.@elizagriswold wrote a compelling NYer story about Mastriano, but the world he moves in has too much going on for one story to capture. Deception & denialism run rampant throughout. 1/13
But such denialism is absurd, @ndrewwhitehead, co-author of "Taking America Back For God" told me: 3/13
They want the benefits of claiming the fused Christian nationalist identity, while avoiding dealing with its shadow side: 4/13
They especially evade the fact that Chrisian nationalism is *harmful to Christianity*, as evangelical historian @JohnFea1 has argued: 5/13
But some Christian nationalists go much further. The "New Apostolic Reformation" (NAR) has been condemned as heretical by orthodox Pentecostals and others, and can be seen as a syncretic religion, incorporating elements of pagan "witchcraft": 6/13
The NAR intensifies the broader dynamic by which "extremists demonize secular scrutiny as a way of escaping orthodox religious scrutiny, while themselves claiming to embody true religious orthodoxy. It's a game of spiritual three-card monte." 7/13
These con-games to delegitimize any criticism are part of broader strategy under the rubric of "fourth generation warfare" (which has similarlities to Russian "hybrid warfare" which Mastriano has also written about): 8/13
The very elements that make the NAR so far from orthodox Christianity make it all the more suited for involvement in politics, as Katherine Steward, author of "The Power Worshippers" explained: 9/13
Mastriano fits snugly into this world, even as denies it--typical of those who dwell there. His brief political career can be better grasped by comparison with another state legislator's trajectory, described in a story co-authored by @FredClarkson: 10/13 religiondispatches.org/convergence-of…
And before his political career, Mastriano Mastriano's academic research into WWI Medal of Honor winner Sgt. Alvin York, was also apparently riddled with fraud, as the AP reported in March: 11/13 whyy.org/articles/in-fr…
Even the cover of his book on York has a photo he false claims shows prisoners captured by York. It was actually taken 13 days earlier, as shown by the date in the archives. 12/13 catalog.archives.gov/OpaAPI/media/5…
"You know who's not canceled? The endless parade of conservative pundits and politicians complaining about 'cancel culture.' You know who is canceled? George Floyd is canceled." Turn off the gaslight. #ConservativeCancelCulture is real. 1/12 salon.com/2021/05/01/con…
"Cancel culture" is a meaningless term, @mmfa editor @ParkerMolloy writes. But "For conservatives, that meaninglessness is a feature, not a bug," I note. "Those words mean whatever a right-wing accuser needs them to mean in the moment": 2/12 mediamatters.org/fox-news/woke-…
But there are two constraints on what "cancel culture" means: that it's new & comes only from the left. The truth is exactly the opposite: #ConservativeCancelCulture#gaslighting 3/12
Behind All The Hucksters, Liberalism is the True Conservatism: Liberalism delivers what conservatism falsely promises 1/11 salon.com/2021/03/27/can…
The ends conservatives hold out — preserving social order, local integrity, historical continuity, respect for authority, high levels of personal morality and religion's place as a polestar in people's lives — cannot be met by the means they insist on. 2/11
Conservative temperament and character traits are part of human nature, that should be thought of as gifts," as @dannagal told me: 3/11
Congress can wait: How Biden can reshape our future with executive action.
POTUS has enormous power to act based on existing laws. Rather than gnash our teeth over lost opportunities, let's focus on how much can be done, per @ddayen at @TheProspect: 1/6 salon.com/2020/11/29/con…
14 months ago, @ddayen at @TheProspect laid out the scope of what a Democratic POTUS could do without Congress, long before anyone else was thinking about it. Cancelling student debt was just the tip of the iceberg: 2/6 prospect.org/day-one-agenda…
This month, @jeffspross made an even deeper argument regarding long-term power to defeat Trumpism. It has 3 main parts: 1) The only way to defeat Trumpism is by repeated electoral victories ala the New Deal forcing the GOP to change. 3/6 prospect.org/day-one-agenda…
Feeling crazed? Want some distance? My author interview re "Conservatism: The Fight For A Tradition" explores a broader historical framework (2 centuries 4 countries) for understanding Trump: 1/10 salon.com/2020/10/24/how…
Conservatism is first a fight against the modern world, but also has an internal fight between those who accommodate to it ("liberal conservatives") & those who resist it (the "hard right") as well as specific historical factions. 2/10
Regarding the first fight, "What conservatives reckon they're resisting has changed as modern liberal life has changed". They fought both liberalism ("which lays out the feast") & democracy ("which draws up the guest list"): 3/10
Contra #NeverTrump narratives, Trump pushing US toward racial civil war has a *very* long history in white thought, which the right especially has nurtured, as @4GWDOTDOTDOT explores in a new report & discusses with me at @Salon: 1/9 salon.com/2020/09/26/beh…
As @philipplenz6 told me, "We need to be careful we don't get into a whack-a-mole game," but instead try "to find solutions that come from the bottom up, to think about how to change the system itself." Key problems are asymmetry of knowledge & intransparency: 3/10