In focusing on the security risks of #ClimateChange have we neglected to ask how conflicts affect emissions? Our new overview explores how the environmental and social changes that occur in war influence emissions, and why we need to track them ceobs.org/how-does-war-c… 🔽 1/7 Image
The direct emissions in conflict are the most obvious, for example attacks on oil infrastructure, or scorched earth policies. But we also see significant changes to land use that have a major bearing on whether areas store or release carbon. 2/7 Image
Peace can also generate emissions, we almost always see spikes in deforestation, and we need to factor in the emissions costs of managing conflict debris and of reconstruction. Conflicts impede environmental governance, which also has a bearing on emissions. 3/7 #EWIPA Image
Fairly straightforward so far. But conflicts also lock countries in to polluting technologies, or increase some pollution sources. Gas flaring from oil fields is a great example. Yemen could meet it's Paris obligations several times over if it stopped flaring. 4/7 Image
We need to get on top of this stuff but the standard emissions directories don't capture everything we need them to, like land cover changes, fires, or biogenic emissions, or those locked in industrial emissions. 5/7 Image
We usually think about the human or economic costs of war but with better methodologies we could also factor in the climatic costs of war. Military emissions are important but not the whole story. ceobs.org/governments-mu… 6/7
Conflicts create opportunities to build back greener, or to encourage sustainable transitions in energy production, land use or urban development. Understanding how any given conflict has created increased carbon emissions or degraded carbon sinks would greatly help with this. X
You can read the overview here, even we were surprised at how little research has been done on the relationship between conflicts and emissions, and we hope this might encourage others to also take a look. ceobs.org/how-does-war-c… #ClimateCrisis

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Conflict and Environment Observatory (CEOBS)

Conflict and Environment Observatory (CEOBS) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @detoxconflict

16 Jun
#Military emissions make a significant contribution to #ClimateChange, our new blog explores why this is and what needs to change. A lack of transparency means we don't know how large their contribution is but we do have some stats⬇️ ceobs.org/the-militarys-… #ClimateAction 1/6 Image
Global military expenditure rose to almost US$2 trillion in 2020, this is important for military emissions because a large proportion are indirect and come through supply chains and lifecycle costs. Here's a chart. It's really not all about emissions from engines. 2/6 Image
Which isn't to say that engines don't matter. As of 2021 the global #military aircraft fleet is 53,563, which is double the projected civilian fleet (23,715). But because the military don't report where they fly and how much fuel they use we don't know what it contributes. 3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(