Real-estate listings should include prevalence of gun-ownership in a 50-mile radius and number of annual mass shootings in the region.
Time to change what a “bad neighborhood” is.
…and introduce a meaningful tax on guns and gun violence.
No one should say “this is a great place to raise kids” about neighborhoods where even one person has an assault rifle.
The metric would be simple.
Example: Staten Island (pop 474k) has 4x the gun ownership per capita of the Bronx (pop 1.4m).
If that reads as safer or more frer to some people, Staten Island is for them. If not, maybe time for the Bronx. Take race, class, politics out of the real-estate equation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Because it seems possible that Trump’s loss, the failure of the coup to install Trump, the 100s of arrests, the moral humiliation of the spectacle, the condemnation of the event by all, including Trumpites...that might actually force some Qs to quit the game
.@nhannahjones is the Galileo of the field of American history, no exaggeration
Has the rightwing never met an interesting idea? Their incuriosity and intellectual terror sometimes rival their racism
Anyone I have ever known in academia — humanities and sciences — would give anything to stress-test their field’s dominant paradigms as rigorously & imaginatively as Jones has.
It is a monumental achievement. The cries of dissent from towering American historians like Sean Wilentz are *proof* of what an visionary accomplishment the 1619 Project is. It has awoken the field “from its dogmatic slumbers” (as Hume said of Kant).