A brief #energytwitter nerd thread. As usual, about things people aren't talking about but should be. Who should be allowed to own and profit from retail EV charging stations?
1/ That may seem a dumb question. We have a market economy, if people want this businesses will build it, right? Not so fast.
2/ Because for all the deregulation we've done of our electric markets over the past 3 decades, the "last mile" that connects to retail use is still a regulated monopoly in all 50 states.
3/ There's good reason for that - society isn't improved by having 10 wires into every home with consumers flipping between each to pick their favorite supply. But the build out of EV charging raises hard questions about that structure.
4/ Specifically, if you are not the regulated, last-mile utility, should you be allowed to sell electricity to retail customers, at a profit? In ~ a dozen states, the answer is no.
5/ That leads to stories like this one, where gasoline and convenience store operators can't find the economic logic to convert their gasoline pumps into electricity pumps. cbsnews.com/news/electric-…
6/ If that remains, then we aren't going to get the charging stations we need. Not because they don't make inherent economic sense, but because century-old, monopolistic utility regulations don't reward free market actors.
7/ That's fundamentally solvable; regulated utilities make money by investing capital that can be built into their rate base and gas stations make money by marking up gasoline & beef jerky. So fix the state-level rules and let both do what they know how to do.
8/ But that's not enough. Because that presumes that the only way to sell electricity to EVs is through existing fueling stations. What about parking garages? Government-owned rest areas? Shopping mall owners?
9/ All of those players (and more) have real estate that could be put to work, but attracting capital to build the infrastructure will require fixing out-dated utility laws. Our challenge is to figure out how to do that in a way that lets a thousand entrepreneurial flowers bloom.
10/ So why should you care? Because losers cry louder than winners cheer. Vested interests know how much they have to lose if they can't participate in these markets. They are (and should) be active in the policy convos we are having about this right now.
11/ But if we do this right, we will create opportunities for a whole lot of entrepreneurs who don't yet exist to bring their own capital and innovation to this space. We will all benefit from their innovation... but since they don't yet exist, they aren't at the table.
12/ My favorite part of this job is figuring out who isn't at that proverbial table and making sure they aren't forgotten. We haven't found the solution just yet, but let us know if you have good ideas! And watch this space. /fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Casten

Sean Casten Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCasten

24 Jun
I continue to think LCOE is a lousy metric to understand the power sector. But when all-in costs for clean energy are lower than marginal costs for dirty energy, it's a big deal.
This is why I've been so focused on getting our financial regulators to start planning for the massive wealth transfers that are coming to our financial system. casten.house.gov/media/press-re…
The *physical* financial risks caused by climate change (property loss, crop failures, etc) are frightening but understandable. But in the near term, the *transition* risks may be bigger.
Read 9 tweets
9 Jun
As a general rule, I love @drvolts stuff on our energy system and almost always learn from him. But I have to quibble with this one that - like most LCOE pieces conflates capex & opex. Short thread: #energytwitter
1/ My view is that for any energy storage system *once built* the only thing that really matters is round-trip efficiency (e.g., how much electricity you get out / how much you put in). For most battery systems it's around 80%.
2/ That means that you will run that asset as long as the price you get from selling the electricity is >= 1/0.8 = 1.25x the price you paid to buy the electricity. Above that point you will make marginal money and knock any more expensive source off the grid.
Read 12 tweets
2 Jun
Prairie State is being EXTREMELY disingenuous here. Coal-fired power is neither cheap nor clean. Their statement here suggests to the contrary and needs clarification. #energytwitter #nerdthread wbez.org/stories/pritzk…
1/ Backstory: IL state regulators are in the midst of negotiations to try and shut down high CO2 power sources like Prairie State. Those negotiations are still on-going and have no federal nexus. But their statement is made within that context.
2/ The plant has been a boondoggle since it was built. Over-budget, over-schedule and consistently forcing users to pay way more for electricity than they would have otherwise. See here for details: rmi.org/insight/transi…
Read 12 tweets
31 May
A few thoughts on this Memorial Day about patriotism. From the speech I gave this morning in Glen Ellyn here, but in a condensed thread here for you Twitter-philes.
m.facebook.com/castenforcongr…
1/ Memorial Day is a holiday that more than any other, forces us to think about what it means to be patriotic.
2/ First because of it's history. In 1865 African Americans in Charleston SC held the first remembrance of those they lost. A year later, white women in Columbus MS did the same to honor Confederates. The national holiday honoring all war dead didn't come until 1971.
Read 15 tweets
28 May
I'm proud to represent #IL06, the district once represented by Henry Hyde. And I'm delighted to see @POTUS proposing a budget that finally gets rid of my predecessor's anti-choice legacy. politico.com/news/2021/05/2…
1/ The data is unambiguous: reducing access to abortions doesn't reduce the incidence of abortions. It just reduces their safety. Take away the access to safe procedures and women die.
2/ The Hyde Amendment, therefore has the practical effect only of compromising the health of lower income women who depend on government-provided healthcare. It is evil and inhumane.
Read 5 tweets
27 May
For those curious about why I've been saying that @FERC is key to reaching our climate goals - read this. canarymedia.com/articles/lbnls…
Enough clean gen in the queue to get half way to a zero-carbon grid (e.g., developers want to build them) but held back by delays in grid-interconnection rules.
If we want clean energy... if we want cheap energy, we have to fix the barriers imposed by a system and governance process that is overwhelmingly biased to preserve the status quo.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(