What is the 'federalist principle' ? Do you guys want a Supreme Court? "India is a Union of States" is a gramatical formation. can you say "India is a Centre of States".. the real messaging is in Tamil communicated by other #D , which yall dont understand.
Most Indians are not curious people. Why is a mere word substitution such a big issue? Who cares.. if you use one synonym or another? I certainly dont care Tomaato Tomatoe..
So there is something else there innit.. the next step requires 'curiosity'..
The gentlemen on left is Constantine Ravindran spokesperson of DMK - 'if 30 states secede then there is no India" .. another thing in #DravidianTamil they arent using the word "India" even in normal context they are using "Union of India"
-- well that is an odd thing to say at a bare minimum right? so Why should a Garhwal Regiment die on the border for you? You can also see Modi/Shah are totally out of their elements dealing with #D ..
This one is a major handle in #D ecosystem.
Notice how #Dravidians have "Brahminized" the issue with these memes.. a very careful play. @vikramhegde (let me know if you want untagged..)
Few Brahmins discussing:
They are saying India is union of states
We should tell Avaal (slang TB) from India only states have come Oy (slang TB)
Who is Iron Patel
He is one who integrated 500 kingdoms
See I made you say the answer..
This "Sambaashanai" (a fictional dialog) way of propaganda is as old as #Dravidian itself. Kuthoosi Gurusamy was an expert in this. ChittiraPuthiran was another (they claim he was Periyar pseudonym, I doubt it) it always features TBrahmins talking to each other overheard by #D
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"TBrahmin women are learning Bharatanatyam dance as a scheme to entertain and take the money of Chettiars (Nattukottai Nagarathars)"
12-6-1948 Kudiarasu: Official paper of #Dravidians titled "எல்லாம் பார்ப்பனமயம் ஜகத்"
You all think I am trying haard to find these. Not at all. This is their entire literature. There is nothing else! I can just pick any book/periodical and find this! A cauldron of hatred - to demonize and defame the Tamil Brahmin people.
This is where "Brahmin"Ism will get you @ChetanAhimsa .. no one supports oppression. But only a coward or a deep actor like TNM will support tagging this to an identifiable group.
The title says "Quick Di.. here have sweets"..dialog starts.. come here, quick run, have sweets, have you heard the good news. Gandhi has been shot.. .."
Now this isnt a legal issue .. as Sartre said, this isnt like an 'opinion that needs to be protected by free speech' .. it is a criminal passion. Are you legally allowed to have this type of fantasy about a group?
A psychosis of the #DravidianTamil
Here is a very useful book for those wishing to do deep dive into Tamil - a necessary capability. I skimmed it and found it **remarkably good**. Journal of Kumbakonam Advaita Sabha Golden Jubilee 1944. Book is here
Dedicated to analysis of vedic/vedantic continuum of Tamizh works. A bit deep for me, but I skimmed and got a medium-res view. Remarkable publication covers ALL tamil works.
Very very interesting confirmation for me. Kings India connect with Dravidian outfit @louisetillin .. way way outside capability of any other regional outfit like RJD,TMC,NCP,JDS.. different level.
திராவிட நாட்டில் "ஸ்ரீரங்கத்தையும் சிதம்பரத்தையும் பீரங்கி வைத்துத் தகர்ப்போம்.." இது பல மேடைகளில் வெவ்வேறு வடிவங்களில் நாம் கேட்டதே. இதன் மூலம் எங்கிருக்கிறது? வரிகளை இயற்றியவர் பாரதிதாசன் தான் என்று தமிழர் அறிவர்.இது உண்மைதானா? 1/
முதலில் இதுப் போன்ற வன்ம வரிகள் யார் எழுதினாலும் குற்றமே. பொது மேடைகளில் பகிரங்கமாக இப்படிக் குற்றச்செயல் ஊக்குவிக்கும் முழக்கம் எழுப்புவது திராவிடத்தின் தனிச் சிறப்பு.
பாரதிதாசன் இவ்வரிகளை எழுதவில்லை என்றால் வேறு யார் எழுதினார்கள்? இக்கட்டுரை படி இன்னொரு திராவிட முன்னோடி கவிஞர் "வீறுகவியரசர்" முடியரசன் தான் இப்புகழுக்குச் சொந்தக்காரர் என்று சான்றுகள் அளித்திருக்கிறது.siragu.com/%E0%AE%AA%E0%A…
see? This is called 'defamiliarizing' and 'problematizing' - tools from critical methods.
I think the semantics of 'central' are established and well understood and there are no functional implications of 'union'. This is akin to throwing sand into the gears. #D for disruption