What kind of impact will the Australia-UK trade deal have? Short answer is we don’t know, in part because we still have scant detail abt it, in part cos it generally takes a LONG time for these deals to be felt in our lives.
Even so, I think this is a big deal, for a few reasons:
The first thing to remember is the historical context. There are two lazy assumptions knocking around: 1. That the UK could never trade much with Aus given how far away it is and 2. Our trade with them really collapsed when we joined the EU and started imposing their tariffs…
Actually look at Australian trade as % of UK total, it’s clear it used to be REALLY high. Yes, this was partly because of war and partly because it was part of the sterling zone, thus locked into UK economy. But even in ‘50s/60s Aus accounted for 1 in 8 of all imports/exports
Second, while UK-AUS trade has certainly dropped in recent decades, it’s clear that the decline started long before the UK joined the EU and imposed higher tariffs on Australian imports. So simply removing those tariffs won’t necessarily reverse all this decline
Nonetheless, the removal of agricultural tariffs could be a really big deal. And while govt insists this will happen gradually over 15 years to protect UK farmers, the details of the detail divulged by the Australians earlier today suggest otherwise…
Consider: here are 2019 beef/sheepmeat imports from Australia. The yellow lines show you the current quotas, above which restrictions on trade kick in. Quite low, right? But now have a look at what happens the minute the trade deal is signed…
When the deal is signed those quotas are catapulted dramatically higher (SEVEN times higher in the case of beef imports). This is not gradual. It’s a very sudden and sharp shift which *may* be reflected in an influx of beef imports, which could put British farmers out of business
I say *may* because while those quotas are sharply higher than before, it’s worth noting that at present Australia doesn’t exceed those much lower quotas. Ozzie farmers seem to be quite happy focusing on lucrative Asian markets. So not a given they flip to UK overnight.
But the other point here is that this deal represents a serious policy shift, which it’s worth reflecting on. Only a couple of years ago farmers were protected by EU subsidies and trade barriers. One big question upon leaving the EU was what would happen to farmers. Now we know…
UK seems (and I say seems because alas @tradegovuk has yet to release much detail and this is based on what we’re getting from the Australians) to be removing those barriers abruptly, not gradually. UK food standards will be protected (eg no hormone-fed beef), but not farmers.
However, in return for these concessions, the UK seems to have negotiated something genuinely special. UK citizens will get more access to the Australian labour market. The frankly outdated stipulation of having to do agricultural work in exchange for a visa is out.
Given Australia is among the world’s most hawkish countries when it comes to immigration policy, getting this in the deal is no mean feat. No other country save NZ has anything similar. It goes 2 ways, of course: it’ll be easier for Aus citizens to work in UK too…
So yes, both parts of this deal are important and, while they won’t be felt overnight they are bound to have an impact on our lives in the coming years. Esp farmers and under-35s who want to travel and work in Australia.
Contrary to what you might hear on this platform, trade deals are rarely “won” or “lost”. As far as I can make out, that’s the case here too. Whether you feel UK has done well/badly prob depends on how you feel about agricultural subsidies, food policy and freedom of movement.
But there is a deeper issue. I don’t think we as a nation have done enough talking about what kind of a country we want to be. Did those voting for Brexit believe that would imply the removal of protections for their farmers? Maybe. Then again most farmers voted to leave
What is our farming policy? What is our food policy? The reality is we have only begun to have that conversation. DEFRA’s recent policy positions on this have been open-ended and inconclusive. gov.uk/government/pub…
Reality is, like it or not, we DO now have the beginnings of a radically different agricultural policy, except it’s being written not by DEFRA but by the Dept for International Trade. Without much, if any, debate in Parliament. This seems like an odd way of going about things
Trade policy is, frankly, boring. Lots of abstruse numbers and jargon. Not much tangible impact for years. But don't be fooled. The UK-Australia trade agreement is a really big deal for all of us. Here's why: news.sky.com/story/why-the-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Conway

Ed Conway Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EdConwaySky

14 Jun
There we have it. According to @borisjohnson the UK hasn’t passed the four tests laid out in Feb when the reopening timetable was announced.
A pretty clear pass on tests one and two (vaccines) and a pretty clear fail on test four (variants). Test three unclear.
Reopening delayed.
Here’s the q: what changed between the PM saying 12 days ago that he could see “nothing in the data” to change re-opening timetable and today?
Variant growth rate v similar.
Case growth rate v similar.
Not sure there’s any data we have now that we didn’t on June 2.
What changed?
The point of basing policy on DATA is that you actually follow the data.
Better still, you make it clear what levels of data will trigger what kind of action.
Why? That kind of transparency means people can use that data to plan their lives rather than hoping for leaks from No10
Read 6 tweets
6 Jun
"I don't recognise those figures".
This is odd given the figs @TrevorPTweets quoted to @MattHancock are govt's own figs from its NHS Test & Trace spreadsheets. They show it waited far longer to put India on the red list than Pakistan after its Covid positivity hit a certain level
Let me take you (& @matthancock) through it.
This may seem like water under the bridge but it MATTERS because:
1 we now have more of this Delta/Indian variant than almost any other country outside Asia
2 we still have little clarity on how govt decides on red/amber/green lists
It's worth saying at the outset that @MattHancock is absolutely right about one thing: when taking these decisions it's far better to focus on data collected through our testing system on incoming travellers than data you get from, for instance @OurWorldInData. So let's do that.
Read 12 tweets
5 Jun
Breaking: G7 has now agreed a deal on tackling corporate tax avoidance by the tech giants. "It's a proud moment" says Chancellor @RishiSunak. More on @skynews soon
Full details to come in a communique soon but my understanding of main points:
1: new tax rules for firms with 10pc profit margins. Above that, 20pc of profits to be reallocated based on a formula involving sales. Will affect abt 100 firms.
2: global minimum corp tax rate of 15%
While the deal is certainly less ambitious than many wanted (eg 15% not 21%, only 100 companies covered by new rules) there’s no disputing this is a big moment. Global biz tax rules date back a century to the League of Nations. This is the most meaningful step to reform them yet
Read 6 tweets
27 May
New: G7 insiders are now expecting a breakthrough on a global minimum corporate tax rate at next week’s finance minister’s meeting in London. Full story: news.sky.com/story/global-t…
There’s been lots of movement behind the scenes on this.
Last wk the working plan was the summit would mostly be about climate change.
Now TAX is likely to dominate.
And G7 insiders say a deal in London is “doable”. Which in turn wld make a G20/OECD deal later this yr more likely
This is big stuff.
Biggest overhaul of tax rules in a century.
But there’s ongoing negotiation between sherpas abt which companies would be affected and how the two “pillars” of this (1. changing how we calculate what taxes are owed where, 2. Global minimum rate) interact.
Read 6 tweets
25 May
Exclusive: Big blow for Joe Biden as Irish finance minister tells me he has “significant concerns” with US proposals for global minimum corporate tax rate:
•No plans to change Ireland’s 12.5% rate.
•Expects it to be in place in 5/10 yrs time.
Story here: news.sky.com/story/ireland-…
Irish finmin tells @skynews:
- “sig reservations” abt Biden tax plans
- “proud of the part the 12.5% tax rate has played in our econ development”
- N Ireland protocol helped secure “the long term interests of the island [of Ireland], but “there are issues”
These comments from @Paschald represent the strongest reproach yet to the US president, who is seeking to persuade countries around the world to agree to a floor on corporate tax rates of 15% - the biggest potential reform to international biz taxes in a century.
Read 16 tweets
25 May
If we do eventually discover that #Covid19 was indeed something which came from a Chinese laboratory rather than naturally jumping from animals to humans, I think much of the media/establishment will need to think long and hard about how it got this so wrong.
The problem isn’t just what @TomChivers calls “seeing the smoke” vs “reading the room”
It’s not just about interventions
It’s about a kind of mob mentality where we convert the conventional wisdom into a tablet of stone which we then bash over the head of anyone who disagrees
It’s about the fact that when curious people attempted to investigate or cover the lab escape theory - like @mattwridley or @Ianbirrell - they were derided as conspiracy theorists.
Social networks removed their posts, citing fact check sites which didn’t know the answer either.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(