@tedcruz @dundreary Someone did not read Christopher Steele's written answers to an interrogative given by the counsel of one of the many litigants against Mr. Steele for libeling them. His answer for why he was hired by the law firm of Pekins Coie to create the Steele Dossier:
@tedcruz @dundreary 4. Is it Orbis’ case that Fusion’s client needed the information contained in
Memorandum 112:
(a) For the purposes of prospective legal proceedings?
(b) For the purposes of obtaining legal advice?
(c) For the purpose of establishing, exercising or defending legal rights.
@tedcruz @dundreary Response: (b) and (c). Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie
LIP. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the
@tedcruz @dundreary legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election. Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC
Inc. (also known as “Hillary for America”) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity
@tedcruz @dundreary of the outcome of that election. In turn, that may have resulted in legal proceedings within the
meaning of limb (a) above, but the immediate needs of Fusion’s clients fell with in limbs (b) and (c).
@tedcruz @dundreary So, Hillary wanted to challenge the outcome of the 2016 election if she would lose it if it could be established that Russia interfered in the election to put Trump in the White House. Not only that, but she gave this advice to Biden about 2020.
@tedcruz @dundreary This means Democrats challenged the results of Presidential elections 50% of the time so far in this century.
@tedcruz @dundreary I forgot this one. Please unroll. I can use it again. Thanks.
@tedcruz @dundreary @threadreaderapp Please unroll. I would like to use this again in the future.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Guy Jordan

Guy Jordan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Farrier105

16 May
@_whitneywebb
The Powers that Be know this research caused problems for them, so now the story about the "Spike Protein" has changed.

drugtargetreview.com/news/90224/gen…
Here are examples of the original story from back in 2020. The spike protein from the Corona virus is the protein the mRNA will present to our cells in its encoding. These are in both print and video versions.
Read 13 tweets
18 Apr
@aaronjmate What would it matter if Manafort gave Kilimnik "campaign data" whatever the hell that is? It isn't a national security secret, it is "campaign stuff." The campaign was Manafort's new assignment since he failed to move the Yanukovych in Ukraine toward EU and NATO, after using...
@aaronjmate ...his influence on behalf of the State Department and CIA to do so (in order to hold off FBI/DOJ investigations of his white collar crimes) which was his previous assignment. So, he talks about his new gig with Kilimnik, the important Ukrainian source for the Obama...
@aaronjmate ...Administration, whom Manafort introduced to the US Embassy personnel in Kiev which launched Kilimnik's work trading "information" with State Department and CIA personnel in the Embassy there. Manafort knows Kilimnik, so he talks shop with him. Manafort has no access...
Read 17 tweets
28 Jan
@philllosoraptor @JackPosobiec Actually, the do not have a good case against him since he did not perform any of the acts that the statute defines as violations. When investigating in the early stages, the agent has to match the elements of the crime to the conditional statements (IF-THEN-ELSE logic).
@philllosoraptor @JackPosobiec When reading the statute, 18 USC 241, we see that ONE of the following acts must be performed:
Injure OR
oppress OR
threaten OR
Intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege
@philllosoraptor @JackPosobiec secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; OR

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway OR
Read 16 tweets
19 Jan
The real story of QAnon starts almost exactly one year before Q's first "drop" on 4 Chan. In late October 2016, Steve Pieczenik, former PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE EXPERT with the CIA and the State Department, put out a You Tube video in which he claimed...
...of having launched a "countercoup" against Hillary and Bill Clinton with the help of a secret group in intelligence and the military to prevent the Clintons from stealing the 2016 election. Pieczenik described how his group was allied with JULIAN ASSANGE to use the DNC...
..and Podesta emails to foil this plot by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

This story is a variant of two opposing stories in the saga of the 2016 election that dominated news and politics for the past 4 years--The QAnon story and the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks story...
Read 25 tweets
25 Dec 20
@franifio How did Putin get Trump nominated? Trump had to get nominated for Putin to get him elected. Your answer must include evidence, including documents, testimony, and other forms of evidence as defined in the Federal Code of Criminal Procedure, The Rules of Evidence.
@franifio I have the answer to how Trump got nominated, and the evidence, which is considerable. Putin had nothing to do with it.
@franifio Here we go---First, Hillary asked her friends in the media to "elevate" Trump as she wanted to run against him.

medium.com/@bjcampbell/th…

observer.com/2016/10/wikile…
Read 13 tweets
8 Nov 20
@RichHiggins_DC Total Votes by Position, GOP and Democrat

Congress: GOP Democrat Totals
257,487 182,632 440,119

President 257,005 275,293 532,298

Difference 482 -92,661 -92,179

Drill down:
@RichHiggins_DC The problem is there are votes just for President totaling 92,179 as opposed to the candidates for Member of Congress (MC). If the Democrat candidate for MC and the GOP for MC had split the difference, there wouldn't be an issue.
@RichHiggins_DC This reflects electronic votes or paper ballots with votes only for President, and not for MC. Those votes went to Biden. That is clear by the numbers. This needs explained. See, if votes went to the MC candidates in that quantity, that would cover it. These votes only...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(