation campaign to claim it was a natural virus.
summit.news/2021/02/09/who…

Then we get one weird email, weird because this is a FOIA for Fauci's emails but if Fauci is on it then his name was redacted. It makes no sense. It is Fauci's Chief of Staff recommending to someone to not become a co-author on Daszak's forthcoming paper.
B4 is trade secrets...

Was Dazsak & his coauthors attempting to incriminate someone by making them a coauthor on the paper so they could use that as leverage for their natural virus scheme?
I believe the article discussed is this one published on 2/26/20.
abyssum.org/2020/02/26/esc…

Then on April 17th, President Trump is asked a question about the Wuhan Lab gain-of-function research at a press conference. Trump discusses the funding of Dazsak's bat coronavirus research at WIV as a possible cause of the pandemic.

The next day Dazsak is emailing Fauci, an email that's now redacted because it's under criminal investigation. Which certainly breaks the dam on coverage of this, allowing Vanity Fair to publish an article about Daszak's efforts to nix the lab leak theory!

https://twitter.com/KatherineEban/status/1400403612325515266?s=20

Now if you think Fauci is part of this conspiracy under investigation you have to deal with several other issues. First, 3300 pages of Fauci emails with no redactions for law enforcement purposes. That is called 3300 clues that there is no other evidence of crimes in those emails

You also have to consider what Fauci & his organization did in response to Daszak's efforts to butter up Fauci.
They cancelled Daszak's grants 6 days later!
cbsnews.com/news/trump-adm…

So Fauci's response too Daszak's efforts to sway him against the lab theory, lead to his agency cancelling Daszak's funding.
npr.org/sections/goats…

Daszak ran to every organization with a microphone to tell them of Trump's evil deed pressuring Fauci to cancel his research. I love the line "Scientifically this doesn't make sense" which is because the funding wasn't cancelled for scientific reasons!

I don't think it is a coincidence that they gave Dazsak plenty of time to take enough rope to hang himself & any co-conspirators. Many of whom were picked by China to lead the WHO 'investigation' that claimed in March 2021 that it wasn't a lab leak. A theory now imploding!

I can't wait to read the indictments for those who helped write this report only to see it fall apart so quickly.

A report calling for investigating every theory except a lab leak!
news.yahoo.com/report-dismiss…

For more history on Pete Daszak's Gain-of-Function research on bat coronaviruses at Wuhan Institute of Virology, I did a thread on it last May discussing his role in a possible lab leak.

https://twitter.com/DawsonSField/status/1259991735461175299?s=20

One other issue that is popping up, claims that UPenn researcher Michael Betts was giving Fauci good advice that he ignored. But Dr. Betts says it isn't him. Is it a random coincidence? Was someone posing as Betts to give Fauci advice?

https://twitter.com/SKMorefield/status/1400101507358470152?s=20

It would be interesting if someone was posing as researchers in the hopes of getting Fauci to take their advice....