For those unfamiliar with Olympus or Frax, theyโre actually quite similar protocols
Both have a protocol treasury acting as a massive whale. That treasury influences the market through market operations to manifest desirable behavior
In the case of Olympus, that behavior is currently to feed the treasury with assets and liquidity.
In the case of Frax, that behavior is a stable peg at $1.
Frax cares about price and less about backing. Olympus cares about backing and less about price.
In their 6 month history, FRAX has never broken peg. That gives us confidence in the safety of our reserves.
With its greater efficiency versus something like dai, and the collaborative nature of the team and project, Frax starts looking pretty attractive
So what might this partnership look like?
The nature of these protocols means the possibilities are pretty expansive
Thereโs a few obvious ones:
We can open a pool between OHM and FRAX (like we are on Monday) to allow trading between our assets.
This one is pretty standard, not that cool
Olympus can accumulate that pool through bonds. It gets a bit more interesting here.
By buying liquidity, we can drive continual demand for FRAX-OHM and as a result, demand for FRAX.
FRAX can do the same on their end. By minting FRAX with their excess reserves, they can drive demand for OHM and OHM bonds.
This has already been proposed on the FRAX forum. @samkazemian voiced interest in kicking it off with $1m in bonds from the FRAX treasury. Thatโs pretty cool.
We can also drive demand for FRAX alone via reserve bonds, allowing us to assist Frax in providing liquidity outside of our own market
All of these fuel the growth of the other. We can create strong recursive loops of liquidity and demand for our respective currencies.
Now what happens when you bring the Frax Price Index into the picture? This is a really ambitious idea that Iโm excited to see take form in the coming years
Youโll have FRAX hard peg itself to a CPI-esque set of metrics
Youโll have OHM soft peg itself to those metrics through its FRAX backing
Iโd expect this to start looking like the forex market. Youโll have multiple loosely correlated, high-liquidity low-volatility floating currencies trading against and feeding into each other
The decentralized reserve currency space wonโt (or at least shouldnโt) be winner take all.
There will certainly be dominant players (and Iโll be damned if OHM isnโt one of them), but I expect a whole new industry to form around the ideas that OHM and FRAX are spearheading
There is immense power to cooperation between these monetary authorities. We are whales in our own markets, and we can be whales in each others
This distributes market responsibility and should decrease risk on both ends
The outcome if we are successful is legitimate alternatives to fiat pegged stablecoins. True decentralized currencies, not just mislabeled decentralized assets.
Thereโs a long road to get there, but Iโm excited to take this first step.
- Non sovereign currency narrative is dying because existing attempts have failed
- They've failed because they don't try
- A non-sovereign currency needs a non-sovereign central bank
- A currency with a decentralized bank has the best chance of replacing stablecoins
1/x
Bitcoin has been around for over 12 years now. During that time, it has gone from a super volatile, super well-performing asset to...a slightly-less volatile, still well-performing asset
How they're designed, how they've worked so far, and the role of reserve vs liquidity bonds
A ๐งต๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
2/21 - Bonds have become the cornerstone of Olympus
Today they are our primary treasury accumulation mechanism; and, with the passage of a recent proposal, they're slated to remain in that role scattershot.page/#/olympusdao.eโฆ
3/21 - But there was actually a time when bonds weren't in the picture at all
The initial design here centered solely on a sales contract, which would sell and buy directly to/from users
New protocols are being built that can never die.
๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
2/20 - The first generation of algorithmic stablecoins were solely centered around incentive and mechanism design.
Starting with AMPL and the rebase, the concept of elastic supply blossomed into an entire sub-genre of DeFi
3/20 - Mechanisms and incentives are an important part of the success of any token, but algos especially. Certain behaviors need to be rewarded, and some behaviors even punished, to manifest the desired behavior of the system