Some thoughts on yet another right wing online/media mob going after military service member:
1) Always important to identify the players and their history. Today's episode is brought Breitbart's Pentagon reporter, elevating the fellow who helped bring you Pizzagate and multiple other conspiracy theories, as well as has repeatedly elevated Russian info ops
2) We covered this sad player and the tactics in #LikeWar book.

Frankly, it is boring to me to see people still playing this game, as if we don't see through it now. What worked in 2016 doesn't now. Sorry.
3) And, as in all the old ops, part of the SOP is to identify and then try to leverage a new narrative you see trending, as a means to tap into that trend, but then elevate for your own purpose. Something everyone does from ISIS to Russia to politicians to ad firms. Still bored.
4) Culture/generational differences are a long standing cleavage to go after for any entity (a politician, a foreign government, a huckster attention seeker, etc.) seeking both to divide target and elevate themselves. Still bored, same old SOP.
5) Obviously, a generational debate is now playing out in US culture+politics. Everything from attitudes on LGBT to race etc. So here again, each of these are cleavage point that both foreign adversaries and domestic hucksters are going after.
6) So it is all the same, right? Wrong. Because there is a twist. The US military that both draws from and represents the nation is also going through that change, and thus becoming part of it too, both as a target and a leverage point.
For the foreign threat actors, this is no different, they've always seen it that way. Think Russian ops dating back to 1960s tumult in US. But for the new domestic actors, it requires a change in their own narrative/tactics.
7) That is, the change, and what is throwing so many people is the political flip in the narrative. For the last 2 generations, it was more often far left wing attacking+mocking the military (think Vietnam activists etc). Now, suddenly, it is the right wing.
Whether it is these online mobs going after service members like this Pizzagater/Breitbart stuff to Ted Cruz attacking young Army soldier right, for thanking her two moms for inspiring her, Trump's former NSC official Gorka calling pregnant USAF officer "disgusting" etc etc.
Whatever it is, in each episode, the US military member becomes a target, but they are really just a point of leverage to a larger goal that attacker has to tap into cultural debate/division and elevate themselves.
But, what makes it so hard for all to wrap their heads around is that now that attack on the military member is coming from the side of the political spectrum that for multiple generations has made a crucial part of their brand/identity to be "pro military."
IE, it is hard to imagine Reagan-era Republican proudly insulting a serving military member as part of a conscious tactic of self-elevation.

But it is not that era anymore.
8) That aspect is also what makes this all so troubling/confusing for the military members/leaders, as the part of our culture/media that just a few years back went to epic levels of adoration ( ...and a Toby Keith song plays in the background) is now seeking out ways to ding it.
While, in turn, the left media/culture/politics still hasn't made any kind of reverse pivot. IE, suddenly, they get hit by the right now, but you don't see AOC or Bernie or Huffpost etc wrapping themselves in military garb/culture
9) So what does this all mean?
A) the US military needs to expect more of these attacks on individual service members, unfortunately, from the same old foreign threat actors, but also a new set of domestic hucksters, and now politicians and media figures
B) as part that, it needs to develop better ways to identify these building attacks as they and support those targeted service members
C) institutions and networks beyond need to find ways to both support those targeted service members and also dissuade those domestic actors playing this game for their own gain
This is particularly the case for media on the military beat + defense analysts/writers: Understand the game and your own potential role in it.

And recognize that those who play this game are not your friends or even your peers. Do not do their work for them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peter W. Singer

Peter W. Singer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @peterwsinger

25 May
DHS Inspector General finds at least 348 cases where Trump forced migrant parents to leave the U.S. without their children
apnews.com/article/az-sta…

This directly confirms that Kirstjen Nielsen, now trying to cash in on her role at DHS with cyber $, was a liar.
Nielsen testified to Congress in December 2018 that “every parent” who was deported had a choice to take their child back to their country and those who did not “made the choice not to have the child accompany them.”
She also told Congress in March 2019 that there has been “no parent who has been deported, to my knowledge, without multiple opportunities to take their children with them.”
Read 4 tweets
23 May
"regrettable delay"

That is one way to describe a civilian airliner being forced down into authoritarian state territory by a Mig29, so that a passenger can be kidnapped...
Now, I get why the corporate comms team went as vanilla in tone as they could. This is an extraordinary situation in so many ways, meaning no PR team has a playbook for it. And it is really for govts to handle now (with some consequences for violating norms/laws), not an airline.
But @RyanairPress shouldn't also sugarcoat it. That rewards bad behavior and harms your own brand. Add in a line expressing concern about the unprecedented incident and the welfare of the passengers involved, including those taken off the flight.
Read 4 tweets
11 May
A challenge for national security wonks today that is akin to that in 2017.

Will you speak to real threats or dodge doing so for fear of "being partisan?"

Back then it was speaking to Russian cyber attack.

Today, it is viral conspiracy theory surrounding The Big Lie.
Today, I gave a speech on key trends in digital security. Covered issues Ransomware to IOT to viral mis/disinformation that can shape real world beliefs, actions and even cause deaths.

By including events of Jan6 and pandemic as case examples, however, was said to be partisan.
As an analyst, you have to include those case examples. To do otherwise is to dodge. But to include them is to make a certain segment of the audience uncomfortable or even angry. Many will thus avoid it...This is disservice to facts and your responsibility as an analyst.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
This message is 100% worth your watch and share, not just on Twitter, but Facebook etc


A message from a Republican leader and an iconic figure in our culture, who gets it, and maybe might pierce thru the fever dream too many fell into.
That is, please also share it with those co-workers, friends and family who don't realize the stakes of what is going on, and the near-miss to our democracy of what just played out.
In sifting thru video, I have seen not just the stupid things we all saw like the selfies and literally crapping on the floor. But people need to understand that there was also a harder, darker part...
Read 15 tweets
9 Jan
Some background to Twitter's reference to risk of further violence as one of reasons for suspension of Trump:
This is circulating among extremist accounts.
It made Trump's reversal of pledging "peaceful transition" in video to tweeting he wouldn't be in DC that date worrisome.
IE, preplanned Jan17 militia events mostly outside DC, but Jan20 noise is about retaliation in DC, martyrdom for the woman killed in Capitol, etc.
Trump breaking his pledge, and making it known he would Not be in the city, not taking part in peaceful transition, read significant
That is yet another reason why I don't have much empathy now for the tired "Let's just move on" narratives. Trump chose not to be part of a peaceful transition, and then doubled down yesterday, even AFTER the deaths and riot. That has all sorts of ripple effects.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jan
After all the jokes, my serious take:

By the numbers, no person in all of human history has shared a greater number of conspiracy theories with a greater number of people than Donald Trump did through social media.

This pipeline is now cut off, which is a "really big deal."
For our LikeWar book, I actually read every Trump tweet, going back to his first.

The sheer scale of not just the lies and insults in mindnumbing obviously, but he was also notable for just how many conspiracy theories he fed fire too long before presidency.
It hit topics from well known ones like his birtherism to other ones that are even more despicable now like aiding anti-vaxxers. Indeed, on that last one, my worry was that after Biden came in, he would pivot back to that theme, to stoke anger and bring attention back to himself
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(