Every single proposal for an “invisible” NI border has the same problem. Every single time smn tries to rethink border formalities and eliminate the dreaded customs “checks” they fall into the same 3⃣ pitfalls.
Typical mistake – thinking that removing checks “solves” the border. It doesn’t. Checks are rarely the problem. They are a small part of work and costs for traders.
/2
2⃣ Not removing checks just shifting them to a different time / place
The need for checks and verification stays. Especially when proposals suggest making non-compliance a criminal offence – that requires enforcement, which requires checks.
/3
3⃣ Placing an additional burden on traders
Because of the 👆 two all of these proposals mean additional burden (work, time, cost) for traders.
You’re not “solving” the border by making it much more difficult and time-consuming for companies to trade across it.
/4
It's not the proposed tech solutions that are the issue.
It's not the drones or blockchain that make these proposals unworkable.
It's these 3⃣👆
It's the fact that they don't actually solve anything.
5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did you not have any conversations about how it would look in practice? What facilitating trade means and what cheks can be simplified?
Why not?
/2
The requirement to treat the movement of goods into Northern Ireland as if they were crossing the EU external border is implied in the Protocol and results from applying customs legislation to NI and placing the border in the Irish Sea.
/3
The only thing I would add is that I think that “defending the integrity of SM” at the end of the day wasn’t about the details- checks and formalities. It's a concept.
The EU was/is after the one thing that the UK does not want to provide – reassurance and certainty.
🚛 Here is an interesting fact - it’s end of June and we don’t yet have a functioning border management system.
Remember the Goods Vehicle Movement Service (GVMS)? The system that was supposed to be first implemented in January to manage our borders?
/1
Remember how we all talked about the fact that you don’t build IT systems in a few months? That they require testing etc? And how Gov was sure it will be ready?
It wasn’t ready so the full implementation was pushed back to June.
/2
A while back, together with all the announcements around further easements and extensions, GVMS was pushed back to Jan 2022.
/3
An article on the top 5 benefits of joining the CPTPP written by the UK's Chief Negotiator for accession to CPTPP - so basically the right person to ask.
Read it carefully cause the wording is very important here.
/1
These deals will take away from the impact of the CPTPP.
Joe also mentioned the caveat in the report.
Measuring the impact of FTAs before they are implemented or negotiated is tricky and can only provide a rough estimate.
/2