THREAD: John’s #Passion #Narrative

SUB-TITLE: The Fall in Reverse

A garden, a tree, some thorns, some guards, angels, weapons, and flames.

What passage of Scripture do these things bring to mind? Genesis 2–3, right?

It’s *a* valid answer. But it’s not the only one.
John’s passion narrative involves all of these things,

and its use of them is highly instructive, as we’ll see below.
Like all masterpieces, John’s passion narrative works at multiple levels.

For a start, it can be read it as a historical narrative and subjected to critical scrutiny.

And, when that’s done, it fares pretty well.
As Bart Ehrman (@BartEhrman) says,

John’s central claims about Jesus as a historical figure—a Jew, with followers, executed on orders of the Roman governor of Judea, Pontius Pilate—are confirmed by non-Christian sources.
Furthermore:
John’s narrative outlines a plausible sequence of events.

Jesus is a threat to Jerusalem’s leaders, who are desperate to get rid of him,

but, since they don’t want to execute Jesus themselves (and can’t legally do so anyway), they get Pilate to do their dirty work for them...
...or at least they try, at which point several complications ensure.
Pilate’s behaviour is plausible too.

He can’t work out what Jesus is supposed to have done wrong and is loath to be strung along by the Jews.

Consequently, Pilate pronounces Jesus innocent (since, whatever his crimes are, he is clearly no threat to Rome),...
...which prompts Jerusalem’s leaders to mobilise ‘the mob’.

And so, anxious to avoid civil unrest, Pilate capitulates,

and Jesus is led away to be executed.
John’s passion thus makes sense as a historical narrative, and is a highly instructive one.

It reveals some of the problems with weak leadership,

the dangers of envy,

and the beauty of those who remain true to their convictions (even in the face of death).
Such considerations, however, are only the tip of the iceberg.

Beneath the surface of John’s narrative are multiple theological narratives,

each of which highlights a different aspect of the significance of what takes place on the cross.
For a start, John’s narrative raises political questions.
If Jesus is a king, then what kind of king is he?

Where is his kingdom?

How does Pilate’s ‘power from above’ fit into it?

And how can a kingdom prosper when its king is so ready to serve, not to mention surrender his life?
At the same time, John’s passion is laden with sacrificial imagery.

We have a victim bound with cords (like a sacrifice), led into a priestly courtyard (with a fire/altar at its centre!),

and, later, we find Jesus surrounded by ritual-related imagery...
...such as wood, scarlet fabric, hyssop (dipped in wine/blood), and fresh water (cp. Leviticus 14),

all of which serves to frame Jesus as the culmination of Israel’s sacrifices.
In addition, John’s passion has a legal dimension.

Jesus is declared innocent by Jerusalem’s legal authorities, yet is nevertheless treated as a guilty party,

which reflects (and in part effects) the theological consequences of Jesus’ death.
In death, YHWH’s ‘righteous servant’ is ‘reckoned among the transgressors’ (Isa. 53).

A sinless one becomes ‘sin on his people’s behalf’ (2 Cor. 5).
In what follows, however, I want to consider a different layer of imagery altogether:

creation related imagery.
==== JOHN & CREATION ====

That John’s Gospel contains allusions to creation isn’t hard to see.

John’s Gospel opens in darkness, with God accompanied by ‘the Word’,

against which backdrop the Spirit hovers above the waters (of baptism),...
...and a greater and a lesser light emerge on the earth (Jesus and John).

John’s passion also contains allusions to creation.

A garden, thorns, guards, flames, a source of life drawn forth from a man’s side: so the list goes on.
John’s use of these images is often dealt with summarily, as if John simply wanted to allude to the general notion of (re)creation (because a new age was about to begin), but didn’t have much else to tell us.
John’s use of creationary imagery, however, is careful and precise.

It can be analysed in terms of three main categories.
==== CONTEXT_DEFINERS ====

John’s narrative involves various details/images which define a context in light of which its events are to be interpreted.
Unlike the Synoptics’, John’s passion is set within a garden...

...or, to be more precise, it’s bookended by references to gardens.

It opens in the garden near the river Kidron, and closes in the garden in which Jesus’ tomb is located.
Its events thus (symbolically) unfold within the context of a garden.
Meanwhile, whereas the Synoptics have the skies grow dark at the time of Jesus’ crucifixion, John enshrouds his entire passion narrative in darkness.

Its events are initiated by a man who heads out into the night (to betray his master);
it opens in darkness when Jesus is arrested in the darkness of the Kidron valley (‘Kidron’ means ‘darkness’);

and it concludes at nightfall as Nicodemus—who first approached Jesus at night (cp. 19.39)—carries Jesus’ body away.
These details are significant.

For John, Jesus’ crucifixion is dark and decreational.

As John’s passion week comes to a close, a primordial darkness envelops the land (just as the floodwaters enveloped the pre-flood world).
Mercifully, however, John’s Gospel doesn’t end in darkness.

The darkness of the crucifixion is not a darkness which will overcome the light;

it is a darkness which stands at the cusp of a new dawn, pregnant with hope.
And, in ch. 20, that hope is realised.

In and through Jesus’ resurrection (the Son-rise), the darkness is dispelled.

The land of Israel emerges from the floodwaters.

A new day dawns.
==== SEQUENTIAL IMAGERY ====

John’s narrative also incorporates a sequence of images which depict a reversal of man’s fall.

It begins with (allusions to) the effects of Adam’s sin (Genesis 3),...
... rewinds through the cultivation of Eden (Genesis 2b),

and ends in a barren garden (Genesis 2a)—a direction of travel illustrated in the table below:
As we move through the text of Genesis 2–3, we read about a barren garden,

the creation of Eve (from Adam’s side),

a thorn-cursed creation,

and a fiery sword-bearer (who blocks the way to the tree of life).
As we move through the text of John 18–19, we encounter (allusions to) the same events, but arranged in reverse order.

Symbolically, therefore, Jesus undoes Adam’s fall.
First of all, he approaches the garden’s guards (equipped with torches and weapons), who fall backwards as he announces his identity (‘I am the one!’). (The way to the tree of life will soon be reopened.)
Next, Jesus is brought before Pilate’s judgment seat, where he is crowned with thorns, i.e., where he takes the responsibility for Adam’s sin.
Thereafter, a spear is thrust into Jesus’ side, from which the water of life flows forth. (‘Eve’ means ‘life’.)
And, finally, just as Eden is ‘planted’ in a land in which no-one has previously laboured, so Jesus’ body/seed is planted in a tomb in which no-one has previously lain.

Like Adam, Jesus returns to the ground.
John’s narrative thus takes us back to a pre-fall world—to a time prior to man’s transgression,

to a place (the garden) prior to man’s exile,

and to a state prior to creation’s curse,

which it does by means of distinctly Johannine imagery.
John’s story, however, is far from over.

Just as the darkness of the crucifixion is not a darkness which overcomes the light (but anticipates its arrival), so the barrenness of John 19’s garden is not the barrenness of infertility;
it is a barrenness of an unformed world which anticipates new life.

Buried within it is the body of Jesus—a grain of wheat which has died and fallen into the ground.
Hence, in John 20, on the basis of Jesus’ resurrection, Jesus assigns his disciples a new Adamic commission, which will continue to undo the effects of Adam’s fall.
==== JUXTAPOSITIONS ====

John’s narrative also involves images which portray Jesus’ actions as those of a man who triumphs where Adam fell.

These images extend the notion of curse-reversal, but with their spotlight on Jesus’ obedience.
Let’s spell some of these contrasts out in more detail.

Consider for a start the events of the garden next to the Kidron valley.
Whereas the first Adam incriminates (‘The woman gave it to me!’), the last Adam protects (‘Let these men go!’).

Whereas the first Adam hides in the garden, the last Adam puts himself in the cross hairs.
And, whereas the first Adam is provided with a helper, the last Adam is abandoned.

Like the Levitical high priest, he must do his work alone.
Next, consider the events of Jesus’ trial.

Whereas the first man fails in his task and ‘becomes like the gods’, the God-become-man triumphs.
Whereas the first Adam is crowned with glory and honour, which he later exchanges for thorns, the last Adam is crowned with thorns, to be exchanged for a crown of glory.
And, whereas the first Adam’s reference to a ‘woman’ is an accusation, the last Adam’s ensures his mother’s safety.
(‘Woman, behold your son!’)
Finally, consider Jesus’ death.

Whereas Adam takes his first breath in a garden, Jesus breathes his last in a garden.

Whereas Adam freely eats from a tree, Jesus is compelled to drink from a divinely appointed cup.
And, whereas the first Adam’s disobedience brings death on his descendants, the last Adam’s obedience brings life to his people.

Per Caiaphas’s prophecy, ‘one man dies for the nation’.
==== A FINAL REFLECTION ====

John’s passion narrative involves an array of creation-related images.

These images are not randomly arranged, and cannot (or at least should not) simply be slotted into our favourite schema.
They have been carefully arranged so as to depict the reversal of Adam’s fall, courtesy of Jesus’ obedience.

And, by means of their backdrop of primordial darkness, they situate Jesus’ death at the very dawn of time.
Just as the effects of the fall have rippled outwards until all creation has felt their impact, so too will the effects of Jesus’ death, until the whole earth has been filled with the knowledge of God.

THE END.

jamesbejon.substack.com/p/johns-passio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Bejon

James Bejon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JamesBejon

9 Jun
THREAD: Fun with Genealogies.

Soon after the Israelites’ conquest of the trans-Jordan, the Machirites (descendants of Manasseh) came to Moses in order to raise the issue of Zelophehad’s inheritance.
Zelophehad had only fathered daughters.

Hence, if his daughters married Israelites from a different tribe, the Machirites would lose a sizeable chunk of their land-inheritance.
At first blush, the Machirites’ concern seems reasonable enough.

But it also raises a question.
Read 17 tweets
25 May
THREAD: The Book of Judges & its Anti-Feasts

SUBTITLE: A Liturgy of Violence
The book of Judges is a book of deliverance.

That might make it sound like a fairly upbeat story.

Sadly, however, it’s anything but.

As the book unfolds, its acts of deliverance become progressively more bloody and paradoxical, as do its deliverers,...
...until, in the book’s awful finale, deliverance doesn’t come at all.

A helpless woman is delivered over to her enemies.

These acts of deliverance—or, in the last case, non-deliverance—are portrayed as inversions/antitheses of Israel’s major feasts.
Read 52 tweets
14 May
THREAD: Jesus is King!

#David, #Nebuchadnezzar, #Doves, and the #Messiah.

Matthew opens his Gospel with a statement of Jesus’ right to occupy David’s throne.

Mark and Luke do too, but they do things their own way,

and reveal a lot about kingship in the process.
Kings were always part of God’s plan.

Back in Genesis 17, Abraham was told kings would come forth from his loins.

And they soon did.
From Israel’s perspective, however, kings were a two-edged sword.

They could bring about the best of times and the worst of times.
Read 20 tweets
3 May
THREAD: Belshazzar’s Riddle.

SUB-TITLE: When I consider the work of your hands...

#Babylon, #Numerology, #MedoPersia, #Stargazers: what’s not to like?

Later, a substack link. As a taster, however, let me (try to!) intrigue you with some data.
The text of Daniel 5 is patterned around a whole array of threefold groups and structures.

It consists of three paragraphs and thirty verses.
It contains three notable triplets, namely:

✅ Daniel’s trio of attributes (‘light, insight, and wisdom’),

✅ Daniel’s threefold ability (‘the ability to interpret dreams, explain riddles, and solve problems’), and
Read 28 tweets
18 Apr
THREAD: We three kings of Israel aren’t.

SUB-TITLE: A method to Matthew’s apparent madness.

As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1-17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

P.S. Substack version available at the end.
As is well known, Matthew’s genealogy (in Matt. 1.1–17) consists of three groups of fourteen generations.

Between Abraham and Israel’s first great king (David) we have fourteen generations;

between David and Israel’s great disaster (the exile) we have a further fourteen;
and between the exile and Israel’s great deliverer (the Messiah) we have our final fourteen.

Every fourteen generations, an event of epochal significance takes place, which makes Jesus’ arrival right on cue.

‘It’s almost as if God planned it’, Bart Ehrman says.
Read 36 tweets
6 Apr
<THREAD>

Pharaoh & the NT’s birth narratives:

arguably not the most seasonal of threads, but then we’ve had a bit of snow in the UK today.

And let’s face it, it’s been a strange year all round.
Raymond Brown has written a 750-page monograph on Matthew and Luke’s birth narratives. That’s about 8,500 tweets’ worth.

On pp. 34–37, Brown says the two birth narratives are largely ahistorical.
Matthew would have mentioned Luke’s census if it had taken place, Brown says,

and Luke would have mentioned the massacre of the infants.

Let’s see if we think Brown’s right.
Read 82 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(