@tishya_saran this comes from lacknof understanding anything abt hinduism. Hinduism says absolute freedom is a myth while abrahms say free will, there is nobody out of the boundary of Dharma and you have no right to choose what you want. Morality based on choice leads to hedonism
If such is your imagination of hinduism leave it alone. Just speak as an atheist against hindu hatred and expose hypocrisy of the left. Manu Smriti is sanctioned in Ramayana Mahabharata Jaimini Sutras Apastamba Sutras and also directly in Vedasn"यद्वै...भेषजम्". +
Even Bhagavan when takes an Avatara becomes adherent to Dharma, the Buddha who criticised Dharma is not worshipped by any Hindu hence ane Buddhists are not peaceful ppl. This myth also can he busted by reading history of Buddhist violence and expansionism. +
Hinduism does have provision of Heaven and Hell. And thats directly from Vedas. As Mimamsakas are criticised by Krishna who only view Vedas from the pt of heaven. Diff between Abrahms & us is that heaven and hell isnt our focus pt. Following Dharma is, and Dharma is that which +
Is omnipresent and sustains everything. Knowledge Bhakti Dharma (Ahimsa satya etc) is our focus. We dont promote violence based on Dieties, but if something is threat to Dharma than it is sanctioned. Expansionism isnt promoted but Propogation is definitely. So if you think +
Disobeying Shastras will have no punishment, you're incorrect. "Those who disobey the Shastras and do what they please do not get fruitfullness in this loka, nor do they obtain happiness in this or other loka, nor do they have moksha" Krishna Gita 16.24.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with कौण्ड भट्ट

कौण्ड भट्ट Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kaundabhatta

31 May
This is in response to me saying Shaastras have no Blood Purity Concept. Listen folks, this guy like others is just another larper. His affiliation is more caste than Shastras hence such harsh words Are pricking him so hard lmao. caste supremists and raitas have smthin in common+
Taking convinent part and rejecting other parts. Before Raitas get excited let me tell Shastras are against Intervarna marriage and stupidity like Varna from Karma. These guys opposed Raitas bcoz their Caste Supremacy was affected not to actually support Shaastras. So now by +
Realizing their affinity and approach towards Shaastras we gotta call out such stupidity. Firstly, there is nothing wrong in having Pride in your Caste Heritage and Lineage. Why should I oppose that? What I said was that Varna is not physical which will be based on Bloodpurity +
Read 26 tweets
26 May
She has misquoted Jagadguru, when I went to the chapter and verse, she has presented only half of it. The last part is conveniently ommitted. It is true unlike Smartas Vallabhacharya does not accept Varna at birth, but he does accept eligibility at birth which ill elaborate now +
I have seen many political Hindus use Vaishnavacharyas to peddle false liberal notions, like Ramanujacharya for egalitarian equality, Madhvacharya for his cherrypicked statements on Varna by quality, The Yudhishthira-Sarpa conversation in MB and now Vallabhacharya. +
Varna isn't Jati, it is clear. Even the Smaartas she hates Shankaracharya doesn't accept any substance called Jati. But here we are not talking of Jati which is Varna synonym, but Jati which is an inseperable inherent attribute, which the Naiyayika system proposes. +
Read 29 tweets
21 May
Today is Janaki Navami. Jay Maa Janaki.
Short thread to say why dont trUST fools by denying Agni Pariksha. This is an Insult to the immense love of Shri Rama and you'll soon know why.
Rama says त्वानुजाने which is a pun, it means I allow you to enter and I also know the Reality. This also means that Rama never asked her to enter fire. Sita herself orders Lakshmana, Lakshmana is struck. He looks at Rama, Rama nods and by getting asked by both, he gets wood. +
In a real world, this serves as a great message. See how feminists trap men and ruin their life/career and men also pollute women and ruin chaste women's lives. But only their closed ppl know the truth, once you are defamed or even a simple accusation is put up, the world who +
Read 9 tweets
16 May
I will share a very unpopular and blunt opinion, not opinion but fact today. Something by which I may get cancelled by Dimwits. But I will say read entire 1st. Puri Shankaracharya isn't Finat Authority on Dharma, not Puri Shankaracharya, Any Shankaracharya. Or Vaishnavacharya. +
I saw a video of Puri Shankaracharya declaring post of Shankaracharya as Sarvabhauma Acharya, and few Advaitis also in my fb feed have expressed opposition to such a narrative. A person may have utmost Gurubhakti, but disagreement from Guru on basis of Shastras is justified, +
Ramanuja disagreed from his Guru, Shankara from his Guru. Such instances are alot. The basic thing most Political Hindus dont understand that the disagreement isn't on emotional/personal/politcial/social basis but only on Shastra-level. Such disagreement is healthy & i would also
Read 26 tweets
11 May
Why do we need Shaastras? Are Shaastras Scientific?
Ans = We dont need Shaastras for stuff that is scientific. If it can be percieved or understood through reasoning, rationalization and physical methods, how will Shaastras tell us something unique we couldn't know otherwise? +
Imagine a horse standing in front, i say to a friend besides me 'look a horse', he replies back 'duh, i can see it'. There's really nothing new abt that restatement, the Vedas etc don't restate stuff we already know/can know by physical proofs. It would be useless if they did. +
What is Stuff we cannot understand without shaastras? Dharma = Yajnas Vyavahara Shuddhi Ashuddhi etc, there is no source to know why should a man do Jyotishtoma Yajna for heaven. There is no source why Cow is pure. Only shaastras tell us this. Perceiving Morality through reason +
Read 21 tweets
22 Apr
The biggest contribution of Bharatiya Vaidika Arya Hindu Culture to the entire world in terms of Upasana is the Tantrika concept of 'Devo bhootva devam yajet', which has inspired Sufis Christianity etc. The concept is present in code form in the Vedas but expanded thru Tantras. +
Modern historians and indologists includi hindu ones like to attribute diff type of evolution in the shaastras, some of it is true, sm of it is enforced. Before understanding this uniqje and revolutionary concept, rmv d mindset that Yoga Upasana etc came into Vedas thru Tantra.
Also ppl lIke Winternitz confined the word Tantra only to the Shalta school, which also is a huge blunder and the modern understanding of this word has become limited to magicstuff. Which also isn't true. So by tantra i mean the Aagamas, vaishnava shaiva shakta Saura skaanda etc.
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(