If you have brought a human into the world without explaining your excuse to them very clearly (and by the way, they don't have to agree that it was a good idea), then...
...you shouldn't wonder why at the age of 10 they are being noncompliant to your list of daily and weekly chores or any other expectation you have of them, for that matter.
You can't just say daft things like, "If you don't bath, you will stink," or, "You must do your homework if you want to have a job one day, young lady!"
There are too many assumptions built into these glibly communicated consequences.
Children are not obliged to accept YOUR reason for breeding them as THEIR reason for continuing to live either.
And they are deffffffinitely not obliged to be grateful to you for having procreated or for having fed them and changed their nappies.
People are very concerned that their child should be 'independent' and 'contribute to the economy'. And although those words are abjectly oversimplified, I get why in the current dispensation it is useful for the majority of people to be able to work for their own money, but...
Surely you didn't breed the kid for that? Who ever said, "I didn't use contraception, because I wanted to contribute a human workunit to the economy"?
OK, some Nazis and the like possibly said something to that effect, but I don't think that kind of reasoning is mainstream.
When you bring people into the world without their consent, you had better give them a lot of support and choices to compensate for your decision.
A few months ago, some antinatalist ran a series of Twitter polls asking how people would prefer for their kid to die one day. Like: suicide, cancer, car accident, starvation, old age after prolonged dementia, execution as a martyr... I can't remember them all.
Although this was rather grim, I thought it was actually quite a good question, because we're all gonna die, and if it matters to you how people die, you should probably prepare them for your preferred form of death, even though fortune may deal them some other sideways blow.
OK, I'm gonna pause there to first consider how to put a content warning on the next bit about Karel Schoeman who chose to die and Gafsa Bux who chose to live, and my friend who is being denied a DNR and another friend who's had a DNR forced on her.
Lemme just put this here for now, because I think that the disabled opponents of assisted suicice don't get nearly as much attention as the nondisabled people in favour of it. notdeadyet.org
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm doing an emergency fundraiser for @crippledcommie. If you donate $75 or more, I'll compose a song for you using your lyrics or you can tell me more or less what it should say and I will write the words. This is my piano. An example of a song which I composed follows below.
I'll provide an audio-only version of your song as a sound file. If you prefer something instrumental only, that's fine too.
Here is an example of a song which I composed. Ignore the low-res pic, this is just to give you an idea of the music.
You'll find the lyrics of that song below it on YouTube.
Friends, everybody, Americans and others with strong currency, can you PLEASE donate ASAP? This is desperate. People with communication disabilities are among the most vulnerable people in our community.
Please donate here. At our exchange rate, it would take me YEARS to earn this money, but if 100 Americans give $40 each, this will work. Please help out.
"Their parents kept them locked in their room at night for years and years, boarding up the windows, removing the lights from inside, taking away everything but their bed, and all without a sanitary way to relieve themself, for up to about 12 hours at a time."
With the right supports for the various communication disabilities in autism, we could have a lot of nonspeaking autistic people communicating. Here's a thread with approx. 100 nonspeakers who have something to say.
[THREAD] I am going to start curating resources for an Autistic Strategies Network course for autism professionals.
There is an abject shortage of schools for autistic children in my country πΏπ¦, but simply replicating what's already out there will not meet the need. We have to fix up what's currently broken. This course would be part of that, but it's not the whole solution.
The course will be constructed largely around publicly available artefacts, and one of the key learning mechanisms will be exegesis, or, more simply, comprehension tests.
[THREAD]
If you are teaching autistic children, you must not teach them an oversimplified lie like that if someone smiles, it means they are happy. If you do, you're basically gaslighting them.
You can teach them that smiling is often a sign that someone may be happy.
You can also say that the smiley emoticon is used to indicate that someone is pleased with something.
If you are going to try to make them smile for the camera or smile when greeting people, you really need to sort out the rationale for those things in your own head before you embark on such a mission.