For reference, that particular image I made in 2012, not 2016 - blog.gardeviance.org/2012/07/magic-… ... however, that's splitting hairs on years, the point is still the same. Well done MSFT, a good win for Azure.
I called Open Stack a dead duck in 2012 because the people running it didn't know what they were doing. Sure, it made money but Telcos gambling huge amounts of shareholder money on a "no hope" cause because of executive decree and ego is normal, not a guide to the future.
The only people who seemed to play the game well with OpenStack was VMware ... they used it to buy years, if not a decade of time for their company.
Smart play.
I really thought VMware had painted itself into a corner with VCE ... another fool's errand ... but the way they managed to turn OpenStack to their advantage is one for the text books.
You could also argue that Oracle was playing the same game but it always seemed to be doubling down on exadata ... another fool's errand, like VCE and sure ... whilst it's not the future, there is money to be made from these things - you'd be amazed at what execs will spend on.
Still, well done AT&T for finally catching up with the rest of the world. A decade late but better late than never - sdxcentral.com/articles/news/…
Before you ask, AT&T wasn't the company involved in this discussion -
... but that was long ago, the money wasted and no surprises.
If I could summarise, it would be in the depressing familiarity of this graphic ... it has been a repeating theme of the last decade+ ... along with the assumption that just buying some tech will give you the behaviours you need i.e. owning a data lake versus being data driven.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Loved this. One slide which says it all. Before anyone goes "serverless is the future" ... no, "serverless is the norm" - it's just that so many are yet to realise this. Give it time, another five years or so ->
At which point, between 2024 to 2029, we will be reaching the "Oh f&*k" stage of enterprise adoption of serverless and you won't be able to hire serverless developers because every other company will be scrambling to do the same.
X : What's the future then?
Me : The future is always about practices, the technology is the underlying cause. The practices you should be concerned about today are highlighted in green (the grey is what you should have been concerned about in 2011).
When you look at next generation behaviour then being influenced by something other than the executive circle is an encouraging sign, however the structure of the next generation is firmly towards remote work ...
i.e. the office is the last bastion of a centralised mentality and our communication mechanisms have changed to the point that such a mentality is no longer fit for the modern age ... still ...
Finally ... finished my research report (well, at least the first draft for peer review) ... gosh, this has been a hard slog. Now playing catch up with everything I've missed.
X : What's the report on?
Me : The new behaviours that represent the future of organisations.
X : I though it was about technology?
Me : An enabler that is mostly secondary to the discussion.
X : Technology matters.
Me : Hmmm ....
... think about what makes a great football player. Behaviours or Technology i.e. can you buy a pair of football boots that will turn you into Ronaldo? That's part of the problem with IT, people keep thinking it's about technology ...
X : What interesting emerging technology have you seen? Cloud?AI?
Me : None of that is emerging and the question is irrelevant. What you should be interested in is the emerging behaviours / practice. The technology just supports this.
X : Like DevOps.
Me : Not emerging. A given.
X : What is emerging then?
Me : This. A next generation of behaviours.
X : Hmmm, I don't agree.
Me : Hmmm, I don't care. I have a population study to counter your or my opinion.
X : Well, how do I do leaderless leadership?
Me : The whole field of distributed leadership is emerging. There is no guide yet, there are just companies experimenting in this space. You asked for emerging.
X : I should experiment?
Me : Depends.
As someone who started on a council estate, living with grandparents, single mum working in another part of the country ... this ... 100% this ... youth services, grants, libraries, investment in schools etc made all the difference ->
Oh, and I ended up going to Cambridge but that was long ago. If I had been born in today's climate with the same start ... I doubt that would have happened. Nothing to do with people saying "white privilege", everything to do with destruction of the state and supporting systems.
Of course, if I hadn't gone to University, I'd never have come up with mapping which itself has saved this Gov £millions. I'd love to see a study on just how much austerity has actually cost us ... we'll never know of course but I suspect the answer is vastly more than it saved.
X : You argue for sortition?
Me : A democratic system (with debates, majority voting, two representative houses) but representatives chosen by lottery not by election i.e. 4 people from each region, giving 2.600 MPs serving for 4 years with 1/4 replaced each year ...
... the problem we have is that elections do not create a representative parliament, there are lots of barriers to becoming an MP etc. We have 90k people in my district and our MP is Damian Collins ... as far as I can tell, random selection would on average find someone better.
So, 4 people selected at random from each district, each serving for four years with 1/4 replaced each year ... I can't see how you wouldn't end up with a better quality of candidates in the houses of parliament and a more effective government.