Today, #SCOTUS will share decisions for two cases that directly impact the freedom to vote and ensuring transparency in campaign finance: Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, and Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta.

Here's what's at issue:
Let's start with Brnovich v. DNC.

The outcome of this case will determine if Section 2 of the #VotingRightsAct, which provides protection against racial discrimination in voting, is still a viable tool for protecting the freedom to vote.
As @PaulSmithCLC & @JaydenHohnson wrote in a recent analysis: "The Brnovich case is an opportunity for the Court to make clear that the VRA leaves no room for racial disadvantage in our elections, and that the importance of democratic equality rises above the political fray."
For a deeper dive into the implications of the Brnovich v. DNC #SCOTUS case, check out @cgfromdc's update here: campaignlegal.org/update/supreme…
Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta is a case about the constitutionality of CA’s confidential tax reporting law. We urge #SCOTUS to uphold its own well-established precedents endorsing voters’ right to know who is spending money to influence our elections & government.
We need more transparency around who is funding political campaigns in our democracy, not less.

That's why CLC urged #SCOTUS to reject Americans for Prosperity Foundation's challenge to the California disclosure law in a recent update.

campaignlegal.org/update/clc-and…
Decisions from #SCOTUS are expected soon. We'll bring you updates and reactions throughout the day.
Decisions are in:

Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Campaign Legal Center

Campaign Legal Center Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CampaignLegal

5 Jan
American democracy has suffered attacks over the past decade.

It’s time for change.

The #ForThePeopleAct (#HR1) would enact some of the greatest improvements our democracy has seen in decades. What's in the bill? Here are some of the highlights: 1/
campaignlegal.org/update/how-hr-…
#HR1 will protect access to the fundamental right to vote. It would ensure voters can always register on Election Day and are not wrongfully purged from voter rolls. The bill would also expand the right to vote by mail to every eligible voter. 2/
campaignlegal.org/update/safe-an…
#HR1 will end partisan gerrymandering & ensure #FairMaps for all. H.R.1 requires the establishment of an independent redistricting commission (IRC) in each state, a reform essential to restoring confidence that every vote matters. Learn more about IRCs: 3/
campaignlegal.org/democracyu/acc…
Read 9 tweets
28 Jul 20
#BREAKING: We just filed an @FEC complaint alleging the Trump campaign secretly hid the ultimate recipients of nearly $170 million in spending. Unlawful secrecy is unacceptable for any presidential campaign; our transparency laws must be enforced. campaignlegal.org/update/clc-fil…
The Trump campaign reported millions in payments to firms headed by Trump’s former campaign manager, Brad Parscale, and other firms, who disbursed funds to the campaign’s ultimate vendors. This had the effect of hiding millions in payments.
We’ve asked the @FEC—the only federal agency dedicated to enforcing the laws governing presidential campaigns—to take action. However, the @FEC lacks a quorum and cannot take action. We need a strong, reformed @FEC to protect the integrity of our elections. #FixTheFEC
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar 18
.@maddow just reported on our complaint, being filed tomorrow w/ the @FEC, calling for an investigation into the convoluted relationship between Mercer-backed John Bolton super PAC and Cambridge Analytica (also primarily owned by Mercer).
Our complaint says the John Bolton super PAC violated election laws. Thom Tillis/NC GOP & John Bolton Super PAC used Cambridge Analytica’s services. It seems @CamAnalytica used information from its work for Thom Tillis/NC GOP to develop the John Bolton Super PAC pro-Tillis ads.
Super PACS can accept unlimited contributions if they are independent but if super PACs can coordinate spending with campaigns, they can get around laws that limit the amount of money candidates can take. That’s what the John Bolton Super PAC did here.
Read 6 tweets
9 Nov 17
CLC's @waltshaub met with Chair @TGowdySC and Ranking Member @RepCummings of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee today, laying out 13 actions that would strengthen government ethics in the U.S. bit.ly/2hoetZz
Action #1-- It's critical to insulate the Director of @OfficeGovEthics from potential political retaliation
Action #2-- OGE needs to be able to communicate directly with Congress so that it can raise concerns about the activities of the Executive Branch, offer solutions, and discuss its budget without needing permission from another agency.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(