In one party, a crucial blocking group condones and excuses the 1/6 attack on Congress.
In the other party, a crucial blocking group insists that democracy-protection can only proceed with permission from the first party.
That's not a stable equilibrium, to put it mildly.
The British comedy duo Flanders & Swann used to do a bit explaining UK politics to US audiences: "We have the Labour party, which you in America would call a socialist party. Facing them are the Conservatives, which you in America would call ... a socialist party." 1/x
How to reverse-engineer that joke about US politics? The Democratic party is supposedly liberal, but is also profoundly institutionally conservative. The Republican party is supposedly conservative, but is institutionally radical and even insurrectionary.
Years ago, a Canadian magazine set a contest to devise a Canadian equivalent to "As American as apple pie."
The winner: "As Canadian as possible, under the circumstances."
You could also reverse-engineer that joke to describe GOP and Democratic attitudes to the use of power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Most of us have a rough idea of the origin of the 1919-21 race riots. The war had drawn African American families from southern fields to northern factories.
At war's end, these new arrivals faced resentment and violence from demobilized white soldiers. 2/x
All true! But there's more to the story - and that "more" is every bit as relevant to the politics of the 2020s as the race pogroms of 1919-21. 3/x
It's worth thinking about how much lower long-term federal spending would be had Hillary Clinton won in 2016 instead of Trump. 1/x nytimes.com/2021/05/27/bus…
Had Clinton won in 2016, GOP would have surely kept House in 2018. Coronavirus would have been dealt with much more effectively in December 2019-January 2020 than under the inept Trump. Much, much less money would then have been needed for COVID relief. 2/x
Facing a Democratic president in 2017-2021, congressional GOP would have continued to demand lower spending, smaller deficits. 3/x
I don't think everyone realizes that the phrase "Roaring Twenties" - referring to the decade of the 1920s - was not coined entirely as a compliment. 1/x
The phrase "Roaring Twenties" was derived from the "Roaring Forties," the very powerful westerly winds that blow between 40 and 50 degrees latitude in the southern hemisphere. The Roaring Forties could hugely speed sailing ships - but also swamp and sink them. 2/x
Whoever borrowed the adjective "roaring" for the decade of the 1920s didn't mean to say that the decade was serenely prosperous, but that it was wild, nerve-wracking, and dangerous, like the far south seas below Australia. 3/x
This piece has sparked a lot of comment, some of it very angry. Almost all the comments are answered in the body of the piece, but let me underscore one point here ...
The origin of the coronavirus - in a Chinese lab, in an animal - remains unsettled. It's important to resolve the question as best we can. The Chinese authorities have not been transparent - and that's itself a warning that something important may be buried here. 2/x
If the lab-theory proves true, the political consequences will be serious. There's a whole other article to be written gaming out what those consequences would be, but ... serious. 3/x
When the Obama White House in 2009 declined to take questions from Fox News reporters on the grounds that "Fox was not a news organization," the rest of the White House press gallery went to bat for Fox. EG: theatlantic.com/culture/archiv…
A decade later, the Fox affiliate in Florida is accepting exclusive media rights to coverage of taxpayer-funded state business from Governor Rick DeSantis. 2/x
The bend-over-backwards determination to recognize Fox as a legitimate news organization is never reciprocated by Fox itself, however. 3/x