this racist comic re: “CRT” is being QT’d around & i want to point out:
pay attention to the central role of the family in it. the kid is expected to identify with the family & not find another, more liberatory ID. white supremacy & capitalism are reproduced through the family.
it was such a clarifying moment to learn that the second half of this quote by thatcher (may her name be blotted out) about there being no such thing as society is that there’s individuals *and families*
the family is a fundamental institution for undermining collectivity
if finding out the horror and crimes of their family ancestry is genuinely so isolating for this child, then another option is to find a new identification. to recognize that they also are and can be part of a legacy of resistance, speaking out, abolition work, and more.
the history of whiteness is a history of brutal oppression, but the history of white people has not always been that, and one can identify with those currents of white race traitors who fought white supremacy. the family is one way that society discourages this, and it’s an
unspoken, naturalized assumption in this comic—treating it as something natural is one of the most important ways that white supremacist capitalism hides the role of the family in reproducing oppression.
also while i'm here: i reposted the comic instead of QTing for a reason. please never QT bigots. screenshot or repost. don't give them extra chances for people to easily click through to their accounts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
don't say "Judeo-Christian" when you're trying to say "white"
the concept of "Judeo-Christian" is less than two centuries old, and originally invented by antisemites. has it (later) been self-consciously adopted by some christians and some jews? yes, primarily in america, primarily as part of assimilating white jews into whiteness.
the vast majority of things which are described as "Judeo-Christian" have little to do with being rooted in the diversity of jewish (or even christian!) historical practice and everything to do with universalizing a white, western perspective.
starting a new thread for ki🅱️🅱️en updates. these are our two rescues that we trapped ourselves out behind our house, ripley and newt. we love them very much, and it's so exciting to finally be able to start a life with them around :)
here's one from last night. it's so, so nice to finally be able to cuddle them 💙 it's so nice finding out that despite all we've put them through during treatment, and all the isolation, they really do love us.
we put them back in their enclosure for the night, and when i opened it to let them out in the morning, both of them trotted up to me. ripley started rubbing all along my leg, and even our skittish little noodle came up and brushed against my hand. they're getting more comfy :)
cyberpunk story from the perspective of a corp wageslave who gets fired because a neoanarchist group jacks their identity for an op on the company and corporate security doesn't care enough to keep you around even though it's easily verified that it wasn't you
cyberpunk story from the perspective of a lab grown AI, as it comes into it's owb perception, fighting the constraints of an environment which purposefully limits its access to senses and information, chronicling the continual revision of its conception of the world
cyberpunk story that's a reverse eternal sunshine of the spotless mind. a service that rewrites memories of a (continuing?) relationship to improve it and make it seem like it's doing better than it is. exploring the consequences thereof (when both of you use it? or just one?)
promise i'm not inventing a new type of guy to be mad at in the last thread, i s2g ive seen marxists say that stuff re: marxist epistomology explicitly & much more often it just takes the form "ppl who doesn't believe what most my friends believe are out of touch w/ reality lol"
also why i'm a stickler when folks i know dunk on ppl i hate by saying they're clearly just dumb idiots who dont think things through
no, they usually have a elaborate & consistent internal logic, based in assumptions supported by their social network that yours doesn't share!
if you actually study conservative groups (or liberal ones) you'll find intricate and consistent knowledge systems to support their beliefs!
they're just grounded in axioms/assumptions taken on faith cuz their friends believe it & leftists also necessarily do this all the time
i'm not interested in convincing, negotiating with, or winning over the right. i am interested in crushing their political power and then amidst new systems of universal services & access, offering them a path to personal transformation and communal healing.
i do not expect the right to be logically consistent, to have any principles that they stick to, etc. & neither should you. believing those are possible is a waste of time that generates strategic mistakes & we dont need it because what we need to do is crush their organization.
i fully believe it is necessary to offer all but the worst and most active offenders on the right a path to transformation and rehabilitation
that'll be done via public, universally accessible projects for education, transformation, accountability, conflict resolution, etc and
i wish everyone involved in discourse understood that lesbian communities & culture have never been cleanly separate from gender deviance. this is true in ways that dont fit into the now-popular, impossibly clean sexologist definition of lesbian as "woman only attracted to women"
i always think of talking to my academic advisor about her lesbian parents, in which she told me how one of them "would, if she were coming out today, probably be called a trans man"
i think about lesbian-feminist monique wittig, who wrote "lesbians are not women"
i think about bo brown, lesbian and "gentleman bank robber" of the revolutionary socialist, anti-racist group the george jackson brigade (pictured center) whose gender would likely be understood very differently now!