Yes, at 3:10am YouTube informed us that the video was removed for “claims about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus”.
What I actually did was read from a new study on vaccination immunity vs. infection immunity, in the context of survey results.
...
What I actually did was read from a new study on vaccination immunity vs. infection immunity, in the context of survey results.
...
https://twitter.com/obamagarak/status/1402979685877780480
The study suggested that infected/recovered individuals have a greater immunity than vaccinated individuals, thus I raised the question of why anyone recovered would be pressured into vaccination.
Message: Best not think for yourselves, folks. It’s dangerous these days.
Message: Best not think for yourselves, folks. It’s dangerous these days.
The only other possible “violation of scientific consensus” would’ve been my comments over the lab leak vs. wet market.
If so, then I was unaware with nearly 70% of the country in agreement that, that lie was still the “scientific consensus”.
If so, then I was unaware with nearly 70% of the country in agreement that, that lie was still the “scientific consensus”.
And because I like to back up what I say (typically 😉), here's where that number comes from, which is brand new.
It's an incredible finding given the media/social media attempt to squash all those who questioned authority.
It's sadly still SW partisan, which is their fault.
It's an incredible finding given the media/social media attempt to squash all those who questioned authority.
It's sadly still SW partisan, which is their fault.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
