Finished reading this brilliant essay on Tagore’s Perspective on Decolonizing Education. The article discusses 'at length Tagore’s philosophy of education, as well as his concrete efforts to establish an alternative model of a school and a university. oxfordre.com/education/view…
Tagore was a polymath who spent most of his adult life building a school and a university, alongside creating an impressive opus of literary and artistic work. However, Tagore was himself unsuccessful within the mainstream school and higher education system of British India.
Tagore's critique of Colonial Education:
Tagore wrote his first critical essay on education, শিক্ষার হেরফের (“Sikshar Herfer”), in 1892, which was later published by Visva Bharati University in English as “Vagaries of Education” (Dasgupta, 2009, pp. 440–441).
In this excellent essay, Tagore highlights some serious problems with the mainstream system of education in India, including education in a foreign language, involving unfamiliar content, and imparted by poorly educated teachers.
According to Tagore, education encouraged rote memorization of rules of grammar and sentence structure more than critical thinking and understanding. Hence, he argued strongly in favor of promoting education for Indian children in their mother tongue.
However, Tagore did not reject the idea of learning foreign languages and other cultures. He was not against modern Western scientific & technological education. He emphasized early education in the mother tongue with familiar content to build a strong foundation for students.
Tagore on Structure of Schools:
Tagore launched a scathing critique of the entire design and architecture of the school system in colonial India in the essay শিক্ষ্যা সমস্যা (“Shiksa Shamasya”), meaning “The Problem of Education,” in 1906.
Tagore further argues that the schooling systems in Europe were an integral part of their society, while in India;
Reflecting on his own experiences as a child, Tagore says “the child’s life is subjected to the education factory, lifeless, colourless, dissociated from the context of the universe, within bare white walls staring like eyeballs of the dead” (cited in Dasgupta, 2009, p. 108).
Tagore on Pedagogy:
This painful pedagogic process of education in the factory model of schools was symbolically critiqued by Tagore in his own artistic way through the medium of a satirical short story, তোতাকাহিনী (“A Parrot’s Training”), in 1918.
The entire satirical children’s story was a parody of the mainstream bookish school system that deprives the child of all the joys of learning and kills all creative possibilities. Tagore’s critique of bookish knowledge can be also found in the essay আবরণ (“Children’s Clothes”);
The harrowing and painful impact of such a “parrot’s training” kind of discipline and punishing pedagogy on the child’s psychology has been also recorded by Tagore (1917a, p.6) in his childhood reminiscences, where he recollects some of his educational experiences:
Tagore on Decolonizing Education:
Tagore strongly believed that the higher and the most important purpose of education was to achieve freedom and joy in learning for creativity and self-fulfillment. Tagore (1919b), in the essay “My School,” writes;
According to him, an ideal education system for any society needs to centered around its culture. In his essay “The Centre of Indian Culture,” Tagore writes;
“our education should be in full touch with our complete life, economical, intellectual, aesthetic, social & spiritual."
In conclusion, it can be said that Tagore’s decolonizing of education was indeed a very courageous, ambitious, and successful project in British India. As Collins (2011b) argues;
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nowhere the inconsistencies and contradictions of colonial policies are more evident than in the educational policies. While initially, the colonial officials showed hesitation in investing in education, soon they realized that education could become a tool to legitimize power.
While the colonial educational policies were meant to create a mimicry- complete assimilation of the local population to the culture of their colonial masters in dress, behavior, language, and ways of thinking, they were challenged by nationalist institutions of that time.
Ashis Nandy argues how even these nationalist institutions were later captured by ruling elites who used them for their political and ideological interests. Even in the post-colonial polity, it was the 'colonial consensus' that defined the workings of educational institutions.
'Bodily Dirt' as a source of deadly germs: Hygiene practices in Sahibs’ Bungalows
Anxiety about Indian dirt, in general, was particularized onto individual servants as potential careers of deadly germs into the household on their bodies. [1/6]
Andrew Balfour, writing in 1921, advised that ‘wherever possible it is a wise precaution to have native servants medically examined before engaging with them’. The hands of servants were regarded with particular distaste. [2/6]
During a Cholera scare in the 1930s, Margery Hall made her ayah scrub her hands with Dettol before she started her work, while she personally disinfected the dishes before and after meals and used disinfectant liberally throughout the compound. [3/6]
Iqbal was born in 1983 in Muridke, Lahore, into a poor Christian family. Shortly after Iqbal's birth, his father, Saif Masih, abandoned the family. Iqbal's mother, Inayat, worked as a housecleaner.
In 1986, Iqbal’s family needed money to pay for a celebration. For a very poor family in Pakistan, the only way to borrow money is to ask a local employer. Iqbal's family borrowed 600 rupees from a man who owned a carpet-weaving business.
In return, Iqbal was put under the system of peshgi (loans) which is inherently inequitable; where the employer has all the power. At age four, Iqbal was sold by his family to pay off their debts.
Most British officials demonstrated their ‘moral authority' in an arrogant manner. In Richard Burton’s words, “it was the tight pantaloons,..., the authoritative voice, the procurance manner, and broken Hindostani which impressed the Indians”. [1/6]
Those who relied on such a manner to demonstrate British superiority matched this with the firm belief that the bodily demeanor of the Indian should demonstrate his inferiority. The Indian body was thus transformed into a battleground, with chairs and shoes as the weapons. [2/6]
A calculated insult was the failure to offer a chair to an Indian gentleman waiting to visit a British official. In the colonial context, the chair was invested with emotional value. Henderson characterized the chair as ‘the visible sign of our civilization’. [3/6]
The British followed the examples of their Indian subjects where hair was concerned. In Britain, combing and powdering were preferred to washing the hair, which was regarded with anxiety and thought to induce headache and toothache. [1/5]
Fanny Parks, in her book Wanderings, asserted that the hair washing was a repeated activity in India, and in the appendix to her book a recipe for ‘shampoo’, that she thought this was something unusual in Britain. [2/5]
The recipe was a mixture of basun (a type of pulse), egg yolks, and juice of limes, and it was very similar to a recipe that was given by Colesworthy Grant, who described this means of cleaning the hair as the virtue the British had learned from the Indians. [3/5]
The examination of company officials’ bathing and cleanliness practices allows us for an exploration into how far the British adoption of Indian practice was a result of the significant and lasting impact which India had on the British who lived here. [1/8]
In Britain, a daily splash of water on the face & hands was regarded as a quite sufficient cleanliness practice, even among the middle classes. Writing in 1801, a doctor commented that ‘most men resident and ladies in London neglect washing their bodies from year to year.’ [2/8]
Even the propriety of washing the whole surface of the body was often questioned, as one Richard Reece remarked in a journal called Medical Companion that washing hands and faces daily was sufficient enough to keep one’s body healthy. [⅜]