Most of us have a rough idea of the origin of the 1919-21 race riots. The war had drawn African American families from southern fields to northern factories.
At war's end, these new arrivals faced resentment and violence from demobilized white soldiers. 2/x
All true! But there's more to the story - and that "more" is every bit as relevant to the politics of the 2020s as the race pogroms of 1919-21. 3/x
1919 also saw terrible non-racial violence: the most tumultuous labor strife in US history, culminating a steel strike that involved 350,000 workers - and that ended in dismal defeat for organized labor. 4/x ohiohistorycentral.org/w/Great_Steel_…
Here's crucial context for both riots and strikes:
The First World War had generated significant price inflation in the United States. At war's end, US economic and monetary decided to force a return to pre-war price levels. That implied big cuts in wages. 5/x
The deflation of 1919 hit workers especially hard since wages had not kept pace with prices during the war. Wages had lagged during the wartime inflation; now they were to lead the way in postwar deflation. 6/x
The postwar deflation pushed the United States into a steep depression: the US economy actually contracted faster (if not quite as deeply) as in 1930-33.
It was this depression - not the League of Nations - that won the Republicans party their landslide in 1920. 7/x
Wages and prices deflated, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates in 1921. The economy revived - or rather, the US economy did. Without thinking very much about it, US authorities had triggered a *global* economic crisis. And that didn't end in 1921. 8/x
The war had left every other industrial society crushed by debts: Britain owed war debts to the US France and Italy owed war debts to Britain. Germany owed reparations to France and Belgium. (Soviet Russia of course had already defaulted on all its debts.) 9/x
The only way to meet those debts was by exporting to the strongest consumer market, the United States. And in 1921 and 1923, the newly elected Republicans imposed tariffs to prevent those exports. 10/x
Those US decisions thwarted recovery in Europe. They plunged the US farm economy into a decade-long depression. If Europeans could not sell manufactures to the US, they could not buy food from the US. 11/x
And in the northern cities, they exacerbated pre-existing racial and religious hostilities, symbolized by the Second Ku Klux Klan of the 1920s. 12/x
The even greater disaster of the 1930s has blocked much of this history from memory. Weirdly, the people who do remember it are economic cultists who regard the deflation of 1919-20 as a brilliant idea and resounding success. (See here theatlantic.com/international/…) 13/x
Might a more accommodating economic policy in 1919-21 have mitigated race and class tensions in the United States - eased acceptance in the North of newcomers from the South? It sure would not have hurt. 14/x
And the United States had experience to learn from. The decision in 1873 to deflate prices to pre 1861 levels had cost the Republicans the House of Representatives in 1874 - and brought Reconstruction to an end soon after. 15/x
Maybe these are impossible might-have-beens. But as we in 2021 hear urgent advice to start deflating RIGHT AWAY - it's worth looking back at sad passages of history to re-learn that deflation has costs at least as serious as inflation. END
... US economic and monetary AUTHORITIES ...
... insert period after "Britain owed war debts to the US" ...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In one party, a crucial blocking group condones and excuses the 1/6 attack on Congress.
In the other party, a crucial blocking group insists that democracy-protection can only proceed with permission from the first party.
That's not a stable equilibrium, to put it mildly.
The British comedy duo Flanders & Swann used to do a bit explaining UK politics to US audiences: "We have the Labour party, which you in America would call a socialist party. Facing them are the Conservatives, which you in America would call ... a socialist party." 1/x
It's worth thinking about how much lower long-term federal spending would be had Hillary Clinton won in 2016 instead of Trump. 1/x nytimes.com/2021/05/27/bus…
Had Clinton won in 2016, GOP would have surely kept House in 2018. Coronavirus would have been dealt with much more effectively in December 2019-January 2020 than under the inept Trump. Much, much less money would then have been needed for COVID relief. 2/x
Facing a Democratic president in 2017-2021, congressional GOP would have continued to demand lower spending, smaller deficits. 3/x
I don't think everyone realizes that the phrase "Roaring Twenties" - referring to the decade of the 1920s - was not coined entirely as a compliment. 1/x
The phrase "Roaring Twenties" was derived from the "Roaring Forties," the very powerful westerly winds that blow between 40 and 50 degrees latitude in the southern hemisphere. The Roaring Forties could hugely speed sailing ships - but also swamp and sink them. 2/x
Whoever borrowed the adjective "roaring" for the decade of the 1920s didn't mean to say that the decade was serenely prosperous, but that it was wild, nerve-wracking, and dangerous, like the far south seas below Australia. 3/x
This piece has sparked a lot of comment, some of it very angry. Almost all the comments are answered in the body of the piece, but let me underscore one point here ...
The origin of the coronavirus - in a Chinese lab, in an animal - remains unsettled. It's important to resolve the question as best we can. The Chinese authorities have not been transparent - and that's itself a warning that something important may be buried here. 2/x
If the lab-theory proves true, the political consequences will be serious. There's a whole other article to be written gaming out what those consequences would be, but ... serious. 3/x
When the Obama White House in 2009 declined to take questions from Fox News reporters on the grounds that "Fox was not a news organization," the rest of the White House press gallery went to bat for Fox. EG: theatlantic.com/culture/archiv…
A decade later, the Fox affiliate in Florida is accepting exclusive media rights to coverage of taxpayer-funded state business from Governor Rick DeSantis. 2/x
The bend-over-backwards determination to recognize Fox as a legitimate news organization is never reciprocated by Fox itself, however. 3/x