It’s amazing the lengths “disinfo reporters” will go to misinform and misdirect the public’s understanding of a topic.

Exhibit A: NBC’s disinfo reporters defining “Critical Race Theory” as simply “the academic study of racism’s pervasive impact.”

lol
I mean, “lessons on systemic racism” is a hilarious inaccurate summary of “critical race theory”

To call it euphemistic would be to give it too much credit even.
They continuously package this ideology in the most benign terms possible. Do they even care about conveying the truth? Not at all. The main goal here is to discredit the resistance.
There’s this stupefyingly benign-sounding code reporters supportive of CRT are basically required to use and OH LOOK here’s some more of it in NBC’s piece
What the fuck is an “equity program” and what do “inclusive policies” actually look like in practice? I’m still reading the piece, but my guess is NBC’s disinfo reporters make no attempt to actually explain what these things are in practical terms.
More benign code stated flatly so as to ease the pill of a divisive and destructive worldview. What do these lessons look like? We have no idea. NBC dutifully short on details and high on coded mantras.
One thing I see continuously in pro-CRT journalism is the idea that the choice is between CRT and not teaching about racism or slavery at all.

It’s a false choice, but here NBC plays its role. Republicans just want to ban “discussion of race in America.”
See here? It’s just a given to NBC that CRT is just “systems to combat racism” … and the reason it HAS to be a given is because the resistance to it has to be painted as racist itself.

(Meanwhile, never mind what these “systems” actually are … we won’t hear in detail.)
But kudos to actually linking to it, NBC, one of these systems are BRT’s

And what are BRT’s? Deputized groups of youths who police thought on campuses!! Where have we seen this idea before in history?
^^^ this illiberal, regressive nonsense is what NBC refers to flatly in copy as “systems to combat racism”

Let that sink in as you read this piece. They are not interested in accurately conveying reality. They exist explicitly to annihilate the perceived opposition.
What is this coded bullshit, an “affinity space for people of color”?

Can you imagine referring to segregated lunch counters as “affinity spaces”?

Say what it is, it’s racially segregated.

Also they “pledged to dismantle racism” — which sounds great — but we don’t hear how
What are these “far right causes”? They sound so scary. If they’re “far,” they must be.

Uhhh, reopening schools, children wearing masks and racially divisive pedagogy.

Lmao, this is a joke
I’m not going to finish this piece, it’s obviously pro CRT propaganda dressed up like journalism, but I will point out two more things.

They gloss over this “anti-discrimination” res, but really, read into it. It’s objectively got its roots in CRT and gender theory
And of course where would we be without the old marxist trope that people resisting marxism can’t really “define it”
Here’s a pretty good thread on this nonsense.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Geoffrey Ingersoll

Geoffrey Ingersoll Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GPIngersoll

15 Jun
The other fascinating thing is that Colbert and other higher primates that vote democrat and swaddle themselves in “science,” basically most of the press, keep using the “where’s the evidence” refrain.

It’s willfully ignorant because:
A. There’s only ever really been circumstantial evidence for either theory

And

B. The circumstantial evidence for zoonotic is SUBSTANTIALLY weaker.

It basically consists of Pope Fauci saying it’s historically more likely, which is …. True, but not a good way to close the book
For example: Say we have a lab like that in NC. Say a global pandemic gets its start right next to that lab in NC. Say the researchers there bragged about altering viruses. Say the virus tracked most closely to those found in hedgehogs in Illinois AND researchers also bragged
Read 5 tweets
12 Jun
I keep seeing this assertion that conservatives don’t know what critical race theory is, and it’s flat out wrong.
For a little more than a year, the proponents of this destructive ideology have been rebranding it “diversity training,” and when conservatives called bullshit and somewhat successfully started identifying it in pedagogy and policy, the new line is they don’t know what it is.
Ofc someone asked me to explain it, and so I did. It’s not a very difficult concept to summarize.
Read 14 tweets
3 Jun
1. To demonstrate my own, as an example, the first conversation about gain of function I had was May 1, 2020. It led me down a month's long rabbit hole researching highly technical papers. Sometimes it took me a week or more to read and fully understand 10 pages.
I did not actually pitch a story on it until first week of Jan.

I would love to say I was ahead of everyone. I wasn't. We did some reporting on lab leak, but we didn't get really aggressive on it until recently.

A lot of that is my fault. I was trepidatious.
I didn't fully understand. My assumptions about how the research worked turned out to be true, but I didn't truly understand.

Sure as shit didn't help matters that NO ONE in the field was willing to talk about it. One or two, I understand, but dozens of emails going unanswered.
Read 4 tweets
3 Jun
Reading the Vanity Fair story and a bunch of things jump out at me just concerning the mythology of early 2020.

Many in establishment and corporate media have been blaming Trump for their own efforts to suppress lab leak hypothesis.

It’s odd. It reads like TDS.
Do your fucking brains shut off when Trump talks? Does the sound of his voice negate all ability to reason?

Trump’s “racism” in this case was just a reactionary response to wider media and elite institutions adopting Pro China postures and Chinese propaganda wholesale.
When every major institution is saying, you’re not allowed to say the virus came from China because it’s racist — within earshot of Chinese operatives saying the exact same thing — well obviously Donald Trump of all people is going to call it “China virus.”

The response here …
Read 18 tweets
2 Jun
1. A decent amount of people were confused about this tweet yesterday, so I’ll explain:

It’s late 2016. Obama is still in office. The IC, Democrats, and the media are fairly determined to investigate Trump criminally, to build a case based on innuendo, selective leaks, and lies.
2. The case is that Don Trump teamed up with Vlad Putin to hack Podesta and the DNC’s emails and then leak them strategically in order to win the election for Trump, all while managing to avoid the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus mankind has ever known. (The NSA et al)
3. I know, it’s absurd on its face. Trump is smart, but he is not a Bond villain.

In any case, as a result, Trump camp has declared war on the Deep State. His chosen horseman for that war: Mike Flynn.

Yes, it is Flynn who will protect and guide Trump as he plumbs the Deep State
Read 11 tweets
1 Jun
Take notes, everyone, this is how political stratcom operatives use media for damage control ...

cnn.com/2021/06/01/pol…
Command messaging high up in the story, probably almost word for word what the Harris team wanted to convey.

I wonder if Biden gave her clearance for this or if her office is freelancing
lol, nothing quite like being on deep background ("sources") to praise your boss.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(