These papers are exciting for me because, by working with a host of terrific co-authors, they take my alliance work in new directions and employ a variety of methods: historic case studies; text-as-data; survey experiments; & foreign policy analysis.
More to come!!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As pointed out in a previous #KeepRealismReal thread, Waltz key "realist" text, Theory of International Politics (TIP), doesn't even contain the word "realism", let alone "neorealism"
Morgenthau takes the idea of a world state seriously. As James Speer wrote decades ago in @World_Pol: "Morgenthaus' entire treatment of world politics thus centers upon the requirements for the world state." cambridge.org/core/journals/…
This is not surprising. By the late 1940s, creating a world government was prominently viewed as necessary for avoiding nuclear annihilation
Don't get me wrong: Carr definitely talks about Realism in the text. But the text is about much more than that (as he writes in Chapter 2)
Carr began the text in the late 1930s. By then, the onset of another war seemed likely: Germany had remilitarized the Rhineland, Japan had invaded Manchuria, Italy conquered Abyssinia, etc, etc.
When I teach my Intro to International Relations students how "Realism" developed as an idea/theory/school/paradigm, I ground it in the real world issues facing scholars at the time they wrote.
Why? because that's what those scholars did. Hence, #KeepRealismReal
I start with work written in the 1920s.
That means no Machiavelli, no Hobbes, or no Thucydides